Wenjin Wang1, Sung Kang1, Iván Coto Hernández1, Nate Jowett1. 1. From the Surgical Photonics and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and Harvard Medical School; and the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Donor nerve myelinated axon counts correlate with functional outcomes in reanimation procedures; however, there exists no reliable means for their intraoperative quantification. In this article, the authors report a novel protocol for rapid quantification of myelinated axons from frozen sections, and demonstrate its applicability to surgical practice. METHODS: The impact of various fixation and FluoroMyelin Red staining strategies on resolved myelin sheath morphology from cryosections of rat and rabbit femoral and sciatic nerves was assessed. A protocol comprising fresh cryosection and rapid staining was developed, and histomorphometric results were compared against conventional osmium-postfixed, resin-embedded, toluidine blue-stained sections of rat sciatic nerve. The rapid protocol was applied for intraoperative quantification of donor nerve myelinated axon count in a cross-facial nerve grafting procedure. RESULTS: Resolution of myelinated axon morphology suitable for counting was realized within 10 minutes of tissue harvest. Although mean myelinated axon diameter appeared larger using the rapid fresh-frozen as compared to conventional nerve processing techniques (mean ± SD; rapid, 9.25 ± 0.62 μm; conventional, 6.05 ± 0.71 μm; p < 0.001), no difference in axon counts was observed on high-power fields (rapid, 429.42 ± 49.32; conventional, 460.32 ± 69.96; p = 0.277). Whole nerve myelinated axon counts using the rapid protocol herein (8435.12 ± 1329.72) were similar to prior reports using conventional osmium processing of rat sciatic nerve. CONCLUSIONS: A rapid protocol for quantification of myelinated axon counts from peripheral nerves using widely available equipment and techniques has been described, rendering possible intraoperative assessment of donor nerve suitability for reanimation.
BACKGROUND:Donor nerve myelinated axon counts correlate with functional outcomes in reanimation procedures; however, there exists no reliable means for their intraoperative quantification. In this article, the authors report a novel protocol for rapid quantification of myelinated axons from frozen sections, and demonstrate its applicability to surgical practice. METHODS: The impact of various fixation and FluoroMyelin Red staining strategies on resolved myelin sheath morphology from cryosections of rat and rabbit femoral and sciatic nerves was assessed. A protocol comprising fresh cryosection and rapid staining was developed, and histomorphometric results were compared against conventional osmium-postfixed, resin-embedded, toluidine blue-stained sections of rat sciatic nerve. The rapid protocol was applied for intraoperative quantification of donor nerve myelinated axon count in a cross-facial nerve grafting procedure. RESULTS: Resolution of myelinated axon morphology suitable for counting was realized within 10 minutes of tissue harvest. Although mean myelinated axon diameter appeared larger using the rapid fresh-frozen as compared to conventional nerve processing techniques (mean ± SD; rapid, 9.25 ± 0.62 μm; conventional, 6.05 ± 0.71 μm; p < 0.001), no difference in axon counts was observed on high-power fields (rapid, 429.42 ± 49.32; conventional, 460.32 ± 69.96; p = 0.277). Whole nerve myelinated axon counts using the rapid protocol herein (8435.12 ± 1329.72) were similar to prior reports using conventional osmium processing of rat sciatic nerve. CONCLUSIONS: A rapid protocol for quantification of myelinated axon counts from peripheral nerves using widely available equipment and techniques has been described, rendering possible intraoperative assessment of donor nerve suitability for reanimation.
Authors: Gregory H Borschel; David H Kawamura; Rahul Kasukurthi; Daniel A Hunter; Ronald M Zuker; Albert S Woo Journal: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Date: 2011-10-10 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Steffen U Eisenhardt; Nils A Eisenhardt; Jan R Thiele; G Björn Stark; Holger Bannasch Journal: JAMA Facial Plast Surg Date: 2014 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 4.611
Authors: Joseph J Schreiber; David J Byun; Mahmoud M Khair; Lauren Rosenblatt; Steve K Lee; Scott W Wolfe Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Bethany A Stahl; Robert Peuß; Brittnee McDole; Alexander Kenzior; James B Jaggard; Karin Gaudenz; Jaya Krishnan; Suzanne E McGaugh; Erik R Duboue; Alex C Keene; Nicolas Rohner Journal: Dev Dyn Date: 2019-04-15 Impact factor: 3.780