Literature DB >> 30602975

Predictors of oesophageal candidiasis in persons with or without HIV infection.

Martha F Mushi1, Nathaniel Ngeta2, Mariam M Mirambo1, Stephen E Mshana1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30602975      PMCID: PMC6306978          DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v18i2.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Afr Health Sci        ISSN: 1680-6905            Impact factor:   0.927


× No keyword cloud information.
In reply, With great curiosity we have read the letter to editor by Bongomin F. and colleagues1 written as a comment to our recent published article in African Health Sciences2, we appreciate their interest to our article and inputs. The interest of the study was to investigate the risk factors for esophageal candidiasis (EC). The risk factors are clearly indicated in the original manuscript regardless of HIV status1. In addition, HIV was also analysed as one of the risk factor as previously reported elsewhere 3,4. The increase in age was found to protect the patients from developing EC as previous published5. In order not to confuse the reader, the odd ratio and 95%confidence interval for age variable in Table 2 in the original article1 was reversed to show the decrease in age as the risk of EC and presented in the abstract and content of the original manuscript1. In addition, in this letter to editor we have included results regarding factors associated with EC in HIV negative individuals. Of 554 HIV negative patients, 20(3.6%) had EC. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, increase in age independently protected HIV negative population from getting EC (OR 0.95, 95%CI; 0.92–0.99; p=0.0035), whilebeing female (OR 11.74, 95%CI; 1.55–88.82; p=0.017), alcohol use(OR 20.45, 95%CI; 4.89–86.56; <=0.001), smoking(OR 5.44, 95%CI; 1.18–25.12; p=0.03), antibiotic use(OR 5.2, 95%CI; 1.67–16.21; p<0.005), and having peptic ulcer diseases (OR 8.24, 95%CI; 2.21–30.72; p<0.002) independently predicted EC among HIV negative patients (table 4).
Table 4

Risk factors associated with esophageal candidiasis among HIV negative patients attending e ndoscopy unit (n=554)

VariableUnivariateMultivariate
EC n (%)OR(95%CI)P valueOR(95%CI)P
Age*3931–500.99(0.96–1.02)0.3650.95(0.92–0.99)0.035
Sex
Male (307)11(3.6)1
Female (247)9(3.6)1.02(0.414–2.496)0.9711.74(1.55–88.82)0.017
Alcohol
No (475)6(1.3)1
Yes (79)14(17.7)16.8(6.25–45.35)<0.00120.45(4.89–86.56)<0.001
Smoking
No (515)13(2.5)1
Yes (39)7(18)8.45(3.15–22.64)<0.0015.44(1.18–25.12)0.03
Corticosteroid use
No (551)18(3.3)1
Yes (3)2(66.7)59.2(5.13–683.5)0.001
Clinical presentation
No (241)3(1.2)1
Yes (313)17(5.43)4.56(1.32–15.73)0.0163.90(0.90–16.85)0.068
Antibiotics use
No (448)9(2.01)1
Yes (106)11(10.38)5.64(2.27–14.01)<0.0015.2(1.67–16.21)0.005
Diabetic
Negative (542)14(2.6)1
Positive (12)6(50.0)37.7(10.81–131.62)<0.001
PUD
No (473)13(2.8)1
Yes (81)7(8.6)3.35(1.29–8.66)0.0138.24(2.21–30.72)0.002
Asthma
No (550)18(3.27)1
Yes (4)2(50.0)29.56(3.94–221.79)0.001

PUD is the peptic ulcer diseases; some known variable like use of corticosteroid, having diabetic and asthma were not include in multivariate analysis because the patients with EC were very few which could lead to a very wide confidence interval.

Risk factors associated with esophageal candidiasis among HIV negative patients attending e ndoscopy unit (n=554) PUD is the peptic ulcer diseases; some known variable like use of corticosteroid, having diabetic and asthma were not include in multivariate analysis because the patients with EC were very few which could lead to a very wide confidence interval. Furthermore, we have noted that, the original published article did not incorporate the corrections which were presented during proofreading, for this reason we have presented the correct table 3 as seen below:
Table 3

Characteristics of HIV negative patients with EC

S/numberSexAgePresentationAlcoholSmokingAntibioticDiabeticCirrhosisPUDAsthma
1Male20HemoptysisYesYesNoNoYesNoNo
2Female24Ep. painNoNoYesNoNoYesNo
3Male32Ep. PainYesYesYesNoNoNoNo
4Female30Ep. PainYesNoYesNoNoNoNo
5Male47DysphagiaYesYesYesYesNoNoNo
6Female17DysphagiaNoNoNoNoNoNoYes
7Male40Ep. painYesNoYesNoNoYesNo
8Female38Ep. painYesNoNoYesNoNoNo
9Female47Ep. painNoNoNoYesNoNoNo
10Male77Ep. painYesYesYesNoNoNoNo
11Female38Ep. painNoNoYesNoNoYesNo
12Male34UGIBYesYesNoNoNoYesNo
13Female60Ep. painYesNoYesNoNoYesNo
14Male28Ep. painYesYesNoNoNoNoNo
15Male40DysphagiaYesNoNoYesNoYesNo
16Male36Ep. painYesNoYesYesNoNoNo
17Male44UGIBYesYesNoNoYesNoNo
18Female62Ep. painNoNoNoYesNoNoNo
19Female33Ep. painYesNoYesNoNoYesNo
20Male23Ep. painNoNoYesNoNoNoYes

Note; Ep. Pain is epigastric pain and UGIB is upper gastro intestinal bleeding

Characteristics of HIV negative patients with EC Note; Ep. Pain is epigastric pain and UGIB is upper gastro intestinal bleeding
  4 in total

1.  Risk factors for esophageal candidiasis.

Authors:  A Chocarro Martínez; F Galindo Tobal; G Ruiz-Irastorza; A González López; F Alvarez Navia; C Ochoa Sangrador; M I Martín Arribas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Predictive value of CD4 lymphocyte numbers for the development of opportunistic infections and malignancies in HIV-infected persons.

Authors:  S M Crowe; J B Carlin; K I Stewart; C R Lucas; J F Hoy
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1988)       Date:  1991

Review 3.  Aging, the gastrointestinal tract, and risk of acid-related disease.

Authors:  David A Greenwald
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-09-06       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Predictors of esophageal candidiasis among patients attending endoscopy unit in a tertiary hospital, Tanzania: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Martha F Mushi; Nathaniel Ngeta; Mariam M Mirambo; Stephen E Mshana
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.927

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.