| Literature DB >> 30608053 |
Ayat A Haggag1, Amal Rabiee1, Khaled M Abd Elaziz2, Carl H Campbell3, Daniel G Colley3,4, Reda M R Ramzy5.
Abstract
Forty-five Schistosoma mansoni egg-negative/circulating cathodic antigen (CCA) low (Trace-1+) positive children in areas of very low prevalence were followed up daily for 30 days. Stool and urine specimens were collected and examined each day from each child. At the midpoint of the study, three egg-positive control persons with light intensity infection were included in the protocol. Stool samples were examined by the Kato-Katz (four slides/stool sample) technique and all S. mansoni egg-negative stools were further tested by the "miracidia hatching test" (MHT). Urine samples were examined by the point-of-care CCA assay (POC-CCA). Over 30 days, only one of 1,338 consecutive stool samples from study subjects was S. mansoni egg and MHT positive (0.07%). Egg counts fluctuated daily in stools from positive controls and S. mansoni miracidia were detected in all but two samples by the MHT. Point-of-care-circulating cathodic antigen bands were scored from G1 to G10 and then translated to standard Trace, 1+, 2+, 3+ banding patterns. In two districts, the POC-CCA assays were Trace or 1+ for both the study children and the positive controls. In the third district, the POC-CCA assays were Trace or 1+ for the study children and 1+ or 2+ for the positive control. We conclude that in areas with extremely low prevalence S. mansoni egg-negative and CCA-Trace or 1+ children are unlikely to pose substantial risks to continued transmission of schistosomiasis. In this setting, POC-CCA Trace or 1+ readings are likely to be false positives or perhaps represent low-level single-sex schistosome infections.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30608053 PMCID: PMC6402931 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0829
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg ISSN: 0002-9637 Impact factor: 2.345
Figure 1.Flow diagram of the subject selection process and study protocol based on stool and urine assays.
Relationship between the G grading scale and the standard scale of semi-quantifying the band density of the POC-CCA assay
| G grading scale | Standard scale equivalent |
|---|---|
| G1 | Negative |
| G2 | Trace |
| G3 | Trace |
| G4 | 1+ |
| G5 | 1+ |
| G6 | 2+ |
| G7 | 2+ |
| G8 | 3+ |
| G9 | 3+ |
| G10 | 3+ |
POC-CCA = point-of-care–circulating cathodic antigen.
Comparison between the POC-CCA scores of egg-negative children in the three districts from which the study cohorts were selected
| District name | Number examined | POC-CCA (Negative) No. (%) | POC-CCA (Trace) No. (%) | POC-CCA (1+) No. (%) | POC-CCA (2+) No. (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desouk | 160 | 134 (83.8) | 25 (15.6) | 1 (0.6) | 0 |
| Al Riad | 149 | 122 (81.9) | 25 (16.8) | 2 (1.3) | 0 |
| Sidy Salem* | 156 | 106 (67.9) | 39 (25.0) | 8 (5.2) | 3 (1.9) |
| Total | 465 | 364 (78.3%) | 87 (18.7) | 11 (2.4) | 3 (0.6) |
POC-CCA = point-of-care–circulating cathodic antigen.
* POC-CCA–positives scores in Sidi Salem district were significantly higher than those in the other two districts (X2 = 13.3; P < 0.001).
POC-CCA scores of 15 study schoolchildren and one adult positive control followed up in Desouk district
| Serial No. | ID code | Age (years) | Gender | POC-CCA score* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| When selected | When followed up | |||||
| Negative (No. [%]) | Trace (No. [%]) | |||||
| 1 | 54 | 11 | M | Trace | 5 (16.7) | 25 (83.3) |
| 2 | 56 | 11 | F | Trace | 8 (26.7) | 22 (73.3) |
| 3 | 61 | 11 | F | Trace | 3 (10.0) | 27 (90.0) |
| 4 | 74 | 11 | F | Trace | 7 (23.3) | 23 (76.7) |
| 5 | 82 | 11 | F | Trace | 17 (56.7) | 13 (43.3) |
| 6 | 96 | 10 | M | Trace | 4 (13.3) | 26 (86.7) |
| 7 | 106 | 10 | F | Trace | 1 (3.3) | 29 (96.7) |
| 8 | 111 | 10 | F | Trace | 11 (36.7) | 19 (63.3) |
| 9 | 116 | 9 | M | Trace | 5 (16.7) | 25 (83.3) |
| 10 | 119 | 9 | F | Trace | 8 (26.7) | 22 (73.3) |
| 11 | 121 | 9 | F | Trace | 8 (26.7) | 22 (73.3) |
| 12 | 124 | 9 | F | Trace | 5 (16.7) | 25 (83.3) |
| 13 | 127 | 9 | M | Trace | 7 (23.3) | 23 (76.7) |
| 14 | 136 | 8 | M | Trace | 6 (20.0) | 24 (80.0) |
| 15 | 146 | 8 | M | Trace | 9 (30.0) | 21 (70.0) |
| 16 | 15 | 35† | M | – | – | 13 (100) |
POC-CCA = point-of-care–circulating cathodic antigen.
* All 15 study schoolchildren were followed up for 30 days. They were Schistosoma mansoni egg negative by four Kato–Katz slides/stool sample per day, and miracidial hatching test negative throughout the 30 days. They were all CCA Trace when selected and fluctuated between Negative and Trace during the 30 days, as indicated by the number and percentage of times Negative or Trace.
† Because of time constraint, a Kato–Katz S. mansoni egg–positive control subject of 35 years old was accepted (see details in Table 6).
POC-CCA scores of 15 study schoolchildren and one positive control child followed up in Al Riad district
| Serial No. | ID code | Age (years) | Gender | POC-CCA score* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| When selected | When followed up | |||||
| Trace (No. [%]) | 1+ (No. [%]) | |||||
| 1 | 11 | 13 | M | 1+ | 27 (93.1) | 2 (6.9) |
| 2 | 24 | 13 | F | Trace | 23 (76.7) | 7 (23.3) |
| 3 | 31 | 13 | F | Trace | 25 (96.1) | 1 (3.9) |
| 4 | 38 | 13 | F | Trace | 14 (46.7) | 16 (53.3) |
| 5 | 49 | 13 | F | Trace | 25 (100) | – |
| 6 | 73 | 14 | M | Trace | 27 (96.4) | 1 (3.6) |
| 7 | 99 | 12 | F | Trace | 30 (100) | – |
| 8 | 103 | 12 | F | Trace | 30 (100) | – |
| 9 | 120 | 12 | F | Trace | 29 (96.7) | 1 (3.3) |
| 10 | 124 | 12 | F | Trace | 30 (100) | – |
| 11 | 129 | 12 | F | Trace | 30 (100) | – |
| 12 | 131 | 12 | F | 1+ | 30 (100) | – |
| 13 | 132 | 12 | F | Trace | 29 (96.7) | 1 (3.3) |
| 14 | 133 | 12 | F | Trace | 29 (96.7) | 1 (3.3) |
| 15 | 137 | 12 | F | Trace | 30 (100) | – |
| 16 | 16† | 11 | M | – | 13 (76.5) | 4 (23.5) |
POC-CCA = point-of-care–circulating cathodic antigen.
* All schoolchildren were followed up for 30 days, except ID = 11, for 29 days; ID = 31, for 26 days; ID49, for 25 days; and ID73, for 28 days. All 15 study children were CCA Trace when selected and fluctuated between Negative and Trace during the 30 days, as indicated by the number and percentage of times Negative or Trace. All were Schistosoma mansoni egg negative by four Kato–Katz slides/stool sample per day, and miracidial hatching test negative throughout the 30 days, except for ID = 120. On 1 day, on one Kato-Katz slide, one S. mansoni egg was found in the stool of ID = 120 and two miracidia were seen from that stool specimen.
† Egg-positive control subject.
POC-CCA scores of 15 study schoolchildren and one positive control child followed up in Sidi Salem district
| Serial No. | ID code | Age (years) | Gender | POC-CCA* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| When selected | When followed up | ||||||
| Negative (No. [%]) | Trace (No. [%]) | 1+ (No. [%]) | |||||
| 1 | 3 | 13 | M | Trace | 9 (30.0) | 21 (70.0) | – |
| 2 | 18 | 11 | M | 1+ | 11 (36.7) | 19 (63.3) | – |
| 3 | 19 | 11 | M | 1+ | 2 (6.7) | 28 (93.3) | – |
| 4 | 20 | 11 | M | 1+ | – | 24 (80.0) | 6 (20.0) |
| 5 | 40 | 11 | F | 1+ | 3 (10.0) | 21 (70.0) | 6 (20.0) |
| 6 | 46 | 12 | F | Trace | 3 (10.0) | 24 (80.0) | 3 (10.0) |
| 7 | 47 | 12 | F | Trace | – | 30 (100) | – |
| 8 | 55 | 11 | F | 1+ | – | 26 (86.7) | 4 (13.3) |
| 9 | 56 | 11 | M | 1+ | 3 (10.0) | 26 (86.7) | 1 (3.3) |
| 10 | 63 | 12 | M | Trace | 2 (6.6) | 28 (93.3) | – |
| 11 | 84 | 12 | F | Trace | 2 (6.7) | 24 (80.0) | 4 (13.3) |
| 12 | 109 | 10 | M | 1+ | 1 (3.3) | 27 (76.7) | 2 (6.7) |
| 13 | 118 | 10 | M | Trace | 3 (10.0) | 27 (56.7) | – |
| 14 | 135 | 10 | M | Trace | 1 (3.3) | 29 (96.7) | – |
| 15 | 146 | 9 | F | 1+ | 3 (10.0) | 26 (86.7) | 1 (3.3) |
| 16 | 17† | 10 | M | – | – | – | 1 (5.9) |
POC-CCA = point-of-care–circulating cathodic antigen.
* All schoolchildren were followed for 30 days. All 15 study children were CCA Trace or 1+ when selected and fluctuated between Negative, Trace, and 1+ during the 30 days, as indicated by the number and percentage of times Negative, Trace, or 1+. All were Schistosoma mansoni egg negative by 4 Kato–Katz slides/stool sample per day, and miracidial hatching test negative throughout the 30 days.
† Egg-positive control subject. Seventeen times (94.1% of the time) this positive control subject had a CCA score of 2+ (not indicated in the Table).
Summary CCA and Kato–Katz data of the three egg-positive control subjects
| District | Follow-up days | CCA scores | Kato–Katz slides mean eggs per gram of stool (±SD) | Miracidia hatching test | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||||
| Desouk | 13* | Trace | 11.07 (12.4) | 16.6 (20.5) | 22.1 (26.7) | 29.5 (26.2) | Positive† |
| Al Riad | 16 | Trace to 1+ | 60.7 (63.5) | 63.5 (47.2) | 60.7 (55.7) | 72.0 (56.3) | Positive |
| Sidi Salem | 17 | 1+ to 2+ | 76.2 (39.1) | 88.9 (40.5) | 88.9 (52.1) | 70.6 (41.9) | Positive |
POC-CCA = point-of-care–circulating cathodic antigen.
* This egg-positive control was added on day 18 of the study because the initial egg-positive control for this district who was used on days 15–17 was seen to be a heavily infected subject (840 eggs per gram). Subsequently, that subject was replaced by a lightly infected subject who was followed up for the remainder of the study (13 days).
† One egg in one Kato–Katz slide was detected on two successive days, but the miracidial hatching tests these 2 days were negative. This is contrary to all other time points, when detection of one egg by Kato–Katz resulted in positive miracidial hatching tests.