| Literature DB >> 30602023 |
Jayna Raghwani1, Chieh-Hsi Wu2, Cynthia K Y Ho3, Menno De Jong3, Richard Molenkamp3, Janke Schinkel3, Oliver G Pybus4, Katrina A Lythgoe1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite recent breakthroughs in treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, we have limited understanding of how virus diversity generated within individuals impacts the evolution and spread of HCV variants at the population scale. Addressing this gap is important for identifying the main sources of disease transmission and evaluating the risk of drug-resistance mutations emerging and disseminating in a population.Entities:
Keywords: hepatitis C virus; molecular epidemiology; phylogenetics; population genetics; recombination; viral evolution; viral replication
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30602023 PMCID: PMC6500553 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiy747
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Infect Dis ISSN: 0022-1899 Impact factor: 5.226
Figure 1.A, Within-host hepatitis C virus (HCV) population demographic histories and (B) time-scaled phylogenies for the 4 HCV/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfected individuals. A, Dashed lines correspond to locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression fit through the lower and upper 95% highest posterior density estimates of Neτ, while the solid lines correspond to the smooth curve fitting to the mean Neτ over time. Abbreviations: Ne, effective population size; τ, viral generation time, in calendar time.
Marginal Likelihoods Estimated Under 2 Alternative Hypotheses to Explain the Observed Hepatitis C Virus Within-Host Population Dynamics in the 4 Individuals
| Individuals | BASTA | Bayesian Skyline |
|---|---|---|
| p4 | −10279.3 | −10243.3 |
| p37 | −9508.2 | −9521.5 |
| p53 | −5900.1 | −5949.7 |
| p61 | −10277.3 | −10305.4 |
The 2 hypotheses are a structured population (BASTA) and a single population changing in population size over time (Bayesian skyline coalescent). Greater support for a structured population is indicated if a higher marginal likelihood is observed with BASTA than for the Bayesian skyline coalescent model, and vice versa.
Mean Within-Host Evolutionary Rates in Hepatitis C Virus Envelope Glycoprotein
| Within-Host Evolutionary Rate, 10–2 substitutions/site/year (95% Credible Interval) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals | |||||
| Gene Region | Partition | p4 | p37 | p53 | p61 |
| E1 | CP1 + 2 | 1.942 (1.467, 2.465) | 0.193 (0.127, 0.257) | 0.240 (0.132, 0.347) | 0.211 (0.146, 0.278) |
| E2 | CP1 + 2 | 1.791 (1.303, 2.248) | 2.233 (1.602, 2.834) | 0.363 (0.237, 0.504) | 0.209 (0.159, 0.265) |
| HVR1 | CP1 + 2 | 3.361 (1.805, 6.255) | 4.841 (2.855, 6.727) | 3.540 (1.113, 8.772) | 1.475 (1.115, 1.921) |
| E1 | CP3 | 0.476 (0.224, 0.747) | 0.187 (0.119, 0.255) | 0.202 (0.109, 0.295) | 0.168 (0.129, 0.210) |
| E2 | CP3 | 0.572 (0.425, 0.722) | 0.443 (0.317, 0.584) | 0.221 (0.135, 0.314) | 0.257 (0.210, 0.313) |
| HVR1 | CP3 | 0.726 (0.272, 1.123) | 2.584 (0.927, 8.089) | 0.896 (0.191, 1.865) | 0.592 (0.271, 0.964) |
| Envelope | Total | 2.390 (2.014, 2.824) | 2.514 (2.030, 3.027) | 0.749 (0.503, 1.037) | 0.746 (0.650, 0.841) |
Figure 2.Mean amino acid diversity per site. The genomic regions (Core, E1, HVR1, and E2) are indicated above the plot. The shaded regions indicate putative neutralizing antibody epitopes. This information was collated from the Immune Epitope Database, which corresponds to regions in hepatitis C virus (irrespective of genotype or subtype) that have been experimentally confirmed to elicit an antibody response.
Figure 3.Divergence over time for each gene region (E1, E2, and HVR1 on top, middle, and bottom rows, respectively). Solid lines correspond to nonsynonymous divergence, while dashed lines correspond to synonymous divergence. Note, scales of the y-axes for HVR1 are different from those of E1 and E2.