| Literature DB >> 30602681 |
Mingliang Gao1, Beihua Bao2, Yudan Cao3, Mingqiu Shan4, Fangfang Cheng5, Miao Jiang6, Peidong Chen7, Li Zhang8.
Abstract
Carbonized pollen grains of Typha (CPT) were widely used in clinical for antithrombosis, wound and bleeding in China. In order to ensure the role of drugs, it is very important to control the quality of drugs. However, there is a lack of monitoring methods in the process of charcoal preparation. To characterize the process of CPT, we used thermal analysis, scanning electron microscope (SEM), color measurement, Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR) and HPLC. In this study, 7 min was the optimal processing time and the heating process condition should be controlled under 272.35 ± 7.23 °C. This comprehensive strategy to depict the whole carbonizing process would provide new ideas for researches on quality control of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) and processing theory of charcoal medicine.Entities:
Keywords: Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR); carbonizing process; pollen grains of Typha; thermal analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30602681 PMCID: PMC6337546 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24010128
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Scanning Electron Microscope of pollen Typha (PT) samples during frying processes.
The values of color measurement of PT.
| Sample | L* | a* | b* | dL* | da* | db* | dE*ab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PT | 65.26 | 5.42 | 45.96 | −9.77 | 3.85 | 27.09 | 29.06 |
| 0.5 min | 64.19 | 5.55 | 44.91 | −10.83 | 3.98 | 26.04 | 28.48 |
| 1.0 min | 64.19 | 5.68 | 44.45 | −10.84 | 4.1 | 25.58 | 28.09 |
| 1.5 min | 61.1 | 6.36 | 42.8 | −13.93 | 4.78 | 23.93 | 28.1 |
| 2.0 min | 59.76 | 6.93 | 42.53 | −15.26 | 5.36 | 23.66 | 28.66 |
| 2.5 min | 57.19 | 7.64 | 39.26 | −17.83 | 6.07 | 20.39 | 27.76 |
| 3.0 min | 53.93 | 8.09 | 35.31 | −21.09 | 6.52 | 16.44 | 27.53 |
| 3.5 min | 49.86 | 9.08 | 32.18 | −25.17 | 7.51 | 13.32 | 29.44 |
| 4.0 min | 47.3 | 10.03 | 30.67 | −27.73 | 8.46 | 11.8 | 31.3 |
| 4.5 min | 47.12 | 10.22 | 30.69 | −27.9 | 8.65 | 11.82 | 31.51 |
| 5.0 min | 42.18 | 10.57 | 27.95 | −32.84 | 9.0 | 9.08 | 35.25 |
| 5.5 min | 38.54 | 10.59 | 25.54 | −36.48 | 9.02 | 6.67 | 38.17 |
| 6.0 min | 34.32 | 10.35 | 23.18 | −40.7 | 8.78 | 4.31 | 41.86 |
| 6.5 min | 26.86 | 9.03 | 17.24 | −48.16 | 7.45 | −1.63 | 48.76 |
| 7.0 min | 23.28 | 8.09 | 14.21 | −51.74 | 6.51 | −4.66 | 52.36 |
| 7.5 min | 21.48 | 7.0 | 11.28 | −53.54 | 5.43 | −7.59 | 54.35 |
| 8.0 min | 18.37 | 5.88 | 8.97 | −56.65 | 4.31 | −9.9 | 57.67 |
| 8.5 min | 18.24 | 5.61 | 8.25 | −56.79 | 4.03 | 10.62 | 57.91 |
| 9.0 min | 15.25 | 4.25 | 6.21 | −59.77 | 2.68 | 12.66 | 61.16 |
| 9.5 min | 15.08 | 4.26 | 6.16 | −59.94 | 2.69 | −12.7 | 61.34 |
| 10.0 min | 13.89 | 3.15 | 4.19 | −61.13 | 1.58 | 14.68 | 62.89 |
Notes: L*: the brightness of the color; a*: the degree of red or green; b*: the degree of yellow or blue.
Figure 2The reflectivity of the PT in heating process (A) and the colors of samples (B).
Figure 3The FTIR of PT samples during the frying processes (A) and the ratio of band a to band b, c, and d (B).
Figure 4The TG-DTG curves of PT at four different heating rates. Notes: (A) was TG curves and (B) was DTG curves.
Parameters of pyrolysis characteristics of PT.
| Sample | β (°C·min−1) | T | T | T | DTG | Volatiles (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PT | 5 | 150 | 283 | 348 | 3.15 | 39.30 |
| 10 | 141 | 297 | 365 | 6.71 | 45.25 | |
| 15 | 170 | 303 | 367 | 9.03 | 42.90 | |
| 20 | 172 | 291 | 376 | 10.93 | 34.55 |
Parameters of PT calculated by Kissinger–Akahira Sunose (KAS), Ozawa–Flynn–Wall (OFW), and Friedman.
| Conversion (α) | Activation Energy Friedman model | R2 | Activation EnergyKAS Model | R2 | Activation Energy OFW Model | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.05 | −24.58 | 0.9419 | −19.72 | 0.8059 | −12.98 | 0.6691 |
| 0.10 | −15.96 | 0.0500 | −15.87 | 0.0417 | −8.01 | 0.0121 |
| 0.15 | 47.60 | 0.0980 | 49.48 | 0.0916 | 54.72 | 0.1202 |
| 0.20 | 131.72 | 0.5184 | 137.59 | 0.4983 | 138.83 | 0.5282 |
| 0.25 | 166.99 | 0.7681 | 174.65 | 0.7437 | 174.26 | 0.7618 |
| 0.30 | 168.57 | 0.8300 | 175.18 | 0.8116 | 174.94 | 0.8263 |
| 0.35 | 164.68 | 0.8604 | 170.79 | 0.8442 | 170.92 | 0.8574 |
| 0.40 | 154.01 | 0.8721 | 158.73 | 0.8555 | 159.62 | 0.8690 |
| 0.45 | 143.38 | 0.8730 | 147.36 | 0.8581 | 148.96 | 0.8726 |
| 0.50 | 129.49 | 0.8563 | 132.44 | 0.8420 | 134.95 | 0.8598 |
| 0.55 | 107.32 | 0.8112 | 108.87 | 0.7924 | 112.75 | 0.8194 |
| 0.60 | 85.59 | 0.7768 | 86.11 | 0.7518 | 91.42 | 0.7908 |
| 0.65 | 75.21 | 0.7814 | 74.72 | 0.7507 | 80.98 | 0.7966 |
| 0.70 | 80.95 | 0.8272 | 79.88 | 0.7965 | 86.28 | 0.8350 |
| 0.75 | 87.31 | 0.8650 | 85.88 | 0.8372 | 92.34 | 0.8683 |
| 0.80 | 64.88 | 0.8353 | 62.91 | 0.8009 | 70.97 | 0.8503 |
| 0.85 | 72.88 | 0.7266 | 69.07 | 0.6774 | 77.34 | 0.7444 |
| 0.90 | 142.02 | 0.9338 | 138.81 | 0.9317 | 144.01 | 0.9267 |
Recovery of the three constituents.
| Compound | Content (mg) | Detected (mg) | Added (mg) | Recovery (%) | Average Recovery (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Typhaneoside | 0.1806 | 0.3601 | 0.1828 | 98.21 | 96.67 | 1.70 |
| 0.1841 | 0.3609 | 0.1828 | 96.74 | |||
| 0.1822 | 0.3534 | 0.1828 | 93.65 | |||
| 0.1832 | 0.3630 | 0.1828 | 98.37 | |||
| 0.1818 | 0.3581 | 0.1828 | 96.43 | |||
| 0.1810 | 0.3576 | 0.1828 | 96.63 | |||
| Isorhamnetin-3- | 0.1466 | 0.2931 | 0.1445 | 101.40 | 101.84 | 1.77 |
| 0.1495 | 0.2963 | 0.1445 | 101.57 | |||
| 0.1443 | 0.2897 | 0.1445 | 100.62 | |||
| 0.1451 | 0.2946 | 0.1445 | 103.47 | |||
| 0.1440 | 0.2879 | 0.1445 | 99.63 | |||
| 0.1433 | 0.2941 | 0.1445 | 104.35 | |||
| Isorhamnetin | 0.002949 | 0.005846 | 0.002846 | 101.81 | 100.88 | 1.86 |
| 0.002903 | 0.005770 | 0.002846 | 100.73 | |||
| 0.002931 | 0.005698 | 0.002846 | 97.25 | |||
| 0.002953 | 0.005842 | 0.002846 | 101.53 | |||
| 0.002868 | 0.005782 | 0.002846 | 102.39 | |||
| 0.002886 | 0.005777 | 0.002846 | 101.57 |
Figure 5Estimation of activation energy using the KAS, OFW, and Friedman models for PT. Notes: Linear relationship curves (A–C) were made according to KAS, OFW and Friedman models at different conversion rates (from 0.05 to 0.90), respectively; (D) was the curve fitting charts of the three models.
Kinetic methods used in evaluating activation energy in the experiment.
| Method | Expression | Plots |
|---|---|---|
| Friedman |
| |
| KAS |
| |
| FWO |
|
Figure 6The content changes of the two main flavonoid glycosides and its aglycone in different samples heated from 1 to 10 min. (A) the HPLC chromatography of different samples from heating for 1 min to 10 min and (B) the ratio of compounds content in pollen grains compared with PT.
The gradient elution.
| Time(min) | A (%) | B (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 95.00 | 5.00 |
| 5.00 | 86.00 | 14.00 |
| 10.00 | 68.50 | 31.50 |
| 15.00 | 68.50 | 31.50 |
| 40.00 | 55.00 | 45.00 |
| 43.00 | 95.00 | 5.00 |
| 46.00 | 95.00 | 5.00 |
Calibration curves, limits of detection (LOD), and limits of quantitation (LOQ) of the three analytes.
| Component | Calibration Curves | r2 | Linear (μg) | LOQ (ng) | LOD (ng) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Typhaneoside | y = 11665x − 3.0371 | 0.9997 | 0.007516–0.4810 | 0.6413 | 0.4276 |
| Isorhamnetin-3- | y = 14729x − 2.4082 | 0.9997 | 0.004838–0.3096 | 1.032 | 0.4128 |
| Isorhamnetin | y = 33789x − 1.1673 | 0.9997 | 0.002021–0.03234 | 1.0870 | 0.3623 |