Jian Liu1, Xianqing Li2, Lei Fan3, Jie Yang1, Jiecong Wang1, Jiaming Sun4, Zhenxing Wang5. 1. Department of Plastic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China. 2. Department of Cardiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China. 3. Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China. 4. Department of Plastic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China. Electronic address: sunjm1592@sina.com. 5. Department of Plastic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China. Electronic address: benjamin.wzx@163.com.
Abstract
AIMS: Large observational studies have yielded conflicting results regarding whether the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) increases the risk of bone diseases. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to examine the link between PPI and risk of bone fractures, osteoporosis and bone mineral density (BMD) loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically performed a search for published reports on PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. We considered articles published in English, and restricted the search to studies on human participants. Studies that reported adjusted Hazard ratio (HR) estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations of interest were included. Data from the articles which can be used to estimate standardized mean difference (SMD) were also obtained and utilized to assess the risk of BMD loss. KEY FINDINGS: Compared with patients not taking PPI, those taking PPI, had the increased risk of developing any-site fractures (HR: 1.30; 95%CI: 1.16 to 1.45), hip fracture (HR:1.22; 95%CI:1.15 to 1.31), spine fracture (HR:1.49; 95%CI:1.31 to 1.68), and osteoporosis (HR:1.23; 95%CI:1.06 to 1.42) based on a random model, but there was no correlation with developing BMD loss in the femoral (SMD: -0.27; 95%CI: -0.62 to 0.09), or in the spine (SMD: -0.06; 95%CI: -0.54 to 0.41). SIGNIFICANCE: Results of this meta-analysis suggest that PPI may moderately increase the risk of any-site, hip, spine fracture. Due to the widespread use of PPI and the impact of fractures on human health, clinicians should carefully evaluate the patient condition before prescribing PPI therapy.
AIMS: Large observational studies have yielded conflicting results regarding whether the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) increases the risk of bone diseases. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to examine the link between PPI and risk of bone fractures, osteoporosis and bone mineral density (BMD) loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically performed a search for published reports on PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. We considered articles published in English, and restricted the search to studies on humanparticipants. Studies that reported adjusted Hazard ratio (HR) estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations of interest were included. Data from the articles which can be used to estimate standardized mean difference (SMD) were also obtained and utilized to assess the risk of BMD loss. KEY FINDINGS: Compared with patients not taking PPI, those taking PPI, had the increased risk of developing any-site fractures (HR: 1.30; 95%CI: 1.16 to 1.45), hip fracture (HR:1.22; 95%CI:1.15 to 1.31), spine fracture (HR:1.49; 95%CI:1.31 to 1.68), and osteoporosis (HR:1.23; 95%CI:1.06 to 1.42) based on a random model, but there was no correlation with developing BMD loss in the femoral (SMD: -0.27; 95%CI: -0.62 to 0.09), or in the spine (SMD: -0.06; 95%CI: -0.54 to 0.41). SIGNIFICANCE: Results of this meta-analysis suggest that PPI may moderately increase the risk of any-site, hip, spine fracture. Due to the widespread use of PPI and the impact of fractures on human health, clinicians should carefully evaluate the patient condition before prescribing PPI therapy.
Authors: Philip O Katz; Kerry B Dunbar; Felice H Schnoll-Sussman; Katarina B Greer; Rena Yadlapati; Stuart Jon Spechler Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Barbara Altieri; Carla Di Dato; Roberta Modica; Filomena Bottiglieri; Antonella Di Sarno; James F H Pittaway; Chiara Martini; Antongiulio Faggiano; Annamaria Colao Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-04-08 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Aly A M Shaalan; Mohamed El-Sherbiny; Taghrid B El-Abaseri; Mohamed Z Shoaeir; Tarek M Abdel-Aziz; Magda I Mohamed; Sawsan A Zaitone; Hala M F Mohammad Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: Yun-Han Wang; Viktor Wintzell; Jonas F Ludvigsson; Henrik Svanström; Björn Pasternak Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Kok-Yong Chin; Benjamin Ka Seng Thong; Rhivaldy Faahim Kamalulloh; Nur Vaizura Mohamad; Sok Kuan Wong; Azlan Mohd Arlamsyah; Rahma Triliana; Ima Nirwana Soelaiman Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 4.162