Yukio Ikeda1, Shoko Tsukube1, Takashi Kadowaki2, Masato Odawara3. 1. Sanofi K.K., Tokyo Opera City Tower, 3-20-2 Nishi-shinjyuku, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, 163-1488 Japan. 2. 2Department of Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033 Japan. 3. 3Department of Diabetology, Metabolism, and Endocrinology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023 Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify diabetes-related factors associated with achieving HbA1c <7.0 % after the initiation of basal supported oral therapy (BOT) in insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes patients with an HbA1c value of ≥6.5 % during the previous 4 weeks, using data from Add-on Lantus® to Oral Hypoglycemic Agents 2 (ALOHA2) study, a 24-week observational study on Japanese type 2 diabetes patients. METHODS: Patients were categorized into two groups: HbA1c <7.0 % at the final evaluation point (at 24 weeks or the last visit) as HbA1c-target-achieved; HbA1c ≥7.0 % as target-not-achieved. Associations between baseline factors and HbA1c <7.0 % achievement were explored using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 1520 patients in the study, 400 patients (26.3 %) achieved HbA1c <7.0 %. Patients with diabetes duration of <1 year and between ≥1 and <2 years [odds ratio (OR): 5.27, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.13-24.51; OR: 3.77, 95 % CI 1.19-11.93, respectively], those on one pre-study orally administered antidiabetic agent (OAD) (OR: 2.42, 95 % CI 1.12-5.22), and those with absence of diabetic neuropathy (OR: 2.54, 95 % CI 1.12-5.76) were more likely to achieve HbA1c <7.0 % than those with duration of ≤15 years, ≥4 pre-study OADs, and neuropathy, respectively. Achievement of HbA1c <7.0 % among patients increased by approximately 20 % for each 1 % decrease in HbA1c level at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Shorter diabetes duration, pre-study regimen of one OAD, absence of neuropathy, and lower HbA1c level at baseline were associated with achievement of HbA1c <7.0 %, suggesting that earlier initiation of BOT leads to good HbA1c control in insulin-naïve Japanese type 2 diabetes patients, consistent with our early ALOHA study.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify diabetes-related factors associated with achieving HbA1c <7.0 % after the initiation of basal supported oral therapy (BOT) in insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes patients with an HbA1c value of ≥6.5 % during the previous 4 weeks, using data from Add-on Lantus® to Oral Hypoglycemic Agents 2 (ALOHA2) study, a 24-week observational study on Japanese type 2 diabetes patients. METHODS: Patients were categorized into two groups: HbA1c <7.0 % at the final evaluation point (at 24 weeks or the last visit) as HbA1c-target-achieved; HbA1c ≥7.0 % as target-not-achieved. Associations between baseline factors and HbA1c <7.0 % achievement were explored using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 1520 patients in the study, 400 patients (26.3 %) achieved HbA1c <7.0 %. Patients with diabetes duration of <1 year and between ≥1 and <2 years [odds ratio (OR): 5.27, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.13-24.51; OR: 3.77, 95 % CI 1.19-11.93, respectively], those on one pre-study orally administered antidiabetic agent (OAD) (OR: 2.42, 95 % CI 1.12-5.22), and those with absence of diabetic neuropathy (OR: 2.54, 95 % CI 1.12-5.76) were more likely to achieve HbA1c <7.0 % than those with duration of ≤15 years, ≥4 pre-study OADs, and neuropathy, respectively. Achievement of HbA1c <7.0 % among patients increased by approximately 20 % for each 1 % decrease in HbA1c level at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Shorter diabetes duration, pre-study regimen of one OAD, absence of neuropathy, and lower HbA1c level at baseline were associated with achievement of HbA1c <7.0 %, suggesting that earlier initiation of BOT leads to good HbA1c control in insulin-naïve Japanese type 2 diabetes patients, consistent with our early ALOHA study.
Authors: William H Polonsky; Lawrence Fisher; Susan Guzman; Leonel Villa-Caballero; Steven V Edelman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Hertzel C Gerstein; Jackie Bosch; Gilles R Dagenais; Rafael Díaz; Hyejung Jung; Aldo P Maggioni; Janice Pogue; Jeffrey Probstfield; Ambady Ramachandran; Matthew C Riddle; Lars E Rydén; Salim Yusuf Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-06-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mark Peyrot; Richard R Rubin; Torsten Lauritzen; Soren E Skovlund; Frank J Snoek; David R Matthews; Rüdiger Landgraf; Line Kleinebreil Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: T Vilsbøll; J Rosenstock; H Yki-Järvinen; W T Cefalu; Y Chen; E Luo; B Musser; P J Andryuk; Y Ling; K D Kaufman; J M Amatruda; S S Engel; L Katz Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 6.577
Authors: David M Nathan; John B Buse; Mayer B Davidson; Ele Ferrannini; Rury R Holman; Robert Sherwin; Bernard Zinman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-10-22 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Juliana C N Chan; Juan Jose Gagliardino; Sei Hyun Baik; Jean-Marc Chantelot; Sandra R G Ferreira; Nicolae Hancu; Hasan Ilkova; Ambady Ramachandran; Pablo Aschner Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-11-25 Impact factor: 17.152