Literature DB >> 30605769

Disabled insecticidal proteins: A novel tool to understand differences in insect receptor utilization.

Agoston Jerga1, Artem G Evdokimov2, Farhad Moshiri2, Jeffrey A Haas2, Mao Chen2, William Clinton2, Xiaoran Fu2, Coralie Halls2, Nuria Jimenez-Juarez2, Crystal N Kretzler2, Timothy D Panosian2, Michael Pleau2, James K Roberts2, Timothy J Rydel2, Sara Salvador2, Reuben Sequeira2, Yanfei Wang2, Meiying Zheng2, James A Baum2.   

Abstract

The development of insect resistance to pesticides via natural selection is an acknowledged agricultural issue. Likewise, resistance development in target insect populations is a significant challenge to the durability of crop traits conferring insect protection and has driven the need for novel insecticidal proteins (IPs) with alternative mechanism of action (MOA) mediated by different insect receptors. The combination or "stacking" of transgenes encoding different insecticidal proteins in a single crop plant can greatly delay the development of insect resistance, but requires sufficient knowledge of MOA to identify proteins with different receptor preferences. Accordingly, a rapid technique for differentiating the receptor binding preferences of insecticidal proteins is a critical need. This article introduces the Disabled Insecticidal Protein (DIP) method as applied to the well-known family of three-domain insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis and related bacteria. These DIP's contain amino acid substitutions in domain 1 that render the proteins non-toxic but still capable of competing with active proteins in insect feeding assays, resulting in a suppression of the expected insecticidal activity. A set of insecticidal proteins with known differences in receptor binding (Cry1Ab3, Cry1Ac.107, Cry2Ab2, Cry1Ca, Cry1A.105, and Cry1A.1088) has been studied using the DIP method, yielding results that are consistent with previous MOA studies. When a native IP and an excess of DIP are co-administered to insects in a feeding assay, the outcome depends on the overlap between their MOAs: if receptors are shared, then the DIP saturates the receptors to which the native protein would ordinarily bind, and acts as an antidote whereas, if there is no shared receptor, the toxicity of the native insecticidal protein is not inhibited. These results suggest that the DIP methodology, employing standard insect feeding assays, is a robust and effective method for rapid MOA differentiation among insecticidal proteins.
Copyright © 2019 Bayer Crop Science. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacillus thuringiensis; Insect resistance; Insecticidal protein; Mechanism of action

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30605769     DOI: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2018.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol        ISSN: 0965-1748            Impact factor:   4.714


  6 in total

1.  Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Da_7 and Cry1B.868 Protein Interactions with Novel Receptors Allow Control of Resistant Fall Armyworms, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith).

Authors:  Yanfei Wang; Jinling Wang; Xiaoran Fu; Jeffrey R Nageotte; Jennifer Silverman; Eric C Bretsnyder; Danqi Chen; Timothy J Rydel; Gregory J Bean; Ke Sherry Li; Edward Kraft; Anilkumar Gowda; Autumn Nance; Robert G Moore; Michael J Pleau; Jason S Milligan; Heather M Anderson; Peter Asiimwe; Adam Evans; William J Moar; Samuel Martinelli; Graham P Head; Jeffrey A Haas; James A Baum; Fei Yang; David L Kerns; Agoston Jerga
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Structural and functional insights into the first Bacillus thuringiensis vegetative insecticidal protein of the Vpb4 fold, active against western corn rootworm.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Kouadio; Meiying Zheng; Michael Aikins; David Duda; Stephen Duff; Danqi Chen; Jun Zhang; Jason Milligan; Christina Taylor; Patricia Mamanella; Timothy Rydel; Colton Kessenich; Timothy Panosian; Yong Yin; William Moar; Kara Giddings; Yoonseong Park; Agoston Jerga; Jeffrey Haas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Activation of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1I to a 50 kDa stable core impairs its full toxicity to Ostrinia nubilalis.

Authors:  Ayda Khorramnejad; Yolanda Bel; Reza Talaei-Hassanloui; Baltasar Escriche
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Recombinant Expression of ABCC2 Variants Confirms the Importance of Mutations in Extracellular Loop 4 for Cry1F Resistance in Fall Armyworm.

Authors:  Laura Franz; Klaus Raming; Ralf Nauen
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 4.546

5.  In vivo competition assays between Vip3 proteins confirm the occurrence of shared binding sites in Spodoptera littoralis.

Authors:  María Lázaro-Berenguer; Yudong Quan; Patricia Hernández-Martínez; Juan Ferré
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Bacillus thuringiensis chimeric proteins Cry1A.2 and Cry1B.2 to control soybean lepidopteran pests: New domain combinations enhance insecticidal spectrum of activity and novel receptor contributions.

Authors:  Danqi Chen; William J Moar; Agoston Jerga; Anilkumar Gowda; Jason S Milligan; Eric C Bretsynder; Timothy J Rydel; James A Baum; Altair Semeao; Xiaoran Fu; Victor Guzov; Karen Gabbert; Graham P Head; Jeffrey A Haas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.