Literature DB >> 30603582

Hydroxyapatite Nanorod-Modified Sand Blasted Titanium Disk for Endosseous Dental Implant Applications.

So Jung Park1, Bo Su Kim1, Kailash Chandra Gupta1,2, Dong Yun Lee1, Inn-Kyu Kang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sand blasted titanium (Ti) is commonly used in designing endosseous dental implants due to its biocompatibility and ability to form bonds with bone tissues. However, titanium implants do not induce strong interactions with teeth bones. To increase strong interactions between Ti disk implants and teeth bones, the l-glutamic acid grafted hydroxyapatite nanorods (nHA) were immobilized on albumin modified Ti disk implants (Ti-Alb).
METHODS: For modification of Ti disk implants by nHA, the l-glutamic acid grafted nHA was synthesized and then immobilized on albumin modified Ti disk implants. Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, scanning electron microscope; energy dispersive spectroscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy were used to confirm the modification of Ti disk implants. The bioactivity of nHA-modified Ti disk implants was evaluated by seeding MC3T3-E1 cells on Ti-nHA implants.
RESULTS: Characterization techniques have confirmed the successful modification of Ti disk implants by l-glutamic acid grafted nHA. The nHA-modified Ti disk implants have shown enhanced adhesion, proliferation and cytotoxicity of MC3T3-E1 cells in comparison to pristine Ti implants.
CONCLUSIONS: The modification of Ti implants by l-glutamic acid grafted nHA has produced highly osteogenic Ti disk plants in comparison to pristine Ti disk implants due to the formation of bioactive surfaces by hydroxyapatite nano rods on Ti disk implants. Ti-nHA disk implants showed enhanced adhesion, proliferation, and MC3T3-E1 cells viability in comparison to pristine Ti disk implants. Thus nHA might be to be useful to enhance the osseointegration of Ti implants with teeth bones.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hydroxyapatite; Implants; MC3T3-E1 cells; Osseointegration; Titanium

Year:  2018        PMID: 30603582      PMCID: PMC6171708          DOI: 10.1007/s13770-018-0151-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1738-2696            Impact factor:   4.169


  24 in total

Review 1.  Surface configurations of dental implants.

Authors:  J E Ellingsen
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.589

Review 2.  Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Heungsoo Shin; Seongbong Jo; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model.

Authors:  B Al-Nawas; K A Groetz; H Goetz; H Duschner; W Wagner
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  The effect of microstructured surfaces and laminin-derived peptide coatings on soft tissue interactions with titanium dental implants.

Authors:  Sandra Werner; Olivier Huck; Benoît Frisch; Dominique Vautier; René Elkaim; Jean-Claude Voegel; Gérard Brunel; Henri Tenenbaum
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions.

Authors:  Ann Wennerberg; Tomas Albrektsson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 6.  Material fundamentals and clinical performance of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings: a review.

Authors:  L Sun; C C Berndt; K A Gross; A Kucuk
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2001

7.  Biomechanical evaluation of dental implants with different surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbits.

Authors:  Jung-Woo Koh; Jae-Ho Yang; Jung-Suk Han; Jai-Bong Lee; Sung-Hun Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Biomechanical and histomorphometric study of dental implants with different surface characteristics.

Authors:  In-Sung Yeo; Jung-Suk Han; Jae-Ho Yang
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.368

9.  Five-year results of implants with an oxidized surface placed predominantly in soft quality bone and subjected to immediate occlusal loading.

Authors:  Roland Glauser; Anja Zembic; Petra Ruhstaller; Simone Windisch
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Osseous healing characteristics of three different implant types.

Authors:  Werner Zechner; Stefan Tangl; Gabor Fürst; Gabor Tepper; Ulf Thams; Georg Mailath; Georg Watzek
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.977

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Challenges of Engineering Biomimetic Dental and Paradental Tissues.

Authors:  Mohammed E Grawish; Lamyaa M Grawish; Hala M Grawish; Mahmoud M Grawish; Salwa A El-Negoly
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 4.169

Review 2.  Near-Infrared Contrast Agents for Bone-Targeted Imaging.

Authors:  Jin Seok Jung; Danbi Jo; Gayoung Jo; Hoon Hyun
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.169

3.  Effects of local application of the ankaferd blood stopper on osseointegration in three different surface titanium implants.

Authors:  Erhan Cahit Ozcan; Mehmet Gul; Serkan Dundar; Alihan Bozoglan; Necmettin Karasu; Ali Bal; Nedim Gunes; Muhammet Bahattin Bingul
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-07-17

4.  Efficiency of Nanohydroxyapatite on Repairing Type II Diabetes Dental Implant-Bone Defect.

Authors:  Dong Ji; Dapeng Lu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.246

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.