Literature DB >> 30604250

Long-term outcome of laparoscopic rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse.

H de Bruijn1, Y Maeda2,3,4, K-N Tan3, J T Jenkins3,4, R H Kennedy3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse (FTRP).
METHODS: Data of a prospectively maintained database were analysed. A structured telephone interview was conducted to assess a consecutive series of long-term outcomes of an unselected population who had laparoscopic rectopexy at a single centre between April 2006 and April 2014. The primary outcome was recurrence of FTRP. Secondary outcomes were functional outcomes and morbidity associated with the procedure.
RESULTS: A total of 80 patients (74 female, median age of 66 years, range 23-96 years) underwent a laparoscopic rectopexy, of whom 35 (44%) were for recurrent prolapse. Seventy-two patients (90%) had a posterior suture rectopexy, six (8%) had a ventral mesh rectopexy, one (1%) had a combination of both procedures, and one (1%) had a posterior suture rectopexy with a sacrocolpopexy. There was no conversion to open surgery. Three patients (4%) needed reoperation within 30 days after surgery: two due to small bowel obstruction and one for a suspected port site hernia. Seventy-four patients (93%) were available for either clinical follow-up (FU) or telephone interview and there were 17 (23%) recurrences of FTRP at the median FU of 57 months (range 1-121 months). The median time to recurrence was 12 months (range 1-103 months). Recurrence of FTRP was seen in nine patients (12%) within 1 year following surgery. A history of multiple previous prolapse repairs increased the risk of prolapse recurrence (odds ratio 8.33, 95% confidence interval 1.38-50.47, p = 0.020). Based on clinical follow-up of 71 patients up to 1 year, there were 41 patients (58%) who had faecal incontinence prior to rectopexy of whom two patients (5%) had complete resolution of symptoms and 14 (34%) had improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic rectopexy is a safe operation for full-thickness rectal prolapse. The durability of the repair diminished over time, particularly for patients operated on for recurrent prolapse.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic rectopexy; Long-term follow-up; Rectal prolapse

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30604250     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1913-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  4 in total

1.  In search of the optimal operation for rectal prolapse: the saga continues….

Authors:  W C Cirocco
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Mesh erosion into the rectum after laparoscopic posterior rectopexy: A case report.

Authors:  Shun Yamanaka; Tsuyoshi Enomoto; Shoko Moue; Yohei Owada; Yusuke Ohara; Tatsuya Oda
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-30

3.  A Case of Robotic Posterior Rectopexy for Full-thickness Rectal Prolapse.

Authors:  Shinsuke Suzuki; Teni Godai; Shin Kato; Atsushi Onodera; Kazuya Endo; Shizune Onuma; Yui Honjo; Junya Shirai; Masakatsu Numata; Yutaka Kumakiri; Shinichiro Suzuki; Yuji Yamamoto
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2022-01-28

4.  Clinical outcomes of surgical management for recurrent rectal prolapse: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Kwang Dae Hong; Keehoon Hyun; Jun Won Um; Seo-Gue Yoon; Do Yeon Hwang; Jaewon Shin; Dooseok Lee; Se-Jin Baek; Sanghee Kang; Byung Wook Min; Kyu Joo Park; Seung-Bum Ryoo; Heung-Kwon Oh; Min Hyun Kim; Choon Sik Chung; Yong Geul Joh
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 1.766

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.