Literature DB >> 30602328

Male infertility problems of patients with strict sperm morphology between 5-14% may be missed with the current WHO guidelines.

Christian Fuglesang S Jensen1,2, Omar Khan1, Zainab G Nagras2, Jens Sønksen2, Mikkel Fode2, Peter B Østergren2, Tariq Shah3, Dana A Ohl1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In 2010 W.H.O. changed the lower reference limit for strict sperm morphology from 15 to 4%. The change was based on 5th percentile cut points from a meta-analysis on a published series of fertile men. This study investigates if patients referred for evaluation with sperm morphologies between 5-14% have identifiable etiologies of male infertility.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: I.R.B. approval was obtained to review records for patients referred to the University of Michigan Center of Reproductive Medicine between May 2012-May 2014 whom had a sperm morphology of 5-14%. Semen analysis, hormone levels, and information related to an infertility diagnosis, were recorded into a de-identified database. Patients were placed into the categories 'Varicocele', 'Hypogonadism', 'Intercourse problems', 'Anti-sperm antibodies (A.S.A.)', 'Other' or 'No diagnosis'.
RESULTS: A total of 253 patients were included in the study. Of these, 96/253 (38%) had a clinical varicocele; 44/253 (17%) hypogonadism; 4/253 (2%) intercourse problems; 11/253 (4%) evidence of sperm antibodies; and 15/253 (6%) had various other problems deemed potentially contributing causes of infertility. In all, nearly 67% of the subjects were identified to have a potential contributing etiology of male infertility. Similar results were found for the men with isolated low morphology (n = 194).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that 67% of men in infertile couples, who have strict sperm morphology between 5 and 14%, are found to have a potential contributing male factor infertility diagnosis. This raises the possibility that the new lower reference value for sperm morphology may result in missed opportunities for proper infertility assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Male infertility; reference values; semen analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30602328     DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2018.1548503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol        ISSN: 2168-1805            Impact factor:   1.612


  3 in total

1.  Reasons that should prompt a referral to a reproductive urologist: guidelines for the gynecologist and reproductive endocrinologist.

Authors:  Nicholas J Farber; Vinayak K Madhusoodanan; Sabrina A Gerkowicz; Premal Patel; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Gynecol Pelvic Med       Date:  2019-10-23

Review 2.  Pathogenesis of Autoimmune Male Infertility: Juxtacrine, Paracrine, and Endocrine Dysregulation.

Authors:  Valeriy A Chereshnev; Svetlana V Pichugova; Yakov B Beikin; Margarita V Chereshneva; Angelina I Iukhta; Yuri I Stroev; Leonid P Churilov
Journal:  Pathophysiology       Date:  2021-10-15

3.  Twenty-year experience with macro-area school screening for andrological disease in paediatric age.

Authors:  Nicola Zampieri; Simone Patanè; Francesco Saverio Camoglio
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 2.532

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.