Literature DB >> 30608521

Ambulatory heart rate reduction after catheter-based renal denervation in hypertensive patients not receiving anti-hypertensive medications: data from SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED, a randomized, sham-controlled, proof-of-concept trial.

Michael Böhm1, Felix Mahfoud1, Raymond R Townsend2, David E Kandzari3, Stuart Pocock4, Christian Ukena1, Michael A Weber5, Satoshi Hoshide6, Manesh Patel7, Crystal C Tyson8, Joachim Weil9, Tolga Agdirlioglu9, Martin Fahy10, Kazuomo Kario6.   

Abstract

AIMS: The randomized sham-controlled SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED trial demonstrated that renal denervation (RDN) using a multi-electrode catheter lowers ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in non-medicated hypertensive patients. The current report describes the effects of RDN on heart rate (HR) in this population. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients were enrolled with an office systolic BP (SBP) of ≥150 mmHg and <180 mmHg, office diastolic BP (DBP) of ≥90 mmHg, and a mean ambulatory SBP of ≥140 mmHg and <170 mmHg. Patients were drug naïve or removed from their anti-hypertensive medications. Eighty patients were randomized 1:1 to RDN or sham procedure. This post hoc analysis examines the effect at 3 months of RDN on HR and of high baseline 24-h HR on BP and HR changes. There was a significant reduction in 24-h HR at 3 months for the RDN group (-2.5 b.p.m.) compared with sham (-0.2 b.p.m.), P = 0.003 (analysis of covariance). Mean baseline-adjusted treatment differences were significantly different between groups at 3 months for average morning HR (-4.4 b.p.m., P = 0.046) and minimum morning HR (-3.0 b.p.m., P = 0.026). RDN patients with baseline 24-h HR above the median (73.5 b.p.m.) had significant reductions in average ambulatory SBP (-10.7 mmHg difference, P = 0.001) and DBP (-7.5 mmHg, P < 0.001), whereas BP changes in RDN patients with below-median HRs were not significant.
CONCLUSION: Average and minimum morning HR were significantly reduced at 3 months for RDN compared with sham patients. A baseline 24-h HR above the median predicted greater BP reductions and may allow physicians to select patients likely to respond to the procedure. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heart rate; Hypertension; Renal denervation

Year:  2019        PMID: 30608521     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  26 in total

1.  Effects of renal denervation on 24-h heart rate and heart rate variability in resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Christian Ukena; Tobias Seidel; Konstantinos Rizas; Davide Scarsi; Dominic Millenaar; Sebastian Ewen; Axel Bauer; Felix Mahfoud; Michael Böhm
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Renal sympathetic nerve activity regulates cardiovascular energy expenditure in rats fed high salt.

Authors:  Norihiko Morisawa; Kento Kitada; Yoshihide Fujisawa; Daisuke Nakano; Daisuke Yamazaki; Shuhei Kobuchi; Lei Li; Yifan Zhang; Takashi Morikawa; Yoshio Konishi; Takashi Yokoo; Friedrich C Luft; Jens Titze; Akira Nishiyama
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 3.  Renal Denervation: Is It Ready for Prime Time?

Authors:  Lucas Lauder; Milan A Wolf; Sean S Scholz; Mathias Hohl; Felix Mahfoud; Michael Böhm
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Renal denervation in resistant hypertension: a review of clinical trials and future perspectives.

Authors:  Eiichiro Yamamoto; Daisuke Sueta; Kenichi Tsujita
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 5.  [Renal denervation : Really an alternative to reducing blood pressure?]

Authors:  Kristina Striepe; Mario Schiffer; Roland Schmieder
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 6.  Renal denervation: basic and clinical evidence.

Authors:  Kenichi Katsurada; Keisuke Shinohara; Jiro Aoki; Shinsuke Nanto; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 7.  Device-based therapies for arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Lucas Lauder; Michel Azizi; Ajay J Kirtane; Michael Böhm; Felix Mahfoud
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 8.  Italian Society of Arterial Hypertension (SIIA) Position Paper on the Role of Renal Denervation in the Management of the Difficult-to-Treat Hypertensive Patient.

Authors:  Rosa Maria Bruno; Stefano Taddei; Claudio Borghi; Furio Colivicchi; Giovambattista Desideri; Guido Grassi; Alberto Mazza; Maria Lorenza Muiesan; Gianfranco Parati; Roberto Pontremoli; Bruno Trimarco; Massimo Volpe; Claudio Ferri
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2020-03-10

Review 9.  Looking back and thinking forwards - 15 years of cardiology and cardiovascular research.

Authors:  Jonathan M Kalman; Sergio Lavandero; Felix Mahfoud; Matthias Nahrendorf; Magdi H Yacoub; Dong Zhao
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Clinical benefits and safety of renal denervation in severe arterial hypertension: A long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Tino Naduvathumuriyil; Ulrike Held; Klaus Steigmiller; Andrea Denegri; Silviya Cantatore; Slayman Obeid; Andreas J Flammer; Frank Ruschitzka; Thomas F Lüscher; Isabella Sudano
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.