Literature DB >> 30602045

Medicaid Reimbursement for Common Orthopedic Procedures Is Not Consistent.

David S Casper, Gregory D Schroeder, Benjamin Zmistowski, Jeffery A Rihn, D Greg Anderson, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler.   

Abstract

Two major forms of physician reimbursement include Medicare (MCR; federally funded) and Medicaid (MCD; state funded). The only oversight provided to individual states for setting MCD reimbursement is that it must provide a standard payment that does not negatively affect patient care. The goals of this study were to determine the variability of MCD reimbursement for patients who require orthopedic procedures and to assess how this compares with regional MCR reimbursement. Medicaid reimbursement rates from each state were obtained for total knee arthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty, anterior cruciate ligament repair, rotator cuff repair, anterior cervical decompression and fusion, posterior lumbar decompression, carpal tunnel release, distal radius open reduction and internal fixation, proximal femur open reduction and internal fixation, and ankle open reduction and internal fixation. Discrepancy in reimbursement for these procedures and overall differences in MCD vs MCR reimbursement were determined. Average MCD reimbursement was 81.9% of MCR reimbursement. There was significant variation between states (37.7% to 147% of MCR reimbursement for all 10 procedures). Twenty and 40 states provided less than 75% and 100% of MCR reimbursements, respectively. Medicaid valued knee arthroplasty (91.4% of MCR reimbursement) over other common procedures. Conversely, carpal tunnel release (74.1% of MCR reimbursement; P=.004) had the lowest reimbursements. The most interstate variation was noted for anterior cruciate ligament reimbursement, ranging from 20.6% to 229% of local MCR reimbursement. Disparities were found between MCR and MCD when comparing identical procedures. Further research is necessary to understand the impact of these significant differences. It is likely that these discrepancies lead to suboptimal access to necessary orthopedic care. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(2):e193-e196.]. Copyright 2018, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30602045     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20181227-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  4 in total

1.  Variability in Medicaid Reimbursement in Hand Surgery May Lead to Inequality in Access to Patient Care.

Authors:  William Baker; Michael Rivlin; Samir Sodha; Michael Nakashian; Brian Katt; Daniel Fletcher; Kevin Lutsky; Pedro Beredjiklian
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2020-10-27

2.  Impact of Insurance and Practice Type on Access to Orthopaedic Sports Medicine.

Authors:  Weilong Shi; Albert Anastasio; Ndeye F Guisse; Razan Faraj; Omolola P Fakunle; Kirk Easley; Kyle E Hammond
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-07-31

3.  What Is the Financial Impact of Orthopaedic Sequelae of Intravenous Drug Use on Urban Tertiary-care Centers?

Authors:  Nishant Dwivedi; Mary A Breslin; Amber McDermott; Steve Lin; Heather A Vallier; Paul Tornetta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  A Proposed Personalized Spine Care Protocol (SpineScreen) to Treat Visualized Pain Generators: An Illustrative Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Reoperations between Targeted Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression Surgery, Minimally Invasive TLIF and Open Laminectomy.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Ivo Abraham; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Albert E Telfeian; Morgan P Lorio; Stefan Hellinger; Martin Knight; Paulo Sérgio Teixeira De Carvalho; Max Rogério Freitas Ramos; Álvaro Dowling; Manuel Rodriguez Garcia; Fauziyya Muhammad; Namath Hussain; Vicky Yamamoto; Babak Kateb; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.