Mark A Ferro1. 1. 1 School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Ontario.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study (1) describes the distribution of Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) scores in an epidemiological sample of youth, (2) reports its item correlations and internal consistency reliability, (3) tests for measurement invariance by age (youth vs. adults) and sex, and (4) examines its predictive power for past-year psychiatric disorders. METHOD: Youth aged 15 to 19 years (n = 2010) and adults aged 20 to 64 years (n = 2010) from the Canadian Community Health Survey-Mental Health who completed the K6 were included. Past-year psychiatric disorders were measured using the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview 3.0 (WHO-CIDI). Polychoric correlation matrices and ordinal reliability coefficients were calculated to assess internal consistency of the K6, and confirmatory factor analysis was used to test for measurement invariance. Area under the curves (AUCs) were computed to determine the extent to which the K6 predicted a positive screen on the WHO-CIDI. RESULTS: K6 scores showed a J-shaped distribution, with >50% of youth having scores ≤3. Item and total scores were higher for females versus males. Item correlations were robust (0.31-0.78) and internal consistency was high (α = 0.86). Full measurement invariance was demonstrated between youth and adults, as well as between male and female youth. The K6 was a strong predictor of major depressive episode (AUC = 0.848), generalized anxiety disorder (AUC = 0.847), and bipolar disorder (AUC = 0.853). CONCLUSIONS: The K6 is a valid and reliable measure of psychological distress among youth. Its brevity and robust predictive power for psychiatric disorder confirm its utility in clinical and community settings to identify youth needing comprehensive psychiatric assessment.
OBJECTIVE: This study (1) describes the distribution of Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) scores in an epidemiological sample of youth, (2) reports its item correlations and internal consistency reliability, (3) tests for measurement invariance by age (youth vs. adults) and sex, and (4) examines its predictive power for past-year psychiatric disorders. METHOD: Youth aged 15 to 19 years (n = 2010) and adults aged 20 to 64 years (n = 2010) from the Canadian Community Health Survey-Mental Health who completed the K6 were included. Past-year psychiatric disorders were measured using the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview 3.0 (WHO-CIDI). Polychoric correlation matrices and ordinal reliability coefficients were calculated to assess internal consistency of the K6, and confirmatory factor analysis was used to test for measurement invariance. Area under the curves (AUCs) were computed to determine the extent to which the K6 predicted a positive screen on the WHO-CIDI. RESULTS: K6 scores showed a J-shaped distribution, with >50% of youth having scores ≤3. Item and total scores were higher for females versus males. Item correlations were robust (0.31-0.78) and internal consistency was high (α = 0.86). Full measurement invariance was demonstrated between youth and adults, as well as between male and female youth. The K6 was a strong predictor of major depressive episode (AUC = 0.848), generalized anxiety disorder (AUC = 0.847), and bipolar disorder (AUC = 0.853). CONCLUSIONS: The K6 is a valid and reliable measure of psychological distress among youth. Its brevity and robust predictive power for psychiatric disorder confirm its utility in clinical and community settings to identify youth needing comprehensive psychiatric assessment.
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Jamie Abelson; Olga Demler; Javier I Escobar; Miriam Gibbon; Margaret E Guyer; Mary J Howes; Robert Jin; William A Vega; Ellen E Walters; Philip Wang; Alan Zaslavsky; Hui Zheng Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2004 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Jennifer Greif Green; Michael J Gruber; Nancy A Sampson; Evelyn Bromet; Marius Cuitan; Toshi A Furukawa; Oye Gureje; Hristo Hinkov; Chi-Yi Hu; Carmen Lara; Sing Lee; Zeina Mneimneh; Landon Myer; Mark Oakley-Browne; Jose Posada-Villa; Rajesh Sagar; Maria Carmen Viana; Alan M Zaslavsky Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Jennifer Greif Green; Michael J Gruber; Nancy A Sampson; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Soraya Seedat; Kate Margaret Scott; Matthias C Angermeyer; Patricia Berglund; Evelyn J Bromet; Traolach S Brugha; Koen Demyttenaere; Giovanni de Girolamo; Josep Maria Haro; Robert Jin; Elie G Karam; Viviane Kovess-Masfety; Daphna Levinson; Maria Elena Medina Mora; Yutaka Ono; Johan Ormel; Beth-Ellen Pennell; Jose Posada-Villa; Nancy A Sampson; David Williams; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2009-07
Authors: R C Kessler; G Andrews; L J Colpe; E Hiripi; D K Mroczek; S L T Normand; E E Walters; A M Zaslavsky Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Paolo Fusar-Poli; Christoph U Correll; Celso Arango; Michael Berk; Vikram Patel; John P A Ioannidis Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2021-06 Impact factor: 79.683
Authors: Joanne R Beames; Sophie H Li; Jill M Newby; Kate Maston; Helen Christensen; Aliza Werner-Seidler Journal: Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health Date: 2021-12-18 Impact factor: 3.033
Authors: Hugues Sampasa-Kanyinga; Jean-Philippe Chaput; Gary S Goldfield; Ian Janssen; JianLi Wang; Hayley A Hamilton; Mark A Ferro; Ian Colman Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-27 Impact factor: 4.356