Literature DB >> 30601058

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a placebo-controlled randomized trial evaluating the effectiveness of arthroscopic subacromial decompression in patients with subacromial shoulder pain.

I Rombach1, N Merritt2, B A Shirkey2, J L Rees2, J A Cook2, C Cooper1, A J Carr1, D J Beard2, A M Gray3.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aims of this study were to compare the use of resources, costs, and quality of life outcomes associated with subacromial decompression, arthroscopy only (placebo surgery), and no treatment for subacromial pain in the United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS), and to estimate their cost-effectiveness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The use of resources, costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were assessed in the trial at six months and one year. Results were extrapolated to two years after randomization. Differences between treatment arms, based on the intention-to-treat principle, were adjusted for covariates and missing data were handled using multiple imputation. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated, with uncertainty around the values estimated using bootstrapping.
RESULTS: Cumulative mean QALYs/mean costs of health care service use and surgery per patient from baseline to 12 months were estimated as 0.640 (standard error (se) 0.024)/£3147 (se 166) in the decompression arm, 0.656 (se 0.020)/£2830 (se 183) in the arthroscopy only arm and 0.522 (se 0.029)/£1451 (se 151) in the no treatment arm. Statistically significant differences in cumulative QALYs and costs were found at six and 12 months for the decompression versus no treatment comparison only. The probabilities of decompression being cost-effective compared with no treatment at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per QALY were close to 0% at six months and approximately 50% at one year, with this probability potentially increasing for the extrapolation to two years. DISCUSSION: The evidence for cost-effectiveness at 12 months was inconclusive. Decompression could be cost-effective in the longer-term, but results of this analysis are sensitive to the assumptions made about how costs and QALYs are extrapolated beyond the follow-up of the trial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost-effectiveness analysis; Health economics; Placebo surgery; Quality-adjusted life years; Shoulder impingement; Subacromial decompression

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30601058     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B1.BJJ-2018-0555.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  5 in total

1.  Basal thumb osteoarthritis surgery improves health state utility irrespective of technique: a study of UK Hand Registry data.

Authors:  Jennifer C E Lane; Jeremy N Rodrigues; Dominic Furniss; Edward Burn; Robert Poulter; Matthew D Gardiner
Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol       Date:  2020-03-12

Review 2.  Cost Analysis in Shoulder Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Thomas Tischer; Robert Lenz; Jochen Breinlinger-O'Reilly; Christoph Lutter
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-05-13

Review 3.  Shoulder conditions and health related quality of life and utility: a current concepts review.

Authors:  Christian Shigley; Andrew Green
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-11-20

4.  Implementing the "Getting It Right First Time" (GIRFT) Report Recommendations: The Results of Introducing a Shoulder and Elbow Multidisciplinary Team.

Authors:  Hammad Parwaiz; Robert Whitham; Matthew Flintoftburt; Andrew Tasker; David Woods
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-20

5.  Concurrent cisplatin or cetuximab with radiotherapy for HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer: Medical resource use, costs, and quality-adjusted survival from the De-ESCALaTE HPV trial.

Authors:  David A Jones; Pankaj Mistry; Matthew Dalby; Tessa Fulton-Lieuw; Anthony H Kong; Janet Dunn; Hisham M Mehanna; Alastair M Gray
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 9.162

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.