Literature DB >> 30604655

Motor tests for primary school aged children: A systematic review.

Claude Scheuer1, Christian Herrmann2, Andreas Bund1.   

Abstract

Motor testing in education has gained in relevance in light of recent developments in educational systems (Köller & Baumert, 2012). The purpose of this systematic review was to identify studies using motor tests in primary school children aged 4 to 12 years and to synthetize information about the quality and application of the test instruments used. A systematic review of 910 records identified by a search of nine databases yielded 144 papers reporting motor testing in primary school age children, including 25 articles reporting on the quality of 20 test instruments. In the selected articles, tests grounded on the constructs of "motor abilities" and/or "motor skills" are the most frequent and are mostly used for monitoring purposes or for impact research. Tests based on the construct "motor competencies" have become popular only recently, being relevant for educational motor testing due to their curricular validity. The test instruments have been investigated towards their validity and reliability to different extents. However, for several test instruments factorial validity has not been established and more validation studies are needed to improve their psychometric quality especially if used in educational contexts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motor assessment; educational monitoring; pedagogical diagnosis; physical education; primary school

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30604655     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1544535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  9 in total

Review 1.  Reinvest to Assess: Advancing Approaches to Motor Competence Measurement Across the Lifespan.

Authors:  Ryan M Hulteen; Bryan Terlizzi; T Cade Abrams; Ryan S Sacko; An De Meester; Caterina Pesce; David F Stodden
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 11.928

2.  Accuracy vs. Practicality of Inertial Measurement Unit Sensors to Evaluate Motor Competence in Children.

Authors:  Natalie Lander; Darius Nahavandi; Nicole G Toomey; Lisa M Barnett; Shady Mohamed
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  Basic Motor Competencies of 6- to 8-Year-Old Primary School Children in 10 European Countries: A Cross-Sectional Study on Associations With Age, Sex, Body Mass Index, and Physical Activity.

Authors:  Marina Wälti; Jeffrey Sallen; Manolis Adamakis; Fabienne Ennigkeit; Erin Gerlach; Christopher Heim; Boris Jidovtseff; Irene Kossyva; Jana Labudová; Dana Masaryková; Remo Mombarg; Liliane De Sousa Morgado; Benjamin Niederkofler; Maike Niehues; Marcos Onofre; Uwe Pühse; Ana Quitério; Claude Scheuer; Harald Seelig; Petr Vlček; Jaroslav Vrbas; Christian Herrmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-25

4.  Motor competence assessments for children with intellectual disabilities and/or autism: a systematic review.

Authors:  Samantha J Downs; Lynne M Boddy; Bronagh McGrane; James R Rudd; Craig A Melville; Lawrence Foweather
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2020-11-19

5.  Influence of the Psychomotor Profile in the Improvement of Learning in Early Childhood Education.

Authors:  Francisco José Borrego-Balsalobre; Alfonso Martínez-Moreno; Vicente Morales-Baños; Arturo Díaz-Suárez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Changes in Motor Competence after a Brief Physical Education Intervention Program in 4 and 5-Year-Old Preschool Children.

Authors:  Rubén Navarro-Patón; Julien Brito-Ballester; Silvia Pueyo Villa; Vanessa Anaya; Marcos Mecías-Calvo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Assessment of Validity of Children's Movement Skill Quotient (CMSQ) Based on the Physical Education Classroom Environment.

Authors:  Jindong Chang; Yan Li; Hanbing Song; Liming Yong; Lin Luo; Zhanjia Zhang; Naiqing Song
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Is Motor Milestone Assessment in Infancy Valid and Scaled Equally Across Sex, Birth Weight, and Gestational Age? Findings From the Millennium Cohort Study.

Authors:  Denise de Almeida Maia; Farid Bardid; Tobias Koch; Paola Okuda; George Ploubidis; Anders Nordahl-Hansen; Michael Eid; Hugo Cogo-Moreira
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-05

9.  The Fitness Barometer: A Best Practice Example for Monitoring Motor Performance With Pooled Data Collected From Practitioners.

Authors:  Tanja Eberhardt; Klaus Bös; Claudia Niessner
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-12-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.