Literature DB >> 3060613

Analysis of the 1982 ARA lupus criteria data set by recursive partitioning methodology: new insights into the relative merit of individual criteria.

S M Edworthy1, E Zatarain, D J McShane, D A Bloch.   

Abstract

The 339 cases of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and controls used in 1982 to develop the current ARA rules for classifying this disease were further analyzed using recursive partitioning methodology. The method identified 9 subgroups of cases and controls. It allowed correct classification of 97% of cases and 95% of controls while using only 6 criteria instead of 11. Antibodies to DNA were found to be the overall best discriminator. The largest subgroup (116 cases/4 controls) was made up of patients with both anti-DNA and fluorescent antinuclear antibody (FANA). Presence of malar rash was helpful in distinguishing SLE cases among patients who were anti-DNA negative. Low and high FANA values, in combination with other variables, helped to identify 3 SLE subgroups. Unlike the 1982 criteria, which did not include serum complement, the classification tree also identified subgroups of patients in which complement was either the best or the 2nd best discriminator. Recursive partitioning methodology thus gives important insights into how the criteria interact and the relative importance of specific variables for classification purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3060613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  6 in total

1.  Can our understanding of informed consent be strengthened using the idea of cluster concepts?

Authors:  Wayne Xavier Shandera
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2013-11

2.  Connective tissue diseases: classification criteria for SLE: the latest-but not least-attempt.

Authors:  Ricard Cervera; Gerard Espinosa
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 20.543

3.  Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Michelle Petri; Ana-Maria Orbai; Graciela S Alarcón; Caroline Gordon; Joan T Merrill; Paul R Fortin; Ian N Bruce; David Isenberg; Daniel J Wallace; Ola Nived; Gunnar Sturfelt; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman; Sang-Cheol Bae; John G Hanly; Jorge Sánchez-Guerrero; Ann Clarke; Cynthia Aranow; Susan Manzi; Murray Urowitz; Dafna Gladman; Kenneth Kalunian; Melissa Costner; Victoria P Werth; Asad Zoma; Sasha Bernatsky; Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza; Munther A Khamashta; Soren Jacobsen; Jill P Buyon; Peter Maddison; Mary Anne Dooley; Ronald F van Vollenhoven; Ellen Ginzler; Thomas Stoll; Christine Peschken; Joseph L Jorizzo; Jeffrey P Callen; S Sam Lim; Barri J Fessler; Murat Inanc; Diane L Kamen; Anisur Rahman; Kristjan Steinsson; Andrew G Franks; Lisa Sigler; Suhail Hameed; Hong Fang; Ngoc Pham; Robin Brey; Michael H Weisman; Gerald McGwin; Laurence S Magder
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-08

Review 4.  Features of autoantigens.

Authors:  W H Reeves; M Satoh
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Validation of the new classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus on a patient cohort from a national referral center: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Marija Bakula; Nada Čikeš; Branimir Anić
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 6.  Anti-dsDNA Antibodies are one of the many autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Shu Man Fu; Chao Dai; Zhenhuan Zhao; Felicia Gaskin
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2015-10-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.