Hisayoshi Ohta1,2, Yonggang Qi1, Kenichi Ohba2, Tatsushi Toyooka3, Rui-Sheng Wang1,3. 1. Department of Environmental, Occupational Health and Toxicology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kitasato University, Japan. 2. 2Department of Environmental, Occupational Health and Toxicology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Japan. 3. 3Industrial Toxicology and Health Effects Research Group, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan.
Abstract
The role of metallothionein (MT)-like cadmium (Cd) binding protein (MTLCdBP) in protecting the testes against Cd toxicity was examined. In the acute Cd exposure treatment, cadmium chloride was intraperitoneally injected at 2 mg Cd/kg to Wistar male rats. In the chronic Cd toxicity treatments, 20 mg Cd/kg/d was orally administered for 5 d a week for 5, 10, and 15 wk. MT (-I,-II) and MTLCdBP were measured using ELISA and Cd-Hem methods, respectively. Testicular tissues were immunostained with antibodies of MT-I,-II, MT-III, and MTLCdBP. Expression of HO1, OGG, iNOS, COX2, and p53 was measured by RT-PCR. Cd concentration in the testis increased dose-dependently in response to Cd exposure. MTLCdBP concentration increased markedly with increasing Cd accumulation. Significant increases in expression of iNOS, HO1, COX2, and OGG1 were observed in the acute exposure treatment. In the chronic oral administration group, expression of MT-I, MT-II, MT-III, iNOS, HO1, and COX2 did not change. Positive immunostaining of MTLCdBP was observed in testicular interstitial tissue. In the testis protected from Cd toxicity, MTLCdBP induction increased significantly with increasing Cd accumulation. Our results suggest that MTLCdBP plays an important role in protecting the testis against Cd toxicity.
The role of metallothionein (MT)-like cadmium (Cd) binding protein (MTLCdBP) in protecting the testes against Cdtoxicity was examined. In the acute Cd exposure treatment, cadmium chloride was intraperitoneally injected at 2 mg Cd/kg to Wistar male rats. In the chronic Cdtoxicity treatments, 20 mg Cd/kg/d was orally administered for 5 d a week for 5, 10, and 15 wk. MT (-I,-II) and MTLCdBP were measured using ELISA and Cd-Hem methods, respectively. Testicular tissues were immunostained with antibodies of MT-I,-II, MT-III, and MTLCdBP. Expression of HO1, OGG, iNOS, COX2, and p53 was measured by RT-PCR. Cd concentration in the testis increased dose-dependently in response to Cd exposure. MTLCdBP concentration increased markedly with increasing Cd accumulation. Significant increases in expression of iNOS, HO1, COX2, and OGG1 were observed in the acute exposure treatment. In the chronic oral administration group, expression of MT-I, MT-II, MT-III, iNOS, HO1, and COX2 did not change. Positive immunostaining of MTLCdBP was observed in testicular interstitial tissue. In the testis protected from Cdtoxicity, MTLCdBP induction increased significantly with increasing Cd accumulation. Our results suggest that MTLCdBP plays an important role in protecting the testis against Cdtoxicity.
Cadmium (Cd) is an environmental pollutant and is well-known as the cause of itai-itai
disease. In the industrial workplace, respiratory exposure to Cd is known to cause pulmonary
edema and renal dysfunction. Even today, occupational Cd exposure occurs during mining for
metals or in the manufacture of pigments and batteries utilizing Cd. The general population
can be exposed to Cd through contaminated drinking water, food, and smoking habits.
Industrial activities, such as metal smelting and refining, and municipal waste incineration
also release Cd into the atmosphere as Cd oxide, chloride, or sulfide1,2,3).Cd is a highly toxic heavy metal and may cause severe damage to embryos and the
reproductive organs of adults, including both the ovaries and the testes4). The testes are especially sensitive to Cdtoxicity, with the metal causing hemorrhagic inflammation and edema, followed by necrosis
and mortality. Testicular damage induced by acute Cdtoxicity has been studied by
Parizek5), but the precise mechanisms
underlying Cdtoxicity to the testes remain unclear.The toxicity of Cd can be mitigated by pre-administration of small doses of Cd before
exposure to toxic doses and by simultaneous administration of Cd and selenium6,7,8). These protective mechanisms may involve the
participation of metal-binding proteins, the high molecular selenium-cadmium complex, and
metallothionein (MT)9, 10). MT in the testes is reduced by Cd injection,
whereas in chronic oral administration of Cd, MT is induced and increases as a response to
Cd accumulation in testicular organs. However, although the MT concentration in the testis
is higher than that in the liver and the kidney, the testis is very sensitive to injected
Cd9,10,11,12).
Therefore, the question remains whether MT in the testis is sufficient to protect against Cdtoxicity.In addition, the presence of iso-MT-I,-II, and -III in the testis is reported from MT gene
expression; however, the role of MT proteins and whether their induction is in response to
Cd accumulation are not clear. The MT-like Cd-binding protein (MTLCdBP) is also present in
the testis9, 11, 12). The heat-stable,
metal-binding MTLCdBP is low in cysteine, in contrast to cysteine-rich MT, and is induced
and synthesized in response to Cd accumulation in the testis9, 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20). In rodents, MT-I/-II has been localized in spermatogenic, Sertoli,
and interstitial cells, although there are discrepancies in their precise cellular
distribution, and their role in protein induction is not clear18, 20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28). In addition, Cdtoxicity in the testis was not reduced in MT-Itransgenic mice even though the expression of
MT-I was 5.2-fold higher than in the wild type29). Therefore, the high susceptibility of the testis to Cdtoxicity
may not be entirely related to the levels of MT-I/-II but is possibly related to the genetic
background30). It remains unclear why
the testis displays a relatively high basal level of MT-I/-II compared to other organs
(e.g., the liver), and it has been suggested that it fails to detoxify Cd.Tesmin, a metallothionein-like protein, has also been reported in the testis17). Although it has been suggested that
tesmin participates in spermatogenesis, more recently, it has been classified as a member of
the CXC-hinge CXC family28, 31,32,33). In normal mice, tesmin has been detected in the cytoplasm
in pachytene spermatocytes, and is translocated to the nucleus in the late pachytene or
diplotene spermatocytes. It is also suggested that tesmin may have some characteristics
related to MT-I/-II, such as metal sensitivity, since the expression of tesmin appears to be
responsive to Cd. Studies have found that tesmin in spermatocytes is affected by Cd
treatment31, 32). Nonetheless, the role(s) of MTs and tesmin in the testis remains
unclear.In this study, we aimed to clarify the role of MTLCdBP in protecting against Cdtoxicity.
We measured the separation of MT and MTLCdBP in the testis by using a combination of the
Cd-Hem and the ELISA methods. The former is a measurement method using physical properties
(heat stability, Cd binding) of MT, and the latter uses MT-I,-II antibody. In addition, we
examined the participation of MTLCdBP in the protective mechanism against Cdtoxicity by
comparing the distribution of these proteins by immunostaining MT-I,-II, and -III and
MTLCdBP in testicular tissue. This was followed by an investigation of gene expression of
MT-I, MT-II, and MT-III and tesmin in the testes.
Materials and Methods
Animals and Cd administration
The present study was approved by the animal ethics committee of Kitasato University,
Japan. Five-week-old male Wistar rats were purchased from CLEA Japan, Inc. The animals
were fed commercial pellets (CE-2, CLEA Japan, Inc.) and were given water ad
libitum. They were kept in temperature- and humidity-controlled rooms on a 12 h
light/dark cycle during the experimental period. After preliminary breeding for 1 wk, the
rats were divided into experimental groups of five animals each and used in the experiment
from the age of 6 wk.Animals were divided into three experimental groups of five animals each, and distilled
water was administered to the control group. In the acute Cdtoxicity treatment (Cd (ip)
group), cadmium chloride (CdCl2) was intraperitoneally injected into rats (five
per group) at a rate of 2 mg Cd/kg. In the Cd pretreatment group (Cd (ip-ip) group),
0.2 mg Cd/kg was injected as a pretreatment 24 h before injection of the toxic dose of
2 mg Cd/kg. In the chronic Cd oral administration experiment, 30 animals were divided into
groups with five animals each, and distilled water was orally administered to the control
group. In the chronic Cdtoxicity treatments, 20 mg Cd/kg was orally administered to rats
for five days a week for five, 10, and 15 wk (groups Oral5W, Oral10W, and Oral15W,
respectively). Twenty-four hours after the final administration of Cd, the animals were
euthanized by cardiac blood collection under somnopentyl anesthesia. The animals were
perfused with physiological saline from the heart to remove residual blood from the organs
and the testes were collected immediately.
Measurement of MT and MTLCdBP concentration
MTLCdBP concentration was measured by the Cd-Hem method34). MT was measured by the ELISA method using the antibody of iso-MT
(I, II)35) (Metallothionein ELISA kit,
Frontier Institute Co., Ltd., Hokkaido, Japan).Gene expression of MT and tesmin and measurement of clinical biochemical indicesGene expression levels of MT and tesmin17, 31,32,33) and biochemical indices were measured by
RT-PCR. Glutathione (GSH) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) in the testis were measured
as biochemical indicators11). Total RNA
was isolated from the testis with ISOGEN (NIPPON GENE Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), according
to the manufacturer’s instructions. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthetized from 1
µg of RNA using a PrimeScript®II 1st strand cDNA Synthesis
kit (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan). qPCR was performed using a Fast SYBR®
Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and a thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City,
CA, USA).Gene-specific primers used for amplification of ratMT-I (GenBank accession no.
NM_138826), MT-II (M11794), MT-III (NM_053968)36), MTL5 (NM_001012069), iNOS (NM_012611), COX-2 (NM_017232), HO 1
(NM_012580), OGG1 (NM_030870), p53 (NM_030989), β-ACTIN (BC063166) and GAPDH (AF106860)
cDNAs were as follows: MT-I forward (F), 5′-GACTGCCTTCTTGTCGCTTA-3′; MT-I reverse
(R),5′-AGCAGCACTGTTCGTCACTT-3′; MT-II-F5′ACTCTACAGCGATCTCTCGT-3′; MT-II-R
5′-GGCTAGGTTCCTTACGTTGT-3′; MT-III-F 5′-TTGCCTGGA GGAACTAAGCT-3′; MT-III-R
5′-TTCACATAGGCTGTGTGGGA-3′; MTL5-F 5′-AGGAATCCTGCTGCAAGTTC-3′; MTL5-R
5′-TCCGTTATCGACCTGTGTGA-3′; iNOS-F 5′- CACCTCGGATATCTCTTGCA-3′; iNOS-R 5′-ATGAGCTCATCCAGAGTGAG-3′; COX-2-F
5′-TACGTGTTGACGTCCAGATC-3′; COX-2-R 5′-TCCTCGCTTCTGATCTGTCT-3′; HO1-F AGGTTGCGCAGAAGGCCAT-3′; HO1-R 5′-GTCTCTGCAGAGGTAGTATC-3′; OGG1-F
5′-GCAGATCAAGTGTGGACACT-3′; OGG1-R 5′-CAGTGATGCGAGCAATGTTG-3′; p53-F
5′-CCAAGTCTGTTATGTGCACG-3′; p53-R 5′-TGTCGTCCAGATACTCAGCA-3′; beta-ACTIN-F
5′-TCCTCCCTGGAGAAGAGCTA-3′; beta-ACTIN-R 5′-ACTCCTGCTTGCTGATCCAC-3′; GAPDH-F
5′-AGCTGAACGGGAAGCTCACT-3′; GAPDH-R 5′-ATGAGGTCCACCACCCTGTT-3′.
Immunohistochemical staining
Testis tissues collected were fixed in formalin and made into paraffin blocks with a
Sakura automatic packaging machine (VIP-5Jr, Sakura Finetek). Three consecutive sections,
each three microns, were obtained with a Yamato microtome and stained with a VENTANA
automatic immunostaining apparatus (Roche). The primary antibodies, anti-MT-I,-II (rabbit,
polyclonal) and anti-MT-III (mouse, monoclonal), were obtained from Frontier Research
Institute, Inc. The antibody of MTLCdBP (rabbit, polyclonal) used was the antiserum of
MTLCdBP protein prepared and purified from the testis in our laboratory9, 12, 37).
Image analysis of immunohistochemical-staining samples of testis tissue
The proportion of tissue positively stained for MT and MTLCdBP was observed using a light
microscope (Olympus BH 2). The observation visual field was analyzed by setting it to 10
to 12 visual fields for testicular tissue and 3 to 5 visual fields for stromal cells.
Images of the observed field were obtained with a CMOS camera (ARTCAM-130MI, ARTRAY, Inc.)
and software (AU-UMMF, ARTRAY Inc.). The image was selected by using image processing
software (Adobe Photoshop ver. 7.0.1), and image analysis software (Scion Image for
Windows) was used to select the stained area ratio of the parenchymal tissue, excluding
the vacuoles.
Measurement of elements
The concentrations of Cd, zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) in the testis were
measured using flame and flameless methods with an atomic absorption photometer (Hitachi
Z-5010) after wet-ashing the tissue with nitric acid.
Statistical analysis
Results are shown as mean and standard deviation. Data were analyzed using one-way
analysis of variance (ANOVA), with Scheffé and Fisher’s PLSD post hoc tests at
significance level p<0.05. In addition, where necessary, binary data
were analyzed using analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction.
Results
Cd concentrations in the testes increased with increasing Cd exposure under both acute
exposure by injection and chronic exposure by oral administration. In the oral Cd
administration group, Cd concentration in the testes was about 5.3 times higher than that in
the Cd acute injection administration group. However, testicular disorders, like hemorrhagic
inflammation or edema, were not found (Fig. 1). On the other hand, Fe concentration increased significantly in the
acute exposure group, and Cu concentration decreased in the chronic exposure group against
the rise in Cd concentration in the testes (Table 1). Hemorrhagic disorders and edema of the testes were observed
with acute Cd exposure, but testicular disorder was reduced when administration of a large
amount of Cd was preceded by small-dose Cd pretreatment, indicating a protective effect.
Testicular weight (both uncorrected and corrected for body weight) increased due to
hemorrhagic inflammation and edema in the acute Cd exposure group (Cd (ip)). In the chronic
oral Cd administration group, testicular damage, such as that seen in the acute Cd exposure
group, was not observed (Fig. 1, Table 1; similar results have been reported
previously)11).
Fig. 1.
Cadmium (Cd) concentration in the testis after Cd exposure by intraperitoneal
injection (ip) or oral administration in Wistar rats.
Cont: control group injected with distilled water; Cd (ip): acute Cd toxicity
treatment at 2 mg Cd/kg; Cd (ip-ip): Cd pretreatment at 0.2 mg Cd/kg 24 h prior to
treatment at 2 mg Cd/kg; chronic toxicity treatments involving oral administration
of 20 mg Cd/kg/d 5 days a week for 5 (Oral5W), 10 (Oral10W), and 15 (Oral15W)
wk.
*Significantly different from the control at p<0.05. by ANOVA
followed by the Scheffé test or Fisher’s PLSD test.
Table 1.
Testis weight, the percentage of testis to body weight and the concentration of
zinc (Zn), copper (Cu) and iron (Fe) in the testis after the acute (ip-injection)
and chronic (oral administration) exposure of cadmium (Cd)
Experimental group
Control
Cd (ip)
Cd-Cd (ip-ip)
Oralcontrol
5 wk Cd
Oral control
10 wk Cd
Oral control
15 wk Cd
Testis weight (g)
3.17 ± 0.28
3.56 ± 1.01*
3.36 ± 1.31
3.33 ± 0.13
3.09 ± 0.22
3.39 ± 0.33
2.70 ± 0.35
3.31 ± 0.22
3.12 ± 0.22
Testis weight to body weight (%)
0.91 ± 0.06
1.03 ± 0.06*
1.02 ± 0.11
0.94 ± 0.05
1.10 ± 0.06
0.88 ± 0.02
1.05 ± 0.10
0.78 ± 0.03
0.96 ± 0.06
Zn (μg/g)
20.4 ± 1.4
20.2 ± 2.8
25.1 ± 3.5
23.4 ± 2.6
19.9 ± 1.0
25.5 ± 2.8
23.2 ± 0.7
24.2 ± 1.2
22.8 ± 0.7
Cu (μg/g)
1.30 ± 0.54
1.03 ± 0.35
1.27 ± 0.27
1.75 ± 0.1
0.92 ± 0.26
1.77 ± 0.1
0.87 ± 0.25*
1.76 ± 0.2
0.48 ± 0.11*
Fe (μg/g)
16.3 ± 2.9
41.1 ± 25.8*
27.7 ± 5.8*
16.2 ± 1.9
12.5 ± 0.6
22.2 ± 1.8
14.4 ± 1.4
25.7 ± 2.6
18.0 ± 1.1
*Significantly different to the control group at p<0.05 by
ANOVA-Bonferroni’s Multiple comparison test and Scheffé test.
Cadmium (Cd) concentration in the testis after Cd exposure by intraperitoneal
injection (ip) or oral administration in Wistar rats.Cont: control group injected with distilled water; Cd (ip): acute Cdtoxicity
treatment at 2 mg Cd/kg; Cd (ip-ip): Cd pretreatment at 0.2 mg Cd/kg 24 h prior to
treatment at 2 mg Cd/kg; chronic toxicity treatments involving oral administration
of 20 mg Cd/kg/d 5 days a week for 5 (Oral5W), 10 (Oral10W), and 15 (Oral15W)
wk.*Significantly different from the control at p<0.05. by ANOVA
followed by the Scheffé test or Fisher’s PLSD test.*Significantly different to the control group at p<0.05 by
ANOVA-Bonferroni’s Multiple comparison test and Scheffé test.GSH concentration and GST activity of detoxification-related indicators showed a decrease
in the Cd (ip) group due to Cdtoxicity (Table
2). Significant increases in the expression of iNOS, HO1, COX2, and OGG1 were
observed in the Cd (ip) group. Increased expression of HO1 gene was observed in the Cd
(ip-ip) group. There was a significant decrease in p53 expression in the Cd (ip) and Cd
(ip-ip) groups. On the other hand, disorders caused by Cd in the chronic Cd oral
administration group did not tend to change iNOS, HO1, or COX2 gene expression, although a
significant increase was observed in iNOS at week 10 and COX2 at week 15. In addition,
expression of the OGG1 gene decreased at 15 wk (Table
2).
Table 2.
Glutathione concentration, enzyme activity, and relative gene expression after
cadmium exposure by ip-injection and oral administration
Experimental group
Control
Cd (ip)
Cd-Cd (ip-ip)
Oral 5 wk control
Oral 5 wk
Oral 10 wk control
Oral 10 wk
Oral 15 wk control
Oral 15 wk
GSH (μmol/g)
3.05 ± 0.24
1.62 ± 0.93*
3.05 ± 0.24
3.08 ± 0.40
3.28 ± 0.67
3.42 ± 0.32
3.06 ± 0.64
3.64 ± 0.18
3.50 ± 0.41
GST activity (nmol/min/g)
3.38 ± 1.52
1.92 ± 0.98*
2.11 ± 0.64
2.33 ± 0.51
2.57 ± 0.75
2.31 ± 0.47
2.78 ± 0.35
2.65 ± 0.28
2.78 ± 0.39
iNOS (/β-act)
45.7 ± 36.1
283.33 ± 0.04*
44.3 ± 69.5
45.7 ± 36.1
138.1 ± 88.2
41.3 ± 37.7
273.4 ± 388.8*
75.2 ± 41.9
43.9 ± 46.2
COX2 (β-act)
101.3 ± 78.8
224.5 ± 102.1*
63.4 ± 63.4
101.3 ± 78.8
95.6 ± 30.4
44.1 ± 19.6
73.5 ± 54.4
62.9 ± 27.1
286.4 ± 249.2*
HO1 (β-act)
11.9 ± 2.9
13.8 ± 2.6*
17.1 ± 6.0*
11.9 ± 2.9
8.9 ± 0.7
19.4 ± 5.2
11.5 ± 4.9
9.8 ± 0.8
14.7 ± 5.5
P53 (βact)
7.2 ± 1.9
1.8 ± 0.6*
2.3 ± 0.03*
7.2 ± 1.9
7.2 ± 0.5
5.2 ± 1.1
6.6 ± 1.1
6.8 ± 0.6
5.4 ± 0.8
OGG1 (βact)
182.2 ± 41.6
223.0 ± 31.0*
310 ± 65.0
182.2 ± 41.6
227.0 ± 19.5
201.7 ± 46.3
226.6 ± 28.4
236.3 ± 28.0
170.9 ± 29.3*
*Significantly different to the control group at p<0.05 by
ANOVA-Bonferroni’s Multiple comparison test or Scheffé-test.
*Significantly different to the control group at p<0.05 by
ANOVA-Bonferroni’s Multiple comparison test or Scheffé-test.MT concentrations in the testes measured by ELISA did not increase with increasing Cd
concentration in both the acute and chronic exposure groups. However, MTLCdBP concentration
in the testes, measured by the Cd-Hem method as Cd-bonded heat-stable protein, increased
significantly with increasing Cd concentration (Fig.
2). In the Cd (ip) group, MT and MTLCdBP concentrations showed a decreasing trend,
consistent with the results of a previous study11) when large doses of Cd were administered
by injection. However, in the Cd (ip-ip) group, MT and MTLCdBP concentrations did not change
compared to the control group (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Concentration of metallothionein and metallothionein-like Cd-binding protein in the
testis after Cd exposure by ip injection and oral administration.
*Significantly different to the control group at p<0.05 by ANOVA-
Scheffé-test.
**Significantly different to the MT-I,-II,-III group at p<0.05 by
ANOVA- Scheffé-test.
Concentration of metallothionein and metallothionein-like Cd-binding protein in the
testis after Cd exposure by ip injection and oral administration.*Significantly different to the control group at p<0.05 by ANOVA-
Scheffé-test.**Significantly different to the MT-I,-II,-III group at p<0.05 by
ANOVA- Scheffé-test.Expression of Mt-I, Mt-II, Mt-III, and Tesmin (MTL5) in the testis was examined for the
chronic Cd-exposed group, whose MTLCdBP concentration increased with increasing Cd
accumulation. However, all these genes did not show any change in expression corresponding
to Cd concentrations in the testes. Expression of MT-I gene was higher than the expression
of MT-II and -III. MT protein concentration measured by the ELISA method did not increase
(Figs. 2 and
3). In the acute exposure group, an increase in expression of the MT-II gene was
observed, although it is not clear whether this was due to strong stimulation caused by Cdtoxicity. Conversely, MT-III gene expression was decreased by Cdtoxicity (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Relative gene expression of MT-I,-II,-III and tesmin (MTL5) in testis after acute and
chronic exposure of cadmium.
Cont: control group injected with distilled water; Cd (ip): acute Cd toxicity
treatment at 2 mg Cd/kg; Cd (ip-ip): Cd pretreatment at 0.2 mg Cd/kg 24 h prior to
treatment at 2 mg Cd/kg; chronic toxicity treatments involving oral administration of
20 mg Cd/kg/d 5 d a week for 5 (Oral5W), 10 (Oral10W), and 15 (Oral15W) wk.
Control group for chronic oral Cd administration was shown as the average value for
each control group at 5, 10, and 15 wk.
*Significantly different from the control at p<0.05. by ANOVA
followed by the Scheffé test or Fisher’s PLSD test.
Relative gene expression of MT-I,-II,-III and tesmin (MTL5) in testis after acute and
chronic exposure of cadmium.Cont: control group injected with distilled water; Cd (ip): acute Cdtoxicity
treatment at 2 mg Cd/kg; Cd (ip-ip): Cd pretreatment at 0.2 mg Cd/kg 24 h prior to
treatment at 2 mg Cd/kg; chronic toxicity treatments involving oral administration of
20 mg Cd/kg/d 5 d a week for 5 (Oral5W), 10 (Oral10W), and 15 (Oral15W) wk.Control group for chronic oral Cd administration was shown as the average value for
each control group at 5, 10, and 15 wk.*Significantly different from the control at p<0.05. by ANOVA
followed by the Scheffé test or Fisher’s PLSD test.In the immunostaining assay, positive staining of MT-I,-II, MT-III, and MTLCdBP showed an
increase in response to increasing Cd concentration. In addition, the degree of positive
staining was in descending order of MTLCdBP>MT-III>MT-I,-II. That is, the MTLCdBP
antibody prepared by us showed more positive staining than MT-I,-II, and MT-III (Figs. 4–7). When comparing the distribution of positive immunostaining within testicular
tissue, there was no difference in the degree of immunostaining among MT-I,-II, MT-III, and
MTLCdBP in parenchymal tissues. MT-III and MTLCdBP showed clearer positive immunostaining
than MT-I,-II but the difference was not statistically significant (Fig. 5). However, a significant difference in positive immunostaining was observed between
MT-III and MTLCdBP in interstitial tissue. An increase in positive immunostaining of
MT-I,-II and MT-III was observed at 15 wk after Cd administration. In particular, positive
staining of MT-III and MTLCdBP showed a significant increase at 15 wk (Fig. 6).
Fig. 4.
Immunohistochemical staining of metallothionein-I,-II (MT-I,-II), -III (MT-III), and
metallothionein-like cadmium-binding protein (MTLCdBP) in the testes of Wistar rats
subjected to chronic cadmium (Cd) exposure.
Control: administered with distilled water.
Cd 10 wk and Cd 15 wk oral administration: oral administration of 20 mg Cd/kg/d 5 d a
week for 10 (Oral10W), and 15 (Oral15W) wk.
Brown color in the tissue indicates positive staining.
Fig. 7.
Positive immunostaining of metallothionein (MT)-like cadmium-binding protein
(MTLCdBP) in testis (testicular interstitial and parenchymal tissues) after oral
cadmium administration.
P MTLCdBP: parenchymal MTLCdBP; I MTLCdBP: interstitial MTLCdBP.
*Significantly different to the control group at p<0.05 by ANOVA-
Scheffé-test.
**Significantly different to the MT-I, II, III group at p<0.05 by
ANOVA- Scheffé-test.
Fig. 5.
Positive immunostaining of metallothionein (MT)-I,-II,-III and metallothionein-like
cadmium-binding protein (MTLCdBP) in testicular parenchymal tissue after oral cadmium
administration.
Cont: control. Cadmium (Cd) 10 wk and Cd 15 wk: oral administration of 20 mg Cd/kg/d
5 d a week for 10 and 15 wk.
Fig. 6.
Positive immunostaining of metallothionein (MT)-I,-II,-III and metallothionein-like
cadmium-binding protein (MTLCdBP) in testicular interstitial tissue after oral cadmium
administration.
Cont: control. Cadmium (Cd) 10 wk and Cd 15 wk: oral administration of 20 mg
Cd/kg/day 5 d a week for 10 and 15 wk.
*Significantly different to the control group at p<0.05 by ANOVA-
Scheffé-test.
**Significantly different to the MT-I,-II,-III group at p<0.05 by
ANOVA- Scheffé-test.
Immunohistochemical staining of metallothionein-I,-II (MT-I,-II), -III (MT-III), and
metallothionein-like cadmium-binding protein (MTLCdBP) in the testes of Wistar rats
subjected to chronic cadmium (Cd) exposure.Control: administered with distilled water.Cd 10 wk and Cd 15 wk oral administration: oral administration of 20 mg Cd/kg/d 5 d a
week for 10 (Oral10W), and 15 (Oral15W) wk.Brown color in the tissue indicates positive staining.Positive immunostaining of metallothionein (MT)-I,-II,-III and metallothionein-like
cadmium-binding protein (MTLCdBP) in testicular parenchymal tissue after oral cadmium
administration.Cont: control. Cadmium (Cd) 10 wk and Cd 15 wk: oral administration of 20 mg Cd/kg/d
5 d a week for 10 and 15 wk.Positive immunostaining of metallothionein (MT)-I,-II,-III and metallothionein-like
cadmium-binding protein (MTLCdBP) in testicular interstitial tissue after oral cadmium
administration.Cont: control. Cadmium (Cd) 10 wk and Cd 15 wk: oral administration of 20 mg
Cd/kg/day 5 d a week for 10 and 15 wk.*Significantly different to the control group at p<0.05 by ANOVA-
Scheffé-test.**Significantly different to the MT-I,-II,-III group at p<0.05 by
ANOVA- Scheffé-test.Considering the possibility of cross-reaction between the MTLCdBP antibody and the MT-I,-II
and MT-III antibodies, the intensity of immunostaining of MT-I,-II and MT-III was subtracted
from the intensity of immunostaining of MTLCdBP before comparison. As a result, the positive
staining of interstitial tissue was stronger than that of parenchymal tissue; in particular,
it showed a significant increase at 15 wk after Cd administration (Fig. 7).Positive immunostaining of metallothionein (MT)-like cadmium-binding protein
(MTLCdBP) in testis (testicular interstitial and parenchymal tissues) after oral
cadmium administration.P MTLCdBP: parenchymal MTLCdBP; I MTLCdBP: interstitial MTLCdBP.*Significantly different to the control group at p<0.05 by ANOVA-
Scheffé-test.**Significantly different to the MT-I, II, III group at p<0.05 by
ANOVA- Scheffé-test.Furthermore, a positive relationship was found in between positive immunostaining of
MTLCdBP protein in interstitial tissue and MTLCdBP protein concentration measured by Cd-Hem
method and Cd concentration. Positive MTLCdBP immunostaining also increased significantly
with increasing concentrations of MTLCdBP protein and Cd (Fig. 8).
Fig. 8.
Relationship between the positive immunostaining percentage of metallothionein-like
cadmium-binding protein (MTLCdBP) and the concentration of Cd and MTLCdBP in the
testicular interstitial tissue and parenchymal tissue after oral cadmium
administration.
C: Control: administered with detailed water.
MTLCdBP: MTLCdBP protein measured by Cd-Hem method.
*Significantly different to the control group (C) at p<0.05 by
ANOVA-Scheffé-test for positive immunostaining percentage of MTLCdBP-(MT-I,-II, and
-III).
**Significantly different to the control group (C) at p<0.05 by
ANOVA-Scheffé-test for MTLCdBP protein measured.
Relationship between the positive immunostaining percentage of metallothionein-like
cadmium-binding protein (MTLCdBP) and the concentration of Cd and MTLCdBP in the
testicular interstitial tissue and parenchymal tissue after oral cadmium
administration.C: Control: administered with detailed water.MTLCdBP: MTLCdBP protein measured by Cd-Hem method.*Significantly different to the control group (C) at p<0.05 by
ANOVA-Scheffé-test for positive immunostaining percentage of MTLCdBP-(MT-I,-II, and
-III).**Significantly different to the control group (C) at p<0.05 by
ANOVA-Scheffé-test for MTLCdBP protein measured.
Discussion
MTLCdBP (Cd binding, heat stable, low cysteine, low molecular weight protein), eluted in
the MT fraction by Sephadex G-75 gel filtration, protects the testes from hemorrhagic
inflammatory disorder caused by acute Cdtoxicity. During chronic oral administration of Cd,
this protein is inducibly synthesized in the testes, depending on the amount of Cd
accumulation11). Therefore, it is
important to clarify the presence and role of heat stable metal-binding protein in the
testes since testicular tissue is susceptible to heat stimulation and heat action affects
sperm production38, 39). In addition, since MT binds to essential elements such as Zn and
Cu and is thought to be related to the cellular homeostasis of these two elements and fetal
function and growth, understanding the role of MT and MTLCdBP is an important area of
research. Although Mt-I, Mt-II, and Mt-III are present in the testes, induction of MT
protein corresponding to Cd accumulation has so far not been reported. Furthermore, whether
MTLCdBP is an MT protein is still not clear.We found that acute Cdtoxicity causing hemorrhagic inflammation and edema was alleviated
by pretreatment with a small amount of Cd, confirming the results of a previous study11) (Table 1; unreported results). On the other hand, Cdtoxicity by chronic oral
administration did not show significant toxicological effects, assessed through clinical
biochemical examination and gene expression of indicator substances related to inflammation
and toxicity protection, despite the elevated testicular concentration of Cd (Tables 1 and
2; Fig. 1).Expression of Mt-I, Mt-II, and Mt-III in the testes did not increase with increasing Cd
concentration (Figs 2 and 3). On the other hand, the increase in the concentration of MTLCdBP
corresponded to the increase in Cd accumulation (Fig.
2). The expression of tesmin, which is thought to be involved in spermatogenesis,
appears to be responsive to Cd, suggesting that it has some characteristics related to
MT-I/-II, such as metal sensitivity. Nonetheless, the roles of testicular MT and tesmin have
not been determined so far31, 32). In our study, expression of the tesmin gene did not
increase, indicating that it may not be involved in alleviating Cdtoxicity (Fig. 3), i.e., since there was no change in tesmin
gene expression, it may not be directly involved in the Cdtoxicity reduction mechanism. On
the other hand, a lack of MT-III may contribute to protection against frost damage of the
testes from Cd, as MT-III null mice showed reduced Cd-induced testicular toxicity. In
addition, some studies using transgenicMT-I overexpressing mice and MT-I/-II null mice have
shown that MT-I and MT-II may not have a protective effect against Cd-induced testicular
injury19, 20, 28, 29).Although MT-III is known to be unresponsive to MT-I and MT-II inducers, there are several
reports showing that MT-III expression is induced in the brain by testosterone, zinc, and
mercury vapor40,41,42). Since MT-III mRNA levels
decreased after orchiectomy, but the control levels were maintained by testosterone and MT
was expressed mainly in basal cells with regulation by testosterone, it has been suggested
that heavy metals affect and induce MT in the proximal region of the epididymis. However,
MT-III mRNA levels were not affected by Cd treatment41). Although the MT concentration in the testes is higher than that in
the liver and the kidney, induced synthesis of MT by Cd administration is not observed, and
it is reported to decrease by acute Cd exposure11). On the other hand, MTLCdBP is inducibly synthesized by long-term
oral administration of Cd, and the composition ratio of cysteine is markedly different from
that of MT11, 28).The above studies and our results show that in Cd exposure by chronic oral administration
under normal physiological conditions, unlike in the case of acute Cd exposure by injection,
MTLCdBP is inducibly synthesized in the testis even if Cd accumulates in a dose-dependent
manner. Cd may be bound by MTLCdBP, and thus Cdtoxicity may be alleviated. We found that
MTLCdBP showed more positive staining than MT-I,-II and MT-III, and its induction and
distribution in testicular interstitial tissue were significantly increased compared to
those of MT-I,-II and MT-III (Figs. 4, 5, 6, 7). MTLCdBP in interstitial cells may be responsible
for preventing Cdtoxicity to Leydig cells38). We also found that immunostaining was more positive for MT-III
than for MT-I,-II in testicular parenchyma. MT-III may have been present originally in
testicular tissue and may be involved in reducing the toxicity of harmful elements such as
Cd. However, the lack of change in expression of MT-I, MT-II, and Mt-III in our study
suggests that MT may not be involved in Cdtoxicity alleviation to the same extent as
MTLCdBP. We found that MTLCdBP concentration measured by the Cd-Hem method increased with
increasing testicular Cd concentration, and the degree of positive immunostaining with
MTLCdBP antibody also increased. The degree of positive staining was in descending order of
MTLCdBP>MT-III>MT-I,-II (Figs. 5, 6, 7). This suggests that Cdtoxicity is alleviated by
MTLCdBP rather than by MT.There are different cells involved in spermatogenesis in the testis, and it is possible
that different proteins and hormones may be involved at each stage28). MT is thought to bind to Cd and reduce its toxicity.
However, despite the MT concentration in the testes being higher than that in the liver or
the kidney, its induced synthesis is low in the testes in normal physiological state,
suggesting that it does not play a significant role in alleviating Cd toxicity11, 28).In conclusion, in the present study, a comparison of immunostaining in testicular tissue by
MTLCdBP polyclonal antibody and MT-I,-II and MT-III antibodies showed that intra-tissue
distribution and staining of these proteins in testicular tissues were significantly
different, and the tissue distribution of MT proteins (-I, -II, and -III) was also
different. Increased gene expression and induced synthesis of MT were not observed in the
testis (Figs. 1, 2, 3). In contrast, MTLCdBP, with an amino acid composition different from that of
MT, was inducibly synthesized consistent with the increase in Cd concentration, suggesting
that MTLCdBP has an important role in the protective mechanism against Cdtoxicity in the
testis (Figs. 5, 6, 7, 8).Future studies of MTLCdBP protein, particularly using microarray and MALDI-TOF-MS analysis,
should investigate in detail its role in the testes where cells of different reproductive
developmental stages exist. In addition, our study found that the concentrations of Cu in
the testes decreased with increasing accumulation of Cd (Table 1). Testicular toxicity of Cd may be reduced by its
interaction with other metals such as Zn, Se, Cu, etc.6,7,8,
10, 42,
43). Therefore, in order to elucidate the mechanism of Cdtoxicity in the
testes in detail, it is necessary to investigate interactions related to testis uptake of
Cd, Zn, and Cu, with specific consideration of metal transporters such as Zn44,45,46,47,48), as well as searching for and identifying
other candidate proteins involved in Cd detoxification.