Literature DB >> 30602354

Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase Between 3 and 4.5 Hours in Low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

Ole Morten Rønning1,2, Nicola Logallo3, Bente Thommessen1, Håkon Tobro4, Vojtech Novotny5,6, Christopher E Kvistad5,6, Anne Hege Aamodt7, Halvor Næss5,6,8, Ulrike Waje-Andreassen5, Lars Thomassen5,6.   

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Thrombolysis with alteplase has beneficial effect on outcome and is safe within 4.5 hours. The present study compares the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase and alteplase in patients treated 3 to 4.5 hours after ischemic stroke. Methods- The data are from a prespecified substudy of patients included in The NOR-TEST (Norwegian Tenecteplase Stroke Trial), a randomized control trial comparing tenecteplase with alteplase. Results- The median admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for this study population was 3 (interquartile range, 2-6). In the intention-to-treat analysis, 57% of patients that received tenecteplase and 53% of patients that received alteplase reached good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1) at 3 months (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.68-2.10). The rates of intracranial hemorrhage in the first 48 hours were 5.7% in the tenecteplase group and 6.7% in the alteplase group (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.26-2.70). At 3 months, mortality was 5.7% and 4.5%, respectively. After excluding stroke mimics and patients with modified Rankin Scale score of >1 before stroke, the proportion of patients with good functional outcome was 61% in the tenecteplase group and 57% in the alteplase group (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.65-2.37). Conclusions- Tenecteplase is at least as effective as alteplase to achieve a good clinical outcome in patients with mild stroke treated between 3 and 4.5 hours after ischemic stroke. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01949948.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intention to treat analysis; intracranial hemorrhages; mortality; odds ratio; tenecteplase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30602354     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  4 in total

1.  The net benefit of thrombolysis in the management of intermediate risk pulmonary embolism: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pedro E Alcedo; Herney Andrés García-Perdomo; Cristhiam M Rojas-Hernandez
Journal:  EJHaem       Date:  2020-09-03

Review 2.  Intracranial Bleeding After Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Guillaume Charbonnier; Louise Bonnet; Alessandra Biondi; Thierry Moulin
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 3.  Tenecteplase vs. alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Neha Potla; Latha Ganti
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-01-04

Review 4.  Acute Stroke Management: Overview and Recent Updates.

Authors:  Mary Hollist; Larry Morgan; Rainier Cabatbat; Katherine Au; Maaida F Kirmani; Batool F Kirmani
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.745

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.