Yue Qiao1, Yuan Ping, Hongbo Zhang2, Bo Zhou, Fengyong Liu3, Yinhui Yu1,4, Tingting Xie, Wanli Li, Danni Zhong, Yuezhou Zhang2, Ke Yao1,4, Hélder A Santos, Min Zhou1. 1. Eye Center & Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital , Zhejiang University School of Medicine , Hangzhou 310009 , China. 2. Department of Pharmaceutical Science Laboratory , Åbo Akademi University , Turku 20520 , Finland. 3. Department of Interventional Radiology , Chinese PLA General Hospital , Beijing 100853 , China. 4. Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology , Hangzhou 310009 , China.
Abstract
Chronic nonhealing wounds have imposed serious challenges in the clinical practice, especially for the patients infected with multidrug-resistant microbes. Herein, we developed an ultrasmall copper sulfide (covellite) nanodots (CuS NDs) based dual functional nanosystem to cure multidrug-resistant bacteria-infected chronic nonhealing wound. The nanosystem could eradicate multidrug-resistant bacteria and expedite wound healing simultaneously owing to the photothermal effect and remote control of copper-ion release. The antibacterial results indicated that the combination treatment of photothermal CuS NDs with photothermal effect initiated a strong antibacterial effect for drug-resistant pathogens including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and extended-spectrum β-lactamase Escherichia coli both in vitro and in vivo. Meanwhile, the released Cu2+ could promote fibroblast cell migration and endothelial cell angiogenesis, thus accelerating wound-healing effects. In MRSA-infected diabetic mice model, the nanosystem exhibited synergistic wound healing effect of infectious wounds in vivo and demonstrated negligible toxicity and nonspecific damage to major organs. The combination of ultrasmall CuS NDs with photothermal therapy displayed enhanced therapeutic efficacy for chronic nonhealing wound in multidrug-resistant bacterial infections, which may represent a promising class of antibacterial strategy for clinical translation.
Chronic nonhealing wounds have imposed serious challenges in the clinical practice, especially for the patients infected with multidrug-resistant microbes. Herein, we developed an ultrasmall copper sulfide (covellite) nanodots (CuS NDs) based dual functional nanosystem to cure multidrug-resistant bacteria-infected chronic nonhealing wound. The nanosystem could eradicate multidrug-resistant bacteria and expedite wound healing simultaneously owing to the photothermal effect and remote control of copper-ion release. The antibacterial results indicated that the combination treatment of photothermal CuS NDs with photothermal effect initiated a strong antibacterial effect for drug-resistant pathogens including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and extended-spectrum β-lactamase Escherichia coli both in vitro and in vivo. Meanwhile, the released Cu2+ could promote fibroblast cell migration and endothelial cell angiogenesis, thus accelerating wound-healing effects. In MRSA-infected diabeticmice model, the nanosystem exhibited synergistic wound healing effect of infectious wounds in vivo and demonstrated negligible toxicity and nonspecific damage to major organs. The combination of ultrasmall CuS NDs with photothermal therapy displayed enhanced therapeutic efficacy for chronic nonhealing wound in multidrug-resistant bacterial infections, which may represent a promising class of antibacterial strategy for clinical translation.
One of the complications
associated with patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus is chronic
wound infection.[1,2] Due to the nonhealing nature of
chronic diabetes wounds, their bacterial infection is becoming a major
challenge for both treatments and management in the clinical practice.[3−5] For example, diabeticpatients with foot ulcers often suffer from
bacterial infection, thereby increasing the risk of morbidity and
mortality.[6] Antibiotic therapies for chronic
diabetic wounds are often futile, largely due to the formation of
the extracellular polymeric substances (biofilms).[7,8] These
biofilms are generated during the growth of bacteria, which may prevent
antibiotics from penetrating into wound beds. Up to now, there are
limited reports of effective therapeutic approaches for alleviating
the symptom of chronic wound infection, or accelerating the wound-healing
process. Thus, development of alternative therapeutic modalities is
essential to address the current challenges.Copper ions are
essential catalysts of many enzymes, proteins, and transcription factors,
including vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF), nerve growth
factors, matrix metalloproteinases, glycyl-l-histidyl-l-lysine tripeptide, etc., to properly maintain the function.[9] They play an important role in many wound-healing
processes and serve as antiseptic and antimicrobial agents. Copper
ions are also reported to possess hypoxia-mimicking capacities, which
facilitate the stabilization of hypoxia-induced factors (HIFs) to
promote upregulation of the downstream-targeted genes, including VEGF,
thereby enhancing angiogenesis.[10−12] In addition, as one of the most
important trace elements for human beings, copper ions can enhance
bone density by inhibiting active bone resorption. As a result, delivery
of copper ions to the wound lesion is likely to improve antibacterial
effects and promote wound healing.[13−17]Recent studies indicated that nanomaterials
with photothermal capabilities may serve as a new class of therapeutic
agents for antibacterial therapy.[18−25] By virtue of their photothermal property, these materials converted
heat energy from absorbed light energy to provide a robust approach
to ablate infected bacteria. For example, the delivery of CuS nanoparticles
(NPs) to the tumor tissue would allow for the photothermal therapy
(PTT) through hyperthermia effect when the tumor was exposed to irradiation
of near-infrared (NIR) laser.[26−32] Recent studies also indicated that CuS-based photothermal therapy
(PTT) is a promising antiseptic strategy to combat antibacterial infection.[33−36] One intriguing feature is that the photothermal effect of CuS provides
a robust and reversible strategy to directly ablate bacteria simply
through the remote control of light irradiation, which minimizes the
potential issues of antibiotic misuse. This inspires us to repurpose
CuS-based NPs as the antibacterial agents for combating chronic wound
infections.In this study, we developed albumin-stabilized CuS
nanoparticles as a powerful antibacterial agent to simultaneously
exert antibacterial effect and accelerate wound-healing process. Specifically,
the photothermal ability of CuS is exploited for ablating bacteria;
the released Cu2+ is not only capable of promoting wound
healing but also enhancing antibacterial effect. We demonstrated that
such an antibacterial formulation is capable of eradicating multidrug-resistant
(MDR) bacterial infection without damaging surrounding dermal tissues,
and more importantly, accelerating wound-healing process of MDR bacteria-infecteddiabeticmice.
Materials
and Methods
Bacteria
Extended-spectrum β-lactamase Escherichia coli (ESBL, ATCC 35218), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, ATCC 43300), human foreskin
fibroblast cell (HFF-1, ATCC SCRC-1041), and human umbilical vein
endothelial cell (HUVEC, ATCC CRL-1730) were obtained from American
Type Culture Collection (ATCC). BALB/c mice were obtained from Shanghai
Bioscience Co., Ltd and diabetic mutant (db/db) mice were obtained
from Changzhou Cavens Co., Ltd.
In Vitro
Antibacterial Activity Analysis
Drug-resistant Gram-negative
bacterial ESBL E. coli and MRSA were
employed for the estimation of the synergistic antibacterial effects
of CuS nanodots (NDs) plus NIR laser irradiation. Following activation
and incubation, logarithmic growth phase bacterial was diluted 200-fold
with fresh lysogeny broth (LB) medium and supplemented with different
concentration series (2.81, 5.63, 11.25, 22.5, and 45.0 μg/mL)
of CuS NDs and then illuminated with laser (808 nm, 2.5 W/cm2) for 10 min. After shaking at 37 °C for 24 h, 100 μL
bacterial suspension from each group was transferred into a sterile
96-well culture plate. Measurement of 600 nm wavelength optical absorbance
(OD600) by a microplate reader (SpectraMax M5) was taken,
which indicated bacterial concentration for making a further calculation
of survival rate. The bacterial suspensions were diluted 106-fold and then 100 μL of the bacterial dilutions was coated
and incubated on LB agar plates with a spreader for overnight at 37
°C. Assessment of colony-forming unit (CFU) quantization was
implemented by arithmetic on the basis of CFUs emergence. CuS NDs
without laser and CuS NPs with/without laser were designed for control
groups.
In Vivo Antibacterial Activity Analysis
All the experiments on animals were accredited by the institutional
ethics committee and agreed with the requirements for the care and
use of laboratory animals of Zhejiang University. Six-week-aged female
BALB/c mice were obtained from Shanghai Slac Laboratory Animal Co.,
Ltd. The bacterial strain of MRSA was used for mouseinfection in
vivo model. Briefly, 4 groups of mice (n = 5/group)
were anesthetized using 4% chloral hydrate (30 mg/kg) and then one
wound hole was prepared on the backbone of the mouse with ophthalmic
surgical scissors over a surface circle with a diameter of 0.7 cm.
Afterward, 50 μL of MRSA suspension (2.0 × 107 CFU/mL) was used to infect the tissue of all the mice to establish
an experimental model of infection. Twenty-four hours later, for the
CuS NDs Laser group, CuS NDs (45 μg/mL, 50 μL) was smeared
on the wounds, which were irradiated with an 808 nm laser (2.5 W/cm2, 1 min), and the temperature changes of wounds were observed
by thermographic pictures captured using infrared thermal imaging
system. In the period of 12 days after the administration, the mice
were monitored and wounds that were visually observed for recovery
were measured by vernier caliper every 2 days. The CuS NDs, CuS NPs
plus laser, and blank control groups were also carried out in the
same procedure. Subsequently, the treated and control mice were euthanized
under anesthesia by cervical dislocation and the infected tissue was
excised to prepare pathological slides. For histological analysis,
the tissue samples were soaked in 10% formalin solution, desiccated,
paraffin embedded, and sectioned into 5 μm slices, which were
then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). High-resolution
images of all the histological slices were taken via virtual slide
microscopy (Olympus VS120, Japan).
In Vitro
Cell Migration
The HFF-1 cells were seeded in 24-well plates
(104 cells per well) and allowed to form a confluent monolayer.
After starvation with fetal bovine serum (FBS)-free medium for 24
h, the cell monolayer was scratched in a straight-line using a 200
μL pipette tip to mimic an incisional wound. Cells were then
washed with phosphate-buffered saline to remove debris, treated with
CuS NDs (45 μg/mL) upon laser irradiation (808 nm, 2.5 W/cm2, 10 min), and incubated at 37 °C with the medium containing
1% FBS. Twenty-four hours later, the cells were photographed and cell
migration rate was calculated. CuS NDs without laser irradiation,
CuS NPs with laser irradiation and untreated group were designed as
control.
In Vitro Cell Angiogenesis
The HUVECs
(104 cells/well) were incubated in the treatment of CuS
NDs (45 μg/mL) upon laser irradiation (808 nm, 2.5 W/cm2, 10 min) with 1% FBS on Matrigel for 24 h at 37 °C.
At each time point, the cells were photographed from three random
fields on an inversion microscope. CuS NDs without laser irradiation,
CuS NPs with laser irradiation, and untreated group were designed
as control. The enclosed networks of complete tubes were digitally
imaged and quantified using the Angiogenesis Analyzer plugin on ImageJ.
In Vivo Wound Healing Improvement Analysis
Diabetic mutant (db/db) mice (6 weeks aged, female) were operated
to form MRSA infection wound model and treated with different therapies.
The protocol was identical with that of in vivo antibacterial activity analysis excluding wounds
area measurement interval time was 3 days and tissue slices were stained
with Masson’s trichrome (MT) staining after tissue fixation.
Collagen tissue gap and thickness were quantized.
Results and Discussion
Preparation and Characterization
of CuS NDs
CuS NDs were synthesized by a facile single-step
hydrothermal route. Bovineserum albumin (BSA), a biocompatible and
highly soluble protein, was used to control the particle size and
stability during the preparation. A representative transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) image (Figure a) demonstrated that the CuS NDs size was ca. 6 nm. The hydrodynamic
diameter of CuS NDs (Figure b) was measured by dynamic light scattering analysis, and
the average size (9 nm) was larger than those presented in TEM. The
ζ-potential analysis of CuS NDs indicated a nearly neutral surface
charge (−2.21 mV) (Figure c). Furthermore, the UV–NIR absorption spectrum
showed a strong absorption band in the NIR window with a peak at 994
nm (Figure d), which
may render the capability of CuS NDs for NIR-laser-induced photothermal
conversion. We next systematically investigated the photothermal conversion
efficiency of the CuS NDs. As shown in Figure e, the temperature of CuS NDs increased quickly
within 5 min up to 65 °C and then reached a plateau. The photothermal
conversion efficiency of CuS NDs was about 36.35% (Figure f), which was higher than that
of many other known photothermal coupling agents and suggested a minimum
injury to the surrounding normal tissues.
Figure 1
Characterization of CuS
NDs. (a) TEM image of CuS NDs (inset: high-resolution TEM image).
(b) Hydrodynamic diameter of CuS NDs measured by dynamic light scattering.
(c) ζ-Potential of CuS NDs showing the surface charge is almost
neutral. (d) UV–vis–NIR absorption spectrum of CuS NDs
showing a strong absorbance band in the near-infrared region. (e)
The temperature profiles of CuS NDs irradiated by NIR laser, followed
by cooling down by turning off the laser light. An 808 nm laser with
the power density of 1.5 W/cm2 was used. (f) Linear time
data versus −Ln(θ) from the cooling period of panel versus
negative natural logarithm of driving force temperature. (g) Temperature
increment versus irradiation power density over a period of exposure
to the 808 nm laser. The concentration of CuS NDs was 22.5 μg/mL.
(h) Temperature increment over a period of exposure to the 808 nm
laser (2.0 W/cm2) at various CuS NDs concentrations. (i)
The photothermal image array of CuS NDs photothermal performance versus
different power densities and concentrations. (j–l) Cumulative
amounts Cu2+ released from the CuS NDs or CuS NPs under
irradiation over a period of exposure to the 808 nm laser with different
laser power densities of (j) 1.0 W/cm2, (k) 2.0 W/cm2, and (l) 2.5 W/cm2.
Characterization of CuS
NDs. (a) TEM image of CuS NDs (inset: high-resolution TEM image).
(b) Hydrodynamic diameter of CuS NDs measured by dynamic light scattering.
(c) ζ-Potential of CuS NDs showing the surface charge is almost
neutral. (d) UV–vis–NIR absorption spectrum of CuS NDs
showing a strong absorbance band in the near-infrared region. (e)
The temperature profiles of CuS NDs irradiated by NIR laser, followed
by cooling down by turning off the laser light. An 808 nm laser with
the power density of 1.5 W/cm2 was used. (f) Linear time
data versus −Ln(θ) from the cooling period of panel versus
negative natural logarithm of driving force temperature. (g) Temperature
increment versus irradiation power density over a period of exposure
to the 808 nm laser. The concentration of CuS NDs was 22.5 μg/mL.
(h) Temperature increment over a period of exposure to the 808 nm
laser (2.0 W/cm2) at various CuS NDs concentrations. (i)
The photothermal image array of CuS NDs photothermal performance versus
different power densities and concentrations. (j–l) Cumulative
amounts Cu2+ released from the CuS NDs or CuS NPs under
irradiation over a period of exposure to the 808 nm laser with different
laser power densities of (j) 1.0 W/cm2, (k) 2.0 W/cm2, and (l) 2.5 W/cm2.The temperature elevation was well correlated with laser
power density and the concentration of nanoparticles (Figure g–i). It should be noted
that when the concentration of CuS NDs was 22.5 μg/mL, the temperature
of the solution was increased to ∼83.8 °C at 5 min with
2.5 W/cm2 laser treatment, whereas only 40.5 °C was
achieved under 0.5 W/cm2 laser exposure. The data confirm
that the excellent photothermal efficiency of CuS NDs could be achieved
and tuned by adjusting the laser energy as well as the concentration
of nanoparticles. PTT property of material was sometimes accompanied
by photodynamic therapy (PDT) property and their several studies demonstrating
CuS as a PDT agent.[29,37,38] To investigate the reactive oxygen species (ROS) level after the
irradiation, we quantify the ROS level by measuring the fluorescence
intensity from 2,7-dichlorofluorescein (DCF), which is converted by
nonfluorescent 2,7-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) after ROS
oxidization. As shown in Figure S1, fluorescence
was hardly detected without laser irradiation, whereas both CuS NDs
and CuS NPs group generate green fluorescence. CuS NDs showed stronger
ROS generation capabilities as compared with CuS NPs, indicating their
possible better antibacterial effect. Compared to the larger-sized
CuS NPs (∼20 nm), the ultrasmall CuS NDs (∼6 nm) have
a higher (∼36-folds) surface area and thus demonstrated a higher
ROS signal due to the corresponding higher photodynamic conversion
effects. The results demonstrate the comprehensive property of CuS
NDs to synergistically kill bacteria by ROS generation and energy
conversion.
Copper Ion (Cu2+) Release under Laser Irradiation
Inspired by the ultrasmall
size and the excellent NIR photothermal conversion effect of CuS NDs,
we hypothesized that the synergistic effect could provide hyperthermia
and stimulate Cu2+ release under the laser irradiation.
Therefore, the amount of released Cu2+ in designed time
points was analyzed from the solution of CuS NDs and CuS NPs undergo
NIR laser irradiation. In experimental condition, the CuS NDs resulted
in a distinctly high amount of Cu2+ release when the sample
was irradiated for longer than 2 min compared with CuS NPs (Figure j–l), demonstrating
the factor of ultrasmall size conductive to facilitate Cu2+ release from CuS particles in the laser irradiation condition. Cu2+ linearly released within the first 5 min and then gradually
became constant. Notely, more Cu2+ was released when the
sample was treated by higher laser power density, indicating their
controllable release capability via the adjustable laser power density.
In Vitro Antibacterial Activity to Drug-Resistant
Bacteria
The antibacterial activity of CuS NDs was investigated
using two drug-resistant bacterial strain models, namely, extended-spectrum
β-lactamase-positive E. coli (ESBL E. coli) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Turbidity, survival analysis, growth-inhibition
assay, and spread plate method were applied in the experiment (Figure ). In general, although
CuS NPs exhibited a very weak antibacterial capacity against both
strains, CuS NDs heavily inhibit the reproduction of both stains,
as reflected by its dose-dependent assay. This is due to the enhanced
water stability of CuS NDs, therefore, in favor of Cu2+ release compared to unstable CuS NPs in the suspension. When both
formulations were exposed to laser irradiation, they all exhibited
enhanced antibacterial effect, and CuS NDs could completely kill bacteria
up to 45 μg/mL (CuS NDs). The CuS NDs plus laser irradiation
treatment demonstrated much higher antibacterial effects than the
CuS NPs plus irradiation treatment in both strains. These results
were in accordance with the growth of bacteria (ESBL E. coli and MRSA) in Petri dishes after exposure
to different treatments.
Figure 2
Antibacterial effect of CuS NDs PTT in vitro.
Photographs and survival rates of ESBL E. coli (a, b) and MRSA E. coli (c, d) with
various treatments at different NPs concentrations. Power density
was 2.5 W/cm2 for 10 min. (e, g) Photographs of ESBL E. coli and MRSA bacterial colonies formed on LB
agar plates with various treatments at different concentrations. (f,
h) The corresponding CFU count of ESBL E. coli and MRSA with various treatments. The power density was 2.5 W/cm2 for 10 min (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
Antibacterial effect of CuS NDs PTT in vitro.
Photographs and survival rates of ESBL E. coli (a, b) and MRSA E. coli (c, d) with
various treatments at different NPs concentrations. Power density
was 2.5 W/cm2 for 10 min. (e, g) Photographs of ESBL E. coli and MRSA bacterial colonies formed on LB
agar plates with various treatments at different concentrations. (f,
h) The corresponding CFU count of ESBL E. coli and MRSA with various treatments. The power density was 2.5 W/cm2 for 10 min (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
Evaluation of the Integrity of Bacteria
To further investigate the antibacterial mechanisms, cellular morphological
changes of ESBL E. coli and MRSA following
the treatment were studied via scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
As demonstrated in Figure a, it was found that both bacteria without any treatment remained
fully active with typical clubbed/spherical shape and intact smooth
surface. In the case of ESBL E. coli treated with CuS NDs under NIR laser irradiation, their original
morphology was distorted and displayed wrinkled bacterial cellular
wall/membranes with clear lesions and hole. As to MRSA treated with
CuS NDs under NIR laser irradiation (Figure b), a large amount of ultrasmall nanodots
adhered to the bacterial surface were observed, which may be attributed
to the strong interaction between CuS NDs and bacterial cellular wall.
Using EDS element mapping technique, we also found amass of CuS NDs
on the bacterial surface (Figure S2) when
the bacteria was treated with CuS NDs plus laser.
Figure 3
Bacteria’s inner
structure disruption and potential mechanism of CuS NDs PTT antibacterial
effect. SEM images of (a) ESBL E. coli and (b) MRSA treated with different materials (45 μg/mL) upon
laser irradiation (2.5 W/cm2, 10 min). TEM images of (c)
ESBL E. coli and (d) MRSA treated with
different materials (45 μg/mL) upon laser irradiation (2.5 W/cm2, 10 min).
Bacteria’s inner
structure disruption and potential mechanism of CuS NDs PTT antibacterial
effect. SEM images of (a) ESBL E. coli and (b) MRSA treated with different materials (45 μg/mL) upon
laser irradiation (2.5 W/cm2, 10 min). TEM images of (c)
ESBL E. coli and (d) MRSA treated with
different materials (45 μg/mL) upon laser irradiation (2.5 W/cm2, 10 min).TEM analysis showed that
part of the outer membranes of the bacteria were damaged after CuS
NPs plus laser or CuS NDs treatments. However, almost all of the bacterial
membranes were lysed after CuS NDs plus laser treatments, leading
to the loss of structural integrity of bacterial cell walls (Figure c). Also, the cytoplasm
of the bacteria displayed aggregated obviously in both strains after CuS NDs plus
laser irradiation, indicating the damage of the cells. There are many
nanoparticles aggregation on the surface of the outer membrane after
CuS NDs or CuS NDs plus laser treatment (Figure d), thus determining an enhanced permeability
of the bacterial membrane, which allowed entry into the cell and,
possibly, caused its death.The bacteria survival rate was further
verified by a fluorescence staining assay on the basis of the integrity
of bacterial cellular wall/membrane.[25] As
shown in Figure a,
strongest red fluorescence could be observed in the group in which
the bacteria were treated with CuS NDs with laser irradiation, indicating
the strong antibacterial effect of CuS NDs after laser irradiation.
Taken together, these results provided confirmative evidence that
the strong interaction between CuS NDs and bacteria and photothermal
effects from CuS NDs may be the key reason to induce the lysis of
bacteria, which may influence intracellular metabolism to induce bacterial
cell apoptosis.
Figure 4
(a) Fluorescent and bright-field photographs of ESBL E. coli with different materials (45 μg/mL)
upon laser irradiation (2.5 W/cm2, 10 min), stained by
PI following various treatments, bar = 50 μm. (b) In vitro ROS
effects with various treatments. Fluorescent and bright-field photographs
of ESBL E. coli with different materials
(45 μg/mL) upon laser irradiation (2.5 W/cm2, 10
min), stained by DCFH-DA, bar = 50 μm.
(a) Fluorescent and bright-field photographs of ESBL E. coli with different materials (45 μg/mL)
upon laser irradiation (2.5 W/cm2, 10 min), stained by
PI following various treatments, bar = 50 μm. (b) In vitro ROS
effects with various treatments. Fluorescent and bright-field photographs
of ESBL E. coli with different materials
(45 μg/mL) upon laser irradiation (2.5 W/cm2, 10
min), stained by DCFH-DA, bar = 50 μm.
ROS Effect and Photodynamic Therapy
In addition to above results, we further wish to explore whether
the generation of ROS occurs upon irradiation. We thus used DCFH-DA
to monitor the generation of ROS after different treatments on ESBL E. coli. As shown in Figure b, the bacteria treated with CuS NPs/CuS
NDs with laser treatment present strong fluorescence signal, confirming
the ROS generation upon laser irradiation.Currently, the nanomaterial-mediated
antibacterial therapy is involved in different mechanistic aspects
to kill bacteria,[39−42] including disruption of bacterial cellular wall/membrane,[43] RNA effluxes,[44] DNA
damage,[45] oxidative stress to bacterial
cells,[46] and possible inhibition of the
bacterial energy metabolism,[47] as well
as photothermal antibacterial therapy (involving initiation of sonic
and mechanical wave, bubble generation, heat damage, and fusion or
disintegration of nanoparticles).[48−50] There are also other
results that suggest that the nanoparticles may adhere to the exterior
of the cell wall/membrane, interfering with permeability and negatively
influencing the cellular respiratory action and disturbing the metastasis
of cells. As for the present study, the treatment of CuS NDs was demonstrated
to induce destruction of bacterial cellular wall/membrane integrity
and cause variation of the structure. In collaboration with other
findings, we propose the antibacterial effect as result of (i) photothermal
effects of CuS NDs, (ii) release of Cu2+, and (iii) photodynamic
generation of ROS. CuS NDs-mediated phototherapy involves multiple
mechanisms of anticancer therapy, and we believe these combinational
effects jointly contribute to the efficient antibacterial therapy.
Promoting Healing Effects of CuS NDs PTT in Vitro
To verify the effect of Cu2+ in accelerating the dermal
tissue restoration, we chose human foreskin fibroblast cell (HFF-1)
for in vitro scratch assay. Following the different treatments of
cells scratch, the migration extent displayed a significant difference
(Figure a). After
the treatment with CuS NDs with laser irradiation, the cells exhibited
the strongest migration capability. Quantitative analysis results
are also in agreement with the migration observation, where the group
with CuS NDs with laser irradiation showed the highest migration rate
(Figure b). Furthermore,
we performed the Matrigel assay to simulate the angiogenesis of endothelial
cells on top of connective tissue membrane, and human umbilical vein
endothelial cells (HUVEC) were used for this assay. As shown in Figure c, the cells stretched
to form tight junctions, branch nodes, mesh circles, and parallel
cell lines, which are the typical indications of the late stage of
angiogenesis, after the treatment of CuS NDs with laser irradiation.[46] However, the cells only formed a few short lines
and meshes, which were regarded as the early stage of angiogenesis
after other treatments. The special HUVEC angiogenesis quantitative
analysis of tubule junctions, tubule nodes, and tubule meshes from
every group were also in agreement with our observation (Figures d and S3a,b).
Figure 5
Promoting healing effects of and potential mechanism
CuS NDs PTT in vitro/in vivo. (a) Digital images of Hiff-1 cells after
treatment with CuS NPs laser, CuS NDs, and CuS NDs laser for 24 h,
bar = 400 μm. (b) Quantification of HFF-1 cells migration. (c)
Micrographs and digital analysis conversion of endothelial tubulogenesis
of HUVECs based on the Matrigel in the presence of CuS NPs laser,
CuS NDs, and CuS NDs laser for 24 h, bar = 400 μm. (d) Quantification
of tubule junctions.
Promoting healing effects of and potential mechanism
CuS NDs PTT in vitro/in vivo. (a) Digital images of Hiff-1 cells after
treatment with CuS NPs laser, CuS NDs, and CuS NDs laser for 24 h,
bar = 400 μm. (b) Quantification of HFF-1 cells migration. (c)
Micrographs and digital analysis conversion of endothelial tubulogenesis
of HUVECs based on the Matrigel in the presence of CuS NPs laser,
CuS NDs, and CuS NDs laser for 24 h, bar = 400 μm. (d) Quantification
of tubule junctions.
Evaluation of in Vivo Antibacterial Effect
by BALB/c Wound-Infection Model
To assess the antibacterial
effects in vivo, female BALB/c mice with an infected wound on their
back were subjected to the indicated treatment. Before the treatment,
the ulceration appeared in all treatment groups and remained unhealed
even after 6 days (Figure ). The elevated temperature was observed in the wound area
upon laser irradiation of the mice treated with CuS NDs (Figure a,b); the highest
temperature recorded in the wound area was about 50 °C, which
did not lead to the obvious damage to normal tissue. Compared with
untreated and other control groups (Figure c), the trauma area treated CuS NDs with
laser irradiation became much smaller, whereas the treatment of either
CuS NDs without laser irradiation, or CuS NPs with laser irradiation,
only induced moderate reduction of the trauma area (Figure d). As indicated by H&E
staining results (Figure e), the histological slice of untreated control groups displayed
the obvious infiltration of inflammatory cells, which are composed
of neutrophils and mononuclear cells adhered to the stratified squamous
epithelium. In contrast, the infiltration of inflammatory cells was
hardly observed in the mice that were administrated with CuS NDs with
laser irradiation. Among all groups, the infiltration degree of inflammatory
cells from either CuS NDs, or the CuS NPs laser group, is moderate,
suggesting their weak antibacterial effects. These results demonstrated
the effectiveness of irradiation-mediated photothermal treatment to
reduce the burden of bacterial infection in vivo.
Figure 6
Antibacterial effect
of CuS NDs PTT in vivo. (a) Thermal infrared image of temperature
evolution on dosed mice upon NIR laser irradiation (45 μg/mL,
2.5 W/cm2). (b) Temperature evolution profile of dosed
mice upon NIR laser irradiation. (c) Wound photographs for different
treatment effects of BALB/c mice MRSA-infected wound. (d) Wound area
evolution rate of BALB/c mice. (e) Pathologic histological analysis
of CuS NDs PTT antibacterial effect. H&E staining of the BALB/c
mice dermal wound tissue at day 8 after treatment, up bar = 50 μm,
bottom bar = 100 μm.
Antibacterial effect
of CuS NDs PTT in vivo. (a) Thermal infrared image of temperature
evolution on dosed mice upon NIR laser irradiation (45 μg/mL,
2.5 W/cm2). (b) Temperature evolution profile of dosed
mice upon NIR laser irradiation. (c) Wound photographs for different
treatment effects of BALB/c miceMRSA-infected wound. (d) Wound area
evolution rate of BALB/c mice. (e) Pathologic histological analysis
of CuS NDs PTT antibacterial effect. H&E staining of the BALB/c
mice dermal wound tissue at day 8 after treatment, up bar = 50 μm,
bottom bar = 100 μm.
Promoting Healing Effects and Potential Mechanism
of CuS NDs PTT in Vivo
As typical chronic nonhealing wounds,
chronic diabetes wounds remain a major challenge for treatment in
clinic. The bacteria-infected dermal wound model in diabeticmice
was used to evaluate the antibacterial effects and wound-healing effects
of our samples owing to its validated, reproducible, and readily available
characteristics.[51,52] We further evaluated whether
the treatment modality we have developed could promote tissue restoration.
To this end, diabetic mutant (db/db) mice with MRSA-infected wounds
were established as the drug-resistant infected chronic nonhealing
wound model for in vivo study. The wounds of mice treated with CuS
NDs with laser irradiation almost disappeared completely at day 12,
whereas other indicated treatments induced incomplete recovery (Figure a,b).
Figure 7
Pathologic histological
analysis of CuS NDs PTT promoting healing effect in MRSA-infected
diabetic wound model. (a) Digital images of Masson’s trichrome-stained
(db/db) mice dermal wound tissue at day 12 after wounding and collagen
distribution (aquamarine blue) in healed skin as per tissue sections,
bar = 1 mm. (b) Quantification of the percentage of wound healing
area over time. (c) Vertical section of the wound stained between
the euangiotic tissues at both ends and the collagen tissue gap (stained
with aquamarine blue) after different treatments. (d) Quantification
of the collagen tissue thickness. (e) Quantification of the collagen
tissue gap.
Pathologic histological
analysis of CuS NDs PTT promoting healing effect in MRSA-infecteddiabetic wound model. (a) Digital images of Masson’s trichrome-stained
(db/db) mice dermal wound tissue at day 12 after wounding and collagen
distribution (aquamarine blue) in healed skin as per tissue sections,
bar = 1 mm. (b) Quantification of the percentage of wound healing
area over time. (c) Vertical section of the wound stained between
the euangiotic tissues at both ends and the collagen tissue gap (stained
with aquamarine blue) after different treatments. (d) Quantification
of the collagen tissue thickness. (e) Quantification of the collagen
tissue gap.We further performed
the Masson’s trichrome (MT) staining to analyze the histological
characteristics of in vivo promoting healing effects in terms of collagen
gap and thickness. The vertical section was stained between the euangiotic
tissues at both ends, and the collagen tissue gap (stained with aquamarine
blue) after different treatments was observed (Figure c). The shortest gap was observed with CuS
NDs treatment with laser irradiation, whereas the largest gap and
thickest euangiotic tissue were observed in the control group (Figure d,e).Local
wound hypoxia plays an important role in determining the success of
the healing process.[9−12] As the main regulator of oxygen homeostasis, hypoxia-inducible factor-1
(HIF-1) is an important determinant of healing effect. The presence
of HIF-1α was almost negligible in control and CuS NPs laser
groups, indicating their low expression (Figure a,b). The CuS NDs demonstrated a higher HIF-1α
expression. However, HIF-1α was upregulated in the wound bed
area in the CuS NDs laser groups owing to the obvious simulation of
HIF-1α protein concentration. VEGF, as a direct neovascularization
important factor for wound healing, was also upregulated in the wound
area (Figure a,c).
A significant improvement in the total number of vessels was investigated
by staining with an anti-CD31 antibody in the CuS NDs laser groups
compared with the other groups (Figure a,d). The possible mechanism of the CuS NDs laser-mediated
wound healing is shown in Figure e. The release of copper ion could be controlled by CuS NDs under laser irradiation, and the released
Cu2+ may upregulate HIF-1α. High expression of HIF-1α
induced higher concentration of angiogenesis relative cells and formation
of more vessels in the core position of skin formation process, and
finally improved the local wound healing.
Figure 8
Immunohistochemical staining
(a) and quantitative analysis (b–d) of HIF-1α, VEGF,
and CD31 in the wound bed on day 12, scale bar = 100 μm. (e)
Scheme of possible mechanism.
Immunohistochemical staining
(a) and quantitative analysis (b–d) of HIF-1α, VEGF,
and CD31 in the wound bed on day 12, scale bar = 100 μm. (e)
Scheme of possible mechanism.
Pilot Toxicity Study
To evaluate
the potential toxicity of CuS NDs after the laser irradiation, in
vitro cytotoxicity experiments were operated with 2 human skin cell
lines, namely, HFF-1 cells and HUVECs. As shown in Figure a,b, cell viability was independent
of dose of the CuS NDs with laser irradiation, and both cell lines
were still viable even at the concentration of 45 μg/mL, indicating
the low cytotoxic nature of CuS NDs and photocytotoxicity. The toxicity
to major organs was further investigated by H&E staining (Figure c). H&E indicated
that CuS NDs with laser irradiation did not show any significant histological
changes or toxicity within the treatment period, and there was no
death or significant weight loss in in vivo experimental results,
suggesting its safety and good biocompatibility in vivo. Furthermore,
the body weight remained steady after the treatment (Figure S4a). In the meantime, the liver function index (such
as ALT and AST) and kidney function index through blood biochemistry
test (Figure S4b) remain almost unchanged
after the treatment of CuS NDs with laser irradiation. All these results
strongly demonstrate that our developed therapeutic strategy is safe
for in vivo application of antibacterial therapy and wound healing.
Figure 9
Preliminary
toxicity study. Cytotoxicity to (a) HFF-1 and (b) HUVEC with different
CuS NDs concentrations with laser irradiation (2.5 W/cm2, 10 min). (c) Histological toxicological observation of H&E
staining of tissues of major organs (heart, liver, spleen, lung, and
kidney; bar = 100 μm).
Preliminary
toxicity study. Cytotoxicity to (a) HFF-1 and (b) HUVEC with different
CuS NDs concentrations with laser irradiation (2.5 W/cm2, 10 min). (c) Histological toxicological observation of H&E
staining of tissues of major organs (heart, liver, spleen, lung, and
kidney; bar = 100 μm).
Conclusions
In summary, we developed
a new class of nanomedicine as an effective strategy for the treatment
of chronic nonhealing infectious wounds. This strategy relies on both
photothermal and photodynamic effects of CuS to eradicate bacteria
and the released Cu2+ to accelerate wound-healing process
by promoting the angiogenesis of endothelial cells in the wound area.
As a result, the formulation of CuS ND could effectively treat bacteria-infected
chronic nonhealing wounds under laser irradiation. We demonstrated
that such a therapeutic modality was effective in inhibiting drug-resistant
pathogens, including MRSA and ESBL E. coli both in vitro and in vivo, and in curing infectious wounds in vivo
with negligible local or systemic toxicities. Our strategy offers
an effective antibacterial therapeutic modality for the treatment
of chronic infectious wounds in the dawning era of precision medicine.
Authors: Z L Shaw; Sruthi Kuriakose; Samuel Cheeseman; Michael D Dickey; Jan Genzer; Andrew J Christofferson; Russell J Crawford; Chris F McConville; James Chapman; Vi Khanh Truong; Aaron Elbourne; Sumeet Walia Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 14.919