Literature DB >> 30604285

Coping with formalin banning in pathology: under vacuum long-term tissue storage with no added formalin.

Luca Mastracci1,2, Alessandro Gambella3, Alberto Bragoni3, Simona Pigozzi3,4, Lorenza Pastorino5, Irene Vanni5, Ilaria Tosi4, Michela Campora3, Roberto Fiocca3,4, Federica Grillo3,4.   

Abstract

Formalin is toxic and has recently been classified as carcinogenic leading to a proposed European formalin ban. But, the pathology use of formalin has however been completely overlooked, and this is proving to be a relevant issue, as no alternative, reliable, tissue fixative is available. Various systems have been proposed to reduce formalin use and exposure; long-term storage and disposal of formalin is also a problem. With this in mind, under vacuum sealing (UVS) systems have been proposed for transportation/storage, however, for how long tissue retains its characteristics (morphological and molecular) is unknown. This study aims to compare histology specimens stored by formalin immersion (FI) and specimens stored after fixation with UVS technique with no additional formalin, at different time periods. Twenty tissue samples (10FI; 10UVS) were stored for different time periods (15 days, 1-2-3-6-12 months) for a total of 120 samples, compared with regard to their morphology, histochemistry, immunoreactivity (24 specific antibodies) and DNA status. All samples showed well-preserved morphology and overlapping staining quality. A significant reduction in immunoreactivity was however identified in the various time periods, particularly for heat pre-treated nuclear antigens, and this commenced earlier (1 month) for FI. UVS storage showed higher DNA content than FI but slightly poorer DNA integrity. These results add important knowledge to the use of UVS in daily practice, as long-term storage of pre-fixed tissue in UVS is not detrimental to the quality of tissue while having the boon of using very little formalin with less operator exposure and lower disposal costs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Formalin ban; Pathology; Safety; Vacuum storage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30604285     DOI: 10.1007/s00418-018-1765-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol        ISSN: 0948-6143            Impact factor:   4.304


  3 in total

1.  In focus in HCB.

Authors:  Douglas J Taatjes; Jürgen Roth
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.304

2.  In focus in HCB.

Authors:  Douglas J Taatjes; Jürgen Roth
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 4.304

3.  Coping with Tissue Sampling in Suboptimal Conditions: Comparison of Different Tissue Preservation Methods for Histological and Molecular Analysis.

Authors:  Arturo Nicoletti; Paola Pregel; Laura Starvaggi Cucuzza; Francesca Tiziana Cannizzo; Alessandra Sereno; Frine Eleonora Scaglione
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.