Literature DB >> 30609214

Composite cardiovascular risk factor target achievement and its predictors in US adults with diabetes: The Diabetes Collaborative Registry.

Wenjun Fan1, Yang Song2, Silvio E Inzucchi3, Laurence Sperling4, Christopher P Cannon2,5, Suzanne V Arnold6, Mikhail Kosiborod6, Nathan D Wong1.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate multiple risk factor target attainment in adults with diabetes mellitus (DM) for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) prevention and the predictors of such attainment in a contemporary DM registry.
METHODS: In the US Diabetes Collaborative Registry we identified patients who were at target for glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c; < 53 mmol/mol (7%) or < 64 mmol/mol (8%) if with ASCVD), LDL cholesterol (< 2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) or < 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) 1.8 if with ASCVD) and blood pressure (BP; <140/90 mmHg and < 130/80 mmHg as an alternate), and who had non-smoking status, by sex, race and history of ASCVD. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine predictors of target attainment.
RESULTS: In 74 393 patients with DM who had available data (mean age 69.0 years, 41.0% women), overall target attainment for HbA1c, BP, LDL cholesterol and non-smoking status was 73.6%, 69.0% (40.3% for BP <130/80 mmHg), 48.6% and 85.2%, respectively. Only 21.6% (13.0% with BP <130/80 mmHg) were at target for all four measures, and the proportions were higher in men (23.6%) versus women (18.6%) and in white people (22.5%) versus African-American people (14.7%) and people of other races (20.8%; P < 0.01). A total of 62.4% were on a moderate-/high-intensity statin. Age (≥65 years: odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-2.0; and 55-64 years: OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.4 vs. <55 years), male sex (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.3-1.4), white race (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.3-1.5), middle or high income (ORs 1.1, 95% CI 1.1-1.2 or 1.4, 95% CI 1.4-1.5, respectively) were associated, and depression (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.8-1.0) was inversely associated with meeting all four targets (all P = 0.01 to P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In our US registry of patients with DM, only one in five patients were achieving comprehensive risk factor control. Multifactorial interventions will be necessary to optimize ASCVD risk factor control.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular disease; prevention; risk factors; type 2 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30609214     DOI: 10.1111/dom.13625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab        ISSN: 1462-8902            Impact factor:   6.577


  14 in total

1.  Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease in Women: Current Challenges and New Hope.

Authors:  Efstratios Koutroumpakis; David Aguilar
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2020-04-01

2.  CRS Diabetes: An Effective Model for Improving Family Medicine Resident Knowledge, Competence, and Performance in Diabetes Care.

Authors:  Nora A Williams; Stephen A Brunton; Gregory A Scott
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2022-01

Review 3.  Integrated Care Model of Adiposity-Related Chronic Diseases.

Authors:  Thierry H Le Jemtel; Rohan Samson; Suzanne Oparil
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Metabolic control achievement in a population with premature coronary artery disease: results of the genetics of atherosclerotic disease study.

Authors:  Aida X Medina-Urrutia; Froylan D Martínez-Sánchez; Carlos Posadas-Romero; Esteban Jorge-Galarza; María Del Rocío Martínez-Alvarado; María Del Carmen González-Salazar; Horacio Osorio-Alonso; Juan Gabriel Juárez-Rojas
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.565

5.  Rationale, Design, and Implementation of Intensive Risk Factor Treatment in the CREST2 Trial.

Authors:  Tanya N Turan; Jenifer H Voeks; Marc I Chimowitz; Ana Roldan; Todd LeMatty; William Haley; Maria Lopes-Virella; Seemant Chaturvedi; Michael Jones; Donald Heck; George Howard; Brajesh K Lal; James F Meschia; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  2020 Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Novel Therapies for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee.

Authors:  Sandeep R Das; Brendan M Everett; Kim K Birtcher; Jenifer M Brown; James L Januzzi; Rita R Kalyani; Mikhail Kosiborod; Melissa Magwire; Pamela B Morris; Joshua J Neumiller; Laurence S Sperling
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  The challenge of multiple cardiovascular risk factor control outside Western Europe: Findings from the International ChoLesterol management Practice Study.

Authors:  Dirk J Blom; Raul D Santos; Veronique Daclin; Florence Mercier; Alvaro J Ruiz; Nicolas Danchin
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 7.804

8.  Improving Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  David Aguilar
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 9.  Comprehensive Care Models for Cardiometabolic Disease.

Authors:  Cara Reiter-Brennan; Omar Dzaye; Dorothy Davis; Mike Blaha; Robert H Eckel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Cardiovascular Benefit of Empagliflozin Across the Spectrum of Cardiovascular Risk Factor Control in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial.

Authors:  Silvio E Inzucchi; Kamlesh Khunti; David H Fitchett; Christoph Wanner; Michaela Mattheus; Jyothis T George; Anne Pernille Ofstad; Bernard Zinman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.