Literature DB >> 30608590

Methods for updating a risk prediction model for cardiac surgery: a statistical primer.

Sabrina Siregar1, Daan Nieboer2, Michel I M Versteegh1,3, Ewout W Steyerberg2,4, Johanna J M Takkenberg5.   

Abstract

Risk prediction models in cardiac surgery tend to lose their predictive performance over time. This statistical primer aims to provide an overview of updating methods with their strengths and weaknesses. This is important, as model updating may be an efficient and good alternative to the de novo development of risk models. The discussed methods are intercept recalibration, logistic recalibration, model revision, closed test procedure and Bayesian modelling. It is recommended to report an updated model according to the transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) statement and to include calibration and discrimination plots of the original and updated models to assess the model performance. An example is provided for updating the EuroSCORE II model in a national cohort from the Netherlands. Logistic recalibration results in a significant improvement of model performance, without the risk of overfitting. The example illustrates that more data allow for more extensive updating methods.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Cardiac surgery; Outcomes; Prediction models; Risk factors; Statistics

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30608590     DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivy338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  6 in total

1.  Systematic Review of Approaches to Preserve Machine Learning Performance in the Presence of Temporal Dataset Shift in Clinical Medicine.

Authors:  Lin Lawrence Guo; Stephen R Pfohl; Jason Fries; Jose Posada; Scott Lanyon Fleming; Catherine Aftandilian; Nigam Shah; Lillian Sung
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.762

2.  Update and, internal and temporal-validation of the FRANCE-2 and ACC-TAVI early-mortality prediction models for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) using data from the Netherlands heart registration (NHR).

Authors:  Hatem Al-Farra; Bas A J M de Mol; Anita C J Ravelli; W J P P Ter Burg; Saskia Houterman; José P S Henriques; Ameen Abu-Hanna; M M Vis; J Vos; L Timmers; W A L Tonino; C E Schotborgh; V Roolvink; F Porta; M G Stoel; S Kats; G Amoroso; H W van der Werf; P R Stella; P de Jaegere
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-01-23

3.  External validation of an opioid misuse machine learning classifier in hospitalized adult patients.

Authors:  Majid Afshar; Brihat Sharma; Sameer Bhalla; Hale M Thompson; Dmitriy Dligach; Randy A Boley; Ekta Kishen; Alan Simmons; Kathryn Perticone; Niranjan S Karnik
Journal:  Addict Sci Clin Pract       Date:  2021-03-17

4.  Evaluation of domain generalization and adaptation on improving model robustness to temporal dataset shift in clinical medicine.

Authors:  Lin Lawrence Guo; Stephen R Pfohl; Jason Fries; Alistair E W Johnson; Jose Posada; Catherine Aftandilian; Nigam Shah; Lillian Sung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Why did European Radiology reject my radiomic biomarker paper? How to correctly evaluate imaging biomarkers in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Steve Halligan; Yves Menu; Sue Mallett
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Remote monitoring data from cardiac implantable electronic devices predicts all-cause mortality.

Authors:  Fozia Zahir Ahmed; Camilla Sammut-Powell; Chun Shing Kwok; Tricia Tay; Manish Motwani; Glen P Martin; Joanne K Taylor
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 5.214

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.