Literature DB >> 30609904

Sociodemographic factors and strategies in colorectal cancer screening: a narrative review and practical recommendations.

Lara Moons1, An Mariman1,2,3, Peter Vermeir1,2,3, Luc Colemont4, Els Clays1,5, Hans Van Vlierberghe1,3,6, Dirk Vogelaers1,2,3.   

Abstract

Background: Worldwide colorectal cancer is a frequently occurring cancer with a high disease burden. It is the second most frequent cancer in women and the third in men. The incidence of colorectal cancer is increasing because of ageing and unhealthy lifestyles.Aim: We aimed to perform a narrative literature review on methods and strategies for screening for colorectal cancer prior to colonoscopy.Design: Narrative literature review.
Methods: The databases PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and The Cochrane Library were searched using keywords: 'colorectal cancer', '(mass) screening', 'occult blood', 'prevention', 'socioeconomic status', 'early diagnosis', 'Europe' and 'ethnicity'/'ethnic groups'.
Results: 18 articles were included. Multiple randomised controlled trials have shown that screening programmes with faecal occult blood tests (FOBT), guaiac-FOBT (gFOBT) and immunochemical FOBT (iFOBT) represent a valid prevention strategy. Most studies favour iFOBT, because of ease to use, resulting in a higher uptake of screening, as well as a higher detection rate. A higher uptake is also achieved by mailing of the test. Overall the uptake of screening is higher in women, although more cancers are diagnosed in men. This can be explained by a lower sensitivity of FOBT in women. Furthermore, a strong correlation was found between a low socio-economic status and a low uptake of screening. The screening age lies between 50-74 years.
Conclusion: Colorectal cancer is characterized by a significant incidence, morbidity and mortality. Systematic screening is effective for early detection. A non-selective test with iFOBT currently has the best validity with a higher sensitivity in men.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; ethnicity; mass screening; prevention; socioeconomic status

Year:  2019        PMID: 30609904     DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2018.1563736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Clin Belg        ISSN: 1784-3286            Impact factor:   1.264


  3 in total

1.  Attributes Used for Cancer Screening Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rebekah Hall; Antonieta Medina-Lara; Willie Hamilton; Anne E Spencer
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  TMT-Based Quantitative Proteomics Analysis Reveals the Panoramic Pharmacological Molecular Mechanism of β-Elemonic Acid Inhibition of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yong Xia; Jinfan Yang; Chao Li; Xiaopeng Hao; Huixia Fan; Yuyang Zhao; Jinfu Tang; Xiufu Wan; Sen Lian; Jian Yang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 5.810

3.  Expression Levels and Clinical Significance of Serum miR-497, CEA, CA24-2, and HBsAg in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Jie Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.246

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.