Literature DB >> 30601257

The Abdominal Hernia-Q: Development, Psychometric Evaluation, and Prospective Testing.

Jaclyn T Mauch1, Fabiola A Enriquez1, Judy A Shea2, Frances K Barg3, Irfan A Rhemtulla1, Robyn B Broach1, Sheri L Thrippleton1, John P Fischer1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our study completes the development and estimates the psychometric properties of a novel, ventral hernia-specific patient reported outcomes (PRO) tool-the Abdominal Hernia-Q (AHQ). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: A standardized method for measuring hernia-related PRO has not been identified. There remains a need for a broadly applicable, hernia-specific tool that incorporates patient viewpoints and offers pre- and postoperative forms.
METHODS: Concept elicitation interviews, focus groups, and cognitive debriefing interviews were completed to define content. The preoperative AHQ was administered to patients scheduled to have a ventral hernia repair (VHR). The postoperative AHQ was administered to patients within 24 months post-VHR. The SF-12 and HerQLes were concurrently administered. Psychometric evaluation was performed. Subsequently, the AHQ (pre: 8 items; post: 16 items) underwent prospective testing.
RESULTS: Cross-sectional evaluations of patient responses to the AHQ (pre n = 104; post n = 261) demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach α pre = 0.86; post = 0.90) and moderate disattenuated correlations with the HerQLes (pre r = -0.71 and post r = -0.70) and the SF-12 domains (pre and post r ≥ 0.5 for 7 of 8 domains). Principal components analyses produced 2 factors preoperatively and 3 factors postoperatively. In prospective testing (n = 67), the AHQ scores replicated the cross-sectional psychometric results and suggested sensitivity to clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Through patient involvement and rigorous, iterative psychometric evaluation, we have produced substantial data to suggest the validity and reliability of AHQ scores in measuring hernia-specific PRO. The AHQ advances the clinical management and treatment of patients with abdominal hernias by providing a more complete understanding of patient-defined outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 30601257     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  6 in total

1.  Shifting the Goalpost in Ventral Hernia Care: 5-year Outcomes after Ventral Hernia Repair with Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate Mesh.

Authors:  Ankoor A Talwar; Nikhita J Perry; Phoebe B McAuliffe; Abhishek A Desai; Sheri Thrippleton; Robyn B Broach; John P Fischer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 2.920

Review 2.  Biologic Mesh in Surgery: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of Selected Outcomes in 51 Studies and 6079 Patients.

Authors:  David J Samson; Mahir Gachabayov; Rifat Latifi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Computed Tomography Image Analysis in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Omar Elfanagely; Joseph A Mellia; Sammy Othman; Marten N Basta; Jaclyn T Mauch; John P Fischer
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-12-16

4.  A Systematic Review of Health State Utility Values in the Plastic Surgery Literature.

Authors:  Adrienne N Christopher; Martin P Morris; Viren Patel; Kevin Klifto; John P Fischer
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-11-29

5.  Health-related quality of life in abdominal wall hernia: let's ask patients what matters to them?

Authors:  O A Smith; M F Mierzwinski; P Chitsabesan; S Chintapatla
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.920

6.  The Abdominal Hernia-Q: a critical analysis of the components that impact quality-of-life.

Authors:  G Onyekaba; J T Mauch; V Patel; R B Broach; S Thrippleton; J P Fischer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.920

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.