| Literature DB >> 30601758 |
Salvatore Minisola1, Luciano Colangelo1, Cristiana Cipriani1, Jessica Pepe1, Dana Paulina Cook2, Chantal Mathieu2.
Abstract
Few topics have elicited more emotion than the issue of screening for vitamin D status and the discussion on the need for global supplementation with vitamin D metabolites. The importance of the problem is highlighted by the USPSTF posted draft research plan with the aim of making an update recommendations statement, possibly next year. Here, we discuss two different viewpoints on screening for vitamin D status: for and against. In the literature there are scientifically sound opinions supporting pro and cons positions. However, we believe that the best way to definitively elucidate this issue is the implementation of a randomized controlled trial evaluating clinical outcomes or harms in persons screened versus those not screened for vitamin D deficiency. The feasibility of such a trial is probably questionable owing to uncertainties still present concerning threshold for vitamin D sufficiency and end points (that is, for example, improved bone mineral density, reduced risk of falls and so on) to be reached.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30601758 DOI: 10.1530/EJE-18-0977
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Endocrinol ISSN: 0804-4643 Impact factor: 6.664