Literature DB >> 30600519

Intimate Partner Violence Screening in the Prenatal Period: Variation by State, Insurance, and Patient Characteristics.

Sarah Halpern-Meekin1, Molly Costanzo2, Deborah Ehrenthal3, Galena Rhoades4.   

Abstract

Objective To measure the proportion of women screened for IPV during prenatal care; to assess the predictors of prenatal IPV screening. Methods We use the CDC's 2012 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, representative of births in 24 states and New York City (N = 28,581). We calculated descriptive and logistic regressions, weighted to deal with state-clustered observations. Results 49.2% of women in our sample reported being screened for IPV while pregnant. There were higher screening rates among women of color, and those who had not completed high school, never been married, received WIC benefits, initiated prenatal care in the first trimester, and were publicly insured. State screening rates varied (29.9-62.9%). Among states, mandated perinatal depression screening or training was positively associated with IPV screening. 3.6% of women in our sample reported prenatal IPV but were not screened during pregnancy. Conclusions for Practice Current efforts have not led to universal screening. We need to better understand when and why providers do not screen pregnant patients for IPV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intimate partner violence; Prenatal care; Screening; State policy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30600519      PMCID: PMC7008966          DOI: 10.1007/s10995-018-2692-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  5 in total

1.  Computerized intervention for reducing intimate partner victimization for perinatal women seeking mental health treatment: A multisite randomized clinical trial protocol.

Authors:  Dawn M Johnson; Golfo Tzilos Wernette; Ted R Miller; Maria Muzik; Christina A Raker; Caron Zlotnick
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Homicide During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period in the United States, 2018-2019.

Authors:  Maeve Wallace; Veronica Gillispie-Bell; Kiara Cruz; Kelly Davis; Dovile Vilda
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 7.623

3.  Factors Influencing Provider Behavior Around Delivery of Preconception Care.

Authors:  Erin C Nacev; Madelyne Z Greene; Mireya P Taboada; Deborah B Ehrenthal
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2022-04-18

Review 4.  Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence in Pregnancy: An Umbrella Review.

Authors:  Rosario M Román-Gálvez; Sandra Martín-Peláez; Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano; Khalid Saeed Khan; Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Integrative review of the literature on screening for gender-based violence during pregnancy: Barriers, facilitators, and tools.

Authors:  Laura Andreu-Pejó; Ma Jesús Valero-Chillerón; Víctor Manuel González-Chordá; Desirée Mena Tudela; Agueda Cervera Gasch
Journal:  Nurs Health Sci       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 2.214

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.