Literature DB >> 30607205

Outcomes of the calcaneo-stop procedure for the treatment of juvenile flatfoot in young athletes.

V Pavone1, A Vescio1, C A Di Silvestri1,2, A Andreacchio3, G Sessa1, G Testa1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Flexible flatfoot (FFF) is a widespread condition in juvenile patients. If symptomatic, FFF can require surgical treatment. The calcaneo-stop procedure has shown excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes and low rates of complications. The aim of the present study was to assess the sport practice of young athletes affected by FFF having undergone the calcaneo-stop procedure.
METHODS: Between 2008 and 2016, 68 sport practitioners were bilaterally treated by the calcaneo-stop procedure, for a total of 136 FFF cases. Clinical evaluation, including the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), the Yoo et al score and The Foot & Ankle Disability Index (FADI) and FADI Sport scores were assessed. Radiographic evaluation was based on measurement of talar declination, Costa-Bertani's angle and calcaneal pitch.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 57.6 months (sd 16.8). The AOFAS score mean increased from 79.3 (sd 5.7) to 97.3 (sd 4.5) three years after surgery. The Yoo score improved from 3.1 (sd 1.0) preoperatively to 11.7 (sd 0.6) three years after surgery. The FADI Sport subscale mean improved from 74.1 (sd 10.4) preoperatively to 95.9 (sd 4.9) three years after surgery.Costa-Bertani's angle decreased from 156.1° (sd 4.2°) to 135.8° (sd 7.3°) at three years postoperatively; mean talar declination angle decreased from 44.2° (sd 6.3°) to 30.6° (sd 3.2°) at three years postoperatively and mean calcaneal pitch increased from 12.6° (sd 2.3°) to 16.3° (sd 1.3°) at three years postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: Adolescent patients who underwent the calcaneo-stop procedure reported satisfactory outcomes in terms of clinical and radiological evaluations. Moreover, our results showed an improvement of sport activity levels, with patients recovering sports activity within three months of surgery and without limitation in the execution of preferred activities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  calcaneo-stop; flexible flatfoot; sport practice; symptomatic feet; young athletes

Year:  2018        PMID: 30607205      PMCID: PMC6293325          DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.12.180032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Orthop        ISSN: 1863-2521            Impact factor:   1.548


Introduction

Flexible flatfoot is the most common paediatric condition,[1] it is physiological until ten years old and is clinically characterized by the loss of medial longitudinal arch and heel valgus.[2] It is defined as ‘flexible’ if the medial arch is restored performing the Jack and the Tip Toe tests and the heel alignment is restored when standing on tiptoe.[3] Juvenile flexible flatfoot is characterized by anatomical features including: heel valgus, subtalar joint subluxation with talus intra-rotation and plantar flexion and mid-tarsal joint abduction with navicular dorsal-subluxation. Tightness of the Achilles’ tendon could also be associated with these features.[4] Despite a high prevalence of flexible flatfoot in children and adolescents, only a small proportion of cases are symptomatic with pain, fatigue and disability.[5] Conservative treatment is preferred in most of cases with satisfying results; only in rare, selected, symptomatic and conservative-treatment-refractory cases is surgical treatment proposed. Surgical options described are: soft-tissue tensioning, arthroereisis, osteotomy and arthrodesis.[5] Arthroereisis is a widespread option of treatment of flexible flatfoot in children. Nowadays, it is performed as subtalar extra-articular (SESA or calcaneo-stop) or with a subtalar intra-articular implant. Several authors have reported on the validity, efficacy, safety and mini-invasiveness of the arthroereisis techniques.[6-9] The practise of sport has an important role to play in the improvement of mental and physical development, protects children from obesity and promotes additional health benefits.[10] Young sport practitioners have a better quality of life,[11] better brain cortical excitability[12] and have enhanced long-term neural adaptation mechanisms and increased visuo-spatial abilities.[13] The aim of this study was to assess the practise of sports in patients affected by FFF who have undergone the calcaneo-stop procedure.

Patients and methods

Eligibility criteria

Between 2008 and 2016, 326 flexible flatfeet in 216 patients were treated with the calcaneo-stop procedure at our institution.[14] According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 91 patients were eligible; during the investigation, 23 were lost at follow-up and excluded. A total of 68 treated patients were retrospectively reviewed and included in the present study. Inclusion criteria were: (a) skeletal immaturity with growth cartilage visible on preoperative foot radiographs; (b) symptomatic flexible flatfoot deformity (pain, function and limitations and/or skin lesions) not responsive to conservative treatment;[15] (c) surgical treatment with calcaneo-stop procedure; (d) bilateral treatment; and (e) all patients had participated in sports at a recreational or occasional level preoperatively, for at least three hours every week. Exclusion criteria include those patients diagnosed with neurological or neuromuscular disorders, congenital or post-traumatic flatfoot, diabetes or immunological diseases. All patients provided an informed consent to participate in the present investigation. This study was carried out according to the guidelines for Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. The cohort of 68 patients (136 feet) consisted of 38 male (55.9%) and 30 female (44.1%) patients and the mean age at time of surgery was 12.7 years (9 to 15). Practised sports were: soccer in 21 (30.9%) patients, basket in 18 (26.5%), volley in 13 (19.1%), swimming in ten (14.7%), tennis in four (5.9%) and cycling in two (2.9%).

Surgical technique

The calcaneo-stop procedure for correction of an idiopathic flexible flatfoot was indicated in patients who experienced pain during or after exercise, postural fatigue and failure of conservative treatment.[16] All the patients under general anaesthesia were placed supine and with the foot in the internal rotation position. An incision of 2 cm was made under the skin on the lateral aspect of the sinus tarsi. Drilling with a 3.2-mm drill bit was performed vertically into the calcaneus from the superior to the inferior aspect opposite to the sinus tarsi after reduction of the subtalar eversion. A 4.5-mm cortical, stainless, self-tapping screw (8-mm head) with a length of 30 mm to 35 mm (the calcaneal-stop screw) (Synthes LCP, Bettlach, Switzerland) was inserted, such that the screw head impinged against the lateral aspect of the talus, preventing eversion at the subtalar joint. The dorsiflexion of the foot was evaluated with the knee extended, once appropriate placement of the screw had been radiographically verified in the neutral position.

Sport activities return, follow-up and screw removal protocol

Within three days of the surgery, weight-bearing is allowed. All patients were subjected to the rehabilitation protocol, consisting of proprioceptive exercises and stretching, avoiding running and jumping for the subsequent two months. After four to six weeks, patients undertook clinical and radiographic follow-up. After two months postoperatively, each patient was encouraged to practise their favourite sporting activity. The calcaneo-stop screw was removed at least three years from surgery.

Clinical and radiographic assessment

Clinical and functional outcomes of all patients were evaluated, before surgery, at one and three years after surgery, using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle–Hindfoot score,[17] Yoo et al’s clinical criteria,[18] the Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for Children (OxAFQ-C)[19] and the Foot & Ankle Disability Index (FADI) and FADI Sport scores.[20] The AOFAS Ankle– Hindfoot score consists of nine items under three different categories, i.e. pain (40 points), functional aspect (50 points) and alignment (ten points), totalling 100 points. Items on pain and functional limitation are answered by the patient, while the alignment items are answered by an examiner. The Yoo et al criteria assign 0 to 3 points for the following parameters: pain or callus, forefoot abduction, longitudinal arch and hindfoot valgus. Outcomes were considered satisfactory if final score is 8 or more. The OxAFQ-C is a self-reported health status measure questionnaire used to measure subjective well-being for child patients (aged five to 16 years) affected by foot and ankle conditions using issues that are considered important to children. The OxAFQ-C consists of four domains, Physical (six items, 24 points), School and Play (four items, 16 points), Emotional (four items, 16 points) and Footwear (one item, four points), for a total of 15 items. Domain scores can be transformed to a percentage scale (0% to 100%) to aid interpretation. The FADI is a region-specific self-reporting scale of function and includes 34 items divided into two subscales, the first (FADI) consisting of 26 items about activities of daily living (ADL) and pain and the second (FADI Sport) consisting of eight items about sports activities. Each item is scored on a five-point Likert scale (4 to 0) and, thereafter, the results are converted into percentages. Higher scores represent higher levels of function for each subscale. The ADL and sports subscales are scored separately. For each patient, we recorded the times and the hours per week of sport practices before and one and three years after surgery; each sport was classified using Mitchell criteria.[21] The Mitchell classific ation of sport relates individual competitive sports to the two general types of exercise: dynamic and static. Each sport is categorized by the level of intensity (low, medium, high) of dynamic or static exercise generally required to perform that sport during competition. It also recognizes those sports that pose significant risk due to bodily collision, either because of the probability of hard impact between competitors or between a competitor and an object, projectile or the ground. All patients underwent anteroposterior (AP) and lateral weight-bearing foot radiograph preoperatively and at one and three years postoperatively. For each single patient, measurements of Kite’s angle, Costa-Bertani’s angle, talar declination and calcaneal pitch[16] were assessed in a randomly chosen foot (Fig. 1). Kite’s angle is the angle between the longitudinal axis of the calcaneus and talus. Costa-Bertani’s angle is the angle between the line formed from the lower point of the medial sesamoid to the lower point of the talonavicular joint, and the line formed between the lower point of the talonavicular joint and the lower point of the posterior calcaneal tuberosity. The talar declination angle is the angle between the collum tali axis (originating from the centre of the body of the talus and extending through the bisection of the talar neck and head) and a horizontal line extending from the plantar surface of the calcaneus to the plantar surface of the fifth metatarsal head. The calcaneal pitch is the angle between the lines extending from the inferior portion of the calcaneocuboid joint to the same horizontal line along the plantar aspect of the calcaneus to the plantar surface of the fifth metatarsal head.
Fig. 1

Clinical and radiological evaluation of an 11-year-old patient: footprint before surgery (a) and two years postoperatively (b); Kite’s angle (c,d), Costa-Bertani’s angle (e, f), talar declination (g,h) and calcaneal pitch (i,j) before surgery (left) and after two years (right).

Clinical and radiological evaluation of an 11-year-old patient: footprint before surgery (a) and two years postoperatively (b); Kite’s angle (c,d), Costa-Bertani’s angle (e, f), talar declination (g,h) and calcaneal pitch (i,j) before surgery (left) and after two years (right).

Statistical analysis

Continuous data are presented as means and standard deviations, as appropriate. The analysis of variance test and Tukey–Kramer method were used to compare the clinical assessment and radiographic measurements preoperatively and at one and three years postoperatively. The Pearson Rho correlation coefficient was used to study the influence the weekly hours of sport practice on the increase of FADI Sport values. Finally, chi-squared tests were used to compare the types of sports practiced preoperatively and at one year and three years after surgery. The selected threshold for statistical significance was p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using the 2016 GraphPad Software (GraphPad Inc, San Diego, California).

Results

Mean follow-up was 57.6 months (sd 16.8); 15 to 96). Heel valgus decreased from 130 feet (95.6%) preoperatively to 14 feet (10.3%) at final follow-up; normal footprint was recorded in 114 feet (83.8%). Following AOFAS (F2,201 = 287.51; p < 0.0001), Yoo et al (F2,201 = 2627.00; p < 0.0001), OxAFQ-C (F2,201 = 210.60; p < 0.0001), FADI (F2,201 = 372.62; p < 0.0001) and FADI Sport (F2,201= 189.32; p < 0.0001) scoring criteria, all the patients were recorded with an improvement and the maintenance of clinical outcomes (Table 1) at one and three years postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Significant statistical differences were found in the AOFAS pain category at one and three years after the surgery (Fig. 2) According to the AOFAS and Yoo et al criteria, at one-year postoperatively the heel alignment was corrected in 134 of 136 feet (98.6%) and improved in the rest of the cases (1.4%). Above 97% of the patients (132 feet) were satisfied with the treatment. All radiographic assessments; Kite’s angle (F2,201 = 203.02; p < 0.0001), Costa-Bertani’s angle (F2,201 = 210.41; p < 0.0001), talar declination (F2,201 = 213.30; p <0.0001) and calcaneal pitch (F2,201 = 368.79; p < 0.0001), were enhanced one year from the surgery (p < 0.0001) and the values were maintained at three years postoperatively (Table 2) (p < 0.0001).
Table 1

Clinical assessment, following American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), Yoo et al, Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for Children (OxAF-C), The Foot & Ankle Disability Index (FADI) and FADI Sport scores. All presented as mean and sd (range). The p-values in the table are based on ANOVA test e Tukey test.

AOFASYoo et alOxAFCFADIFADI Sport
Preoperatively79.3 sd 5.7 (69.0 to 85.0)3.1 sd 1.0 (2 to 4)88.5 sd 4.5 (80.0 to 93.0)76.1 sd 7.5 (62.5 to 81.7)74.1 sd 10.4 (50 to 81.2)
p-value pre- versus postoperativelyp < 0.0001p < 0.0001p < 0.0001p < 0.0001p < 0.0001
One-year postoperatively96.4 sd 4.5 (79 to 100)11.4 sd 0.7 (9 to 12)97.5 sd 2.5 (88.3 to 100)96.4 sd 4.4 (79.8 to 100)95.1 sd 5.7 (78.1 to 100)
p-value one year versus three years postoperativelyp > 0.05p > 0.05p > 0.05p > 0.05p > 0.05
Three-years postoperatively97.3 sd 4.5 (90 to 100)11.7 sd 0.6 (9 to 12)98.6 sd 1.8 (93.3 to 100)98.3 sd 2.7 (94.2 to 100)95.9 sd 4.9 (78.1 to 100)
p-value pre- versus three years postoperativelyp < 0.0001p < 0.0001p < 0.0001p < 0.0001p < 0.0001
Fig. 2

Clinical assessment following American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) score, Yoo et al score (%), Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for Children (OxAFQ-C) score (%), The Foot & Ankle Disability Index (FADI) and FADI Sport (%) subscale and hours of sport activities.

Table 2

Radiological assessment, following Kite’s angle, Costa-Bertani’s Angle, talar declination and calcaneal inclination. All presented as mean and sd (range). The p-values in the table are based on ANOVA test e Tukey test.

Kite’s angle (°)Costa-Bertani’s angle (°)Talar declination (°)Calcaneal inclination (°)
Preoperatively30.5 sd 1.3 (30 to 32)156.1 sd 4.2 (150 to 160)44.2 sd 6.3 (35 to 55)12.6 sd 2.3 (11 to 15)
p-value pre- versus postoperativelyp < 0.001p < 0.0001p < 0.0001p < 0.0001
One-year postoperatively24.4 sd 2.1 (22 to 29)135.3 sd 8.1 (125 to 148)29.6 sd 3.7 (26 to 34)16.9 sd 1.7 (15 to 18)
p-value one year versus three years postoperativelyp > 0.05p > 0.05p > 0.05p > 0.05
Three-years postoperatively24.6 sd 2.4 (22 to 30)135.8 sd 7.3 (125 to 149)30.6 sd 3.2 (26 to 34)16.3 sd 1.3 (15 to 18)
p-value pre- versus three years postoperativelyp < 0.0001p < 0.0001p < 0.0001p < 0.0001
Clinical assessment, following American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), Yoo et al, Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for Children (OxAF-C), The Foot & Ankle Disability Index (FADI) and FADI Sport scores. All presented as mean and sd (range). The p-values in the table are based on ANOVA test e Tukey test. Clinical assessment following American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) score, Yoo et al score (%), Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for Children (OxAFQ-C) score (%), The Foot & Ankle Disability Index (FADI) and FADI Sport (%) subscale and hours of sport activities. Radiological assessment, following Kite’s angle, Costa-Bertani’s Angle, talar declination and calcaneal inclination. All presented as mean and sd (range). The p-values in the table are based on ANOVA test e Tukey test. The mean level of sports activities per week before the surgery was 2.5 hours (sd 0.8; 1 to 3) and increased to 5.6 hours (sd 1.1; 1 to 7) at one year (p < 0.001) and to 5.7 hours (sd 1.2; 1 to 7) three years after the surgery (p < 0.001). No correlation between the weekly hours of sport practice and the increase of FADI Sport values were found one year after the surgery (r = 0.0092) and at the three-years follow-up (r = 0.0065). Following the Mitchell criteria, no significant statistical differences were found between the types of sports practiced (Table 3). In all, 37 patients started to practise sport activities regularly, increasing to 119.35% after the surgery (Table 3). Minor complications were encountered in 17 patients (12.5%); five patients (3.7%) had pain at surgical scar, four (2.9%) had local symptoms at the incision, three (1.2%) had screw loosening and four (2.9%) had superficial infections. In one case (0.73%) screw breakage was reported.
Table 3

Types of sport following Mitchell criteria preoperatively and at one-year and three-years postoperatively. The p-values in the table are based on Chi-squared test.

Type of sportIAIBICIIAIIBIICIIIAIIIBIIICNO
Preoperatively0611001002237
One-year postoperatively0112800240320
Three-years postoperatively0102700260410
p-value pre- versus one-year postoperativelyp > 0.05
p-value one-year versus three-years postoperativelyp > 0.05
p-value pre- versus three-years postoperativelyp > 0.05

NO, number of patients stopping sports due to flatfoot

Types of sport following Mitchell criteria preoperatively and at one-year and three-years postoperatively. The p-values in the table are based on Chi-squared test. NO, number of patients stopping sports due to flatfoot In all, 11 patients (22 feet) removed the screw at skeletal maturity; four patients (eight feet) removed screw before the skeletal maturity for persistent pain, screw loosening or breakage, with presence of lysis around the screw in three feet. In all, 65 patients (95.6%) were able to practise their sport, while three (4.4%) preferred to practise no-weight-bearing sports.

Discussion

Several authors have reported the outcomes after the return to sport activities in flexible flatfoot children having been treated with different surgical techniques,[16,22] but, as far as we are aware, no previously published studies have investigated the outcomes of the calcaneo-stop procedure in the treatment of juvenile flatfoot in young athletes. The main inclusion criterion in the present study was sport practise for at least one hour three times a week. In this study, clinical outcomes and sports activities were assessed in children with symptomatic flatfoot before and after calcaneo-stop procedure; only patients with bilateral involvement were enrolled, since the sport performance and the functional outcomes may be influenced by both feet. Overall, we found that patients restored their preoperative level of sport activity within one year of surgery in terms of frequency and duration. All clinical and radiological assessments measured preoperatively and one and three years postoperatively improved (p < 0.0001). All patients were able to return to sports and recreational activities, and just in a few cases minimal pain and symptoms were reported. One year from surgery, we recorded a decrease of painful symptoms, an increase in the ability to perform daily activities and the emotional sphere-related score, and also, an improvement in the sports performance of greater than 21% (Fig. 2). The mean sport activities time incresead from 2.5 hours to 5.6 hours one-year postoperatively and to 5.7 hours three years later: this could be explained by analyzing the questonnaries data. Decrease of pain and fatigue could increase the hours spent in sport practice. The orthosis removal after the surgery allows the patient to choose more efficient and comfortable sport footwear. A better body awareness, a removal of minor deformity functional impact, less flatfoot-related embarrassment and the possibility of socializing through sport could influence the calcaneo-stop treated patients’ emotional sphere improving through social interactions. An enhancement of mean sport practice time and of sport activities values were noted, but no correlations were demonstrated. We can deduce that a quantitative improvement of the sport practice following the calcaneo-stop procedure can be related to improvement in the quality of sport activities. Arthroereisis procedures were applied to limit subtalar joint movement and improve the weight-bearing position of the foot, using a movement-blocking implant into the sinus tarsi.[23] The calcaneo-stop procedure is a widely performed, studied, effectiveness-proved procedure,[14,24] considered simple, reliable and minimally invasive for the treatment of paediatric flexible flatfoot, because it allows the alignment of the talus and calcaneus, restoring a proper foot arch.[15] As several authors reported, SESA is indicated in children and adolescents with idiopathic flexible flatfeet presenting with any clinical disorder (pain, fatigue, inability to practice sports, falls, low limbs or back pain) refractory to non-surgical treatment.[1,3,15,25] Operative correction of flexible flatfoot is performed with the aim of reducing symptoms rather than to correct the foot shape deformity.[8] All mentioned symptoms could impact on the patients’ quality of life[25] but our results showed, coherently with the literature, patient satisfaction and improvement of all examined clinical and radiographic parameters. Rate of minor complications was 12.5%. Miller,[26] at surgical removal of arthroereisis implant, revealed erosion of the cartilage on the anterior leading edge of the talus. In this series, eight cases of mobilization of screw reported lysis and erosion of talus at implant removal. Recent studies have reported complication rates of 3.5% to 11%, including inappropriate implantation in asymptomatic physiologic flatfeet, malpositioning of screw, overcorrection and implant aseptic loosening, breakage or degradation of biomaterials and biologic problems, adverse reactions, infection, persistent pain and osteonecrosis of the talus and peroneal spasm.[27-29] Limitations of this study were: its retrospective nature, the lack of a control group, the mid-term follow-up, bias in clinical and radiographic evaluation and lack of objectively measurable parameters.

Conclusion

Adolescent patients who underwent the calcaneo-stop procedure report satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes. Advantages of this technique have been confirmed regarding symptom relief, short time for functional restoration and reduced invasiveness. Moreover, our results showed an early improvement and the long-term maintenance of sport activity levels, without limitation in the execution of preferred activities, confirming the effectiveness of the studied treatment.
  25 in total

Review 1.  Management of the flexible flat foot in the child: a focus on the use of osteotomies for correction.

Authors:  John Y Kwon; Mark S Myerson
Journal:  Foot Ankle Clin       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.653

Review 2.  Current topic review: subtalar arthroereisis for the correction of flexible flatfoot.

Authors:  Richard L Needleman
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 3.  Task Force 8: classification of sports.

Authors:  Jere H Mitchell; William Haskell; Peter Snell; Steven P Van Camp
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  The stop screw technique--a simple and reliable method in treating flexible flatfoot in children.

Authors:  Joerg Jerosch; Jochem Schunck; Hazem Abdel-Aziz
Journal:  Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.705

5.  Giannini prosthesis for flatfoot.

Authors:  Pedro R Gutiérrez; Manuel Herrera Lara
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.827

6.  Calcaneal lengthening for the planovalgus foot deformity in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Won Joon Yoo; Chin Youb Chung; In Ho Choi; Tae-Joon Cho; Dong Han Kim
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.324

7.  Calcaneo-stop procedure in the treatment of the juvenile symptomatic flatfoot.

Authors:  Vito Pavone; Luciano Costarella; Gianluca Testa; Giorgio Conte; Maria Riccioli; Giuseppe Sessa
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 1.286

8.  Preliminary radiographic findings and sizing implications on patients undergoing bioabsorbable subtalar arthroereisis.

Authors:  Amol Saxena; Aidan Nguyen
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.286

Review 9.  Pediatric flatfoot: cause, epidemiology, assessment, and treatment.

Authors:  David M Dare; Emily R Dodwell
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.856

10.  The Oxford ankle foot questionnaire for children: scaling, reliability and validity.

Authors:  C Morris; H A Doll; A Wainwright; T Theologis; R Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-11
View more
  11 in total

1.  Functional and radiographic comparison of subtalar arthroereisis and lateral calcaneal lengthening in the surgical treatment of flexible flatfoot in children.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Tahririan; Sina Ramtin; Pegah Taheri
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Is it possible to define reference values for radiographic parameters evaluating juvenile flatfoot deformity? A case-control study.

Authors:  Johannes Hamel; Hubert Hörterer; Norbert Harrasser
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes following surgical treatment for symptomatic pediatric flexible flat feet: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maria Anna Smolle; Martin Svehlik; Katharina Regvar; Andreas Leithner; Tanja Kraus
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome in Young Female Athletes: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Vito Pavone; Andrea Vescio; Flora Maria Chiara Panvini; Ludovico Lucenti; Alessia Caldaci; Marco Sapienza; Federico Canavese; Gianluca Testa
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2022-04-15

5.  Treatment for Flexible Flatfoot in Children With Subtalar Arthroereisis and Soft Tissue Procedures.

Authors:  Bing Li; Wenbao He; Guangrong Yu; Haichao Zhou; Jiang Xia; Youguang Zhao; Hui Zhu; Tao Yu; Yunfeng Yang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.418

6.  Arthroereisis in juvenile flexible flatfoot: Which device should we implant? A systematic review of literature published in the last 5 years.

Authors:  Andrea Vescio; Gianluca Testa; Mirko Amico; Claudio Lizzio; Marco Sapienza; Piero Pavone; Vito Pavone
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2021-06-18

7.  Endosinotarsal device exerts a better postoperative correction in Meary's angle than exosinotarsal screw from a meta-analysis in pediatric flatfoot.

Authors:  Chiun-Hua Hsieh; Chia-Che Lee; Tzu-Hao Tseng; Kuan-Wen Wu; Jia-Feng Chang; Ting-Ming Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Discrepancy between true ankle dorsiflexion and gait kinematics and its association with severity of planovalgus foot deformity.

Authors:  Ki Hyuk Sung; Chin Youb Chung; Kyoung Min Lee; Ki Bum Kwon; Jeong Hyun Lee; Moon Seok Park
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Operative versus nonoperative treatment in children with painful rigid flatfoot and talocalcaneal coalition.

Authors:  Giovanni Luigi Di Gennaro; Stefano Stallone; Eleonora Olivotto; Paola Zarantonello; Marina Magnani; Tullia Tavernini; Stefano Stilli; Giovanni Trisolino
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Sport Ability during Walking Age in Clubfoot-Affected Children after Ponseti Method: A Case-Series Study.

Authors:  Vito Pavone; Andrea Vescio; Alessia Caldaci; Annalisa Culmone; Marco Sapienza; Mattia Rabito; Federico Canavese; Gianluca Testa
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.