Literature DB >> 30601052

Survivorship and long-term outcome of a consecutive series of 200 Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR) implants.

T Clough1, K Bodo2, H Majeed1, J Davenport1, M Karski1.   

Abstract

AIMS: We report the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of a consecutive series of 200 total ankle arthroplasties (TAAs, 184 patients) at a single centre using the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR) implants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 1993 and February 2000, 200 consecutive STAR prostheses were implanted in 184 patients by a single surgeon. Demographic and clinical data were collected prospectively and the last available status was recorded for further survival analysis. All surviving patients underwent regular clinical and radiological review. Pain and function were assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot scoring system. The principal endpoint of the study was failure of the implant requiring revision of one or all of the components. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated with 95% confidence intervals and the rate of failure calculated for each year.
RESULTS: A total of 84 patients (87 ankles) were alive by the end of this study. Of the surviving 84 patients (87 ankles; rheumatoid arthritis (RA), n = 40; OA, n = 47), 45 were women and 39 were men, with a mean age of 54 years (18 to 72 years) at the time of surgery. A total of 32 implants failed (16%), requiring revision surgery. The mean time to revision was 80 months (2 to 257). The implant survival at 15.8 years, using revision as an endpoint, was 76.16% (95% confidence interval (CI) 64.41 to 87.91). We found a steady but low decrease in survival over the study period. The mean AOFAS score improved from 28 (10 to 52) preoperatively to 61 (20 to 90) at long-term follow-up.
CONCLUSION: STAR prostheses in the United Kingdom have now been largely superseded by newer design TAAs, potentially with improved characteristics and surgical techniques. The long-term survivorship for the STAR prosthesis can provide a benchmark for these later designs of ankle arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle arthroplasty; Ankle prostheses; Failed arthroplasty; Implant survival

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30601052     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B1.BJJ-2018-0801.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  8 in total

1.  Complications and results of the arthrodesis after total ankle arthroplasty failure: a retrospective monocentric study of 12 cases.

Authors:  F Egrise; J Parot; C Bauer; F Galliot; M Kirsch; D Mainard
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-28

2.  Current concepts in the management of ankle arthritis.

Authors:  V Adukia; J Mangwani; R Issac; S Hussain; L Parker
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-04-08

3.  Long-term follow-up of Bologna-Oxford (BOX) total ankle arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alberto Bianchi; Nicolò Martinelli; Eleonora Caboni; Giorgio Raggi; Francesca Manfroni; Valerio Sansone
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The Epidemiology and Trends of Primary Total Ankle Arthroplasty and Revision Procedure in Korea between 2007 and 2017.

Authors:  Sung Jae Kim; Il Hoon Sung; Si Young Song; Young Hoon Jo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Comparison of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate skin adhesive and interrupted polypropylene sutures for wound closure in total ankle arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gun-Woo Lee; Woo Kyoung Kwak; Keun-Bae Lee
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Patient-Specific Instrumentation vs Standard Referencing in Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Comparison of the Radiologic Outcome.

Authors:  Lukas Heisler; Werner Vach; Georg Katz; Thomas Egelhof; Markus Knupp
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.569

7.  Finite element stress analysis of the bearing component and bone resected surfaces for total ankle replacement with different implant material combinations.

Authors:  Jian Yu; Dahang Zhao; Wen-Ming Chen; Pengfei Chu; Shuo Wang; Chao Zhang; Jiazhang Huang; Xu Wang; Xin Ma
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  What Are the Indications for Implant Revision in Three-component Total Ankle Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Daniel Richter; Nicola Krähenbühl; Roman Susdorf; Alexej Barg; Roxa Ruiz; Beat Hintermann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.