Literature DB >> 30606664

A systematic review of infected descending thoracic aortic grafts and endografts.

Andrea Kahlberg1, Alessandro Grandi2, Diletta Loschi2, Frank Vermassen3, Nathalie Moreels3, Nabil Chakfé4, Germano Melissano2, Roberto Chiesa2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to collect and critically analyze the current evidence on the modalities and results of treatment of descending thoracic aortic surgical graft (SG) and endograft (EG) infection, which represents a rare but dramatic complication after both surgical and endovascular aortic repair.
METHODS: A comprehensive electronic health database search (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library) identified all articles that were published up to October 2017 reporting on thoracic aortic SG or EG infection. Observational studies, multicenter reports, single-center series and case reports, case-control studies, and guidelines were considered eligible if reporting specific results of treatment of descending thoracic aortic SG or EG infection. Comparisons of patients presenting with SG or EG infection and between invasive and conservative treatment were performed. Odds ratio (OR) meta-analyses were run when comparative data were available.
RESULTS: Forty-three studies reporting on 233 patients with infected SG (49) or EG (184) were included. Four were multicenter studies including 107 patients, all with EG infection, associated with a fistula in 91% of cases, with a reported overall survival at 2 years of 16% to 39%. The remaining 39 single-center studies included 49 patients with SG infection and 77 with EG infection. Association with aortoesophageal fistula was significantly more common with EG (60% vs 31%; P = .01). In addition, time interval from index procedure to infection was significantly shorter with EG (17 ± 21 months vs 32 ± 61 months; P = .03). Meta-analysis showed a trend of increased 1-year mortality in patients with SG infection compared with EG infection (pooled OR, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-14.7; P = .073). Surgical management with infected graft explantation was associated with a trend toward lower 1-year mortality compared with graft preservation (pooled OR, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-1.0; P = .056).
CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic aortic EG infection is likely to occur more frequently in association with aortoesophageal fistulas and in a shorter time compared with SG infection. Survival is poor in both groups, especially in patients with SG infection. Surgical treatment with graft explantation seems to be the preferable choice in fit patients.
Copyright © 2018 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood vessel prosthesis; Endovascular procedures; Esophageal fistula; Fistula; Infection; Respiratory fistula; Surgery; Thoracic aorta

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30606664     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  3 in total

1.  A rare case of an infected aortoiliac graft complicated with Eggerthella lenta bacteremia and septic shock.

Authors:  Harith A Alataby; Lloyd G Muzangwa; Muhamed K Atere; Joseph Bibawy; Keith T Diaz; Jay M Nfonoyim
Journal:  J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect       Date:  2020-09-03

2.  Efficacy of antiseptic impregnation of aortic endografts with rifampicin compared to silver against in vitro contamination with four bacteria that frequently cause vascular graft infections.

Authors:  Susanne Honig; Philipp Seeger; Holger Rohde; Tilo Kölbel; Eike Sebastian Debus; Holger Diener
Journal:  JVS Vasc Sci       Date:  2020-08-11

3.  Percutaneous Drainage for Aortic Graft Infection Post-aneurysm Repair: A Viable Option?

Authors:  Sean A Kennedy; M Katharine Kennedy; Thomas F Lindsay; John Byrne; Arash Jaberi; Wayne L Gold; KongTeng Tan; Sebastian Mafeld
Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 1.089

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.