Literature DB >> 30600436

Radiologists' recommendations for additional imaging (RAI) in the inpatient setting.

Ettore Squillaci1, Francesca Bolacchi2, Francesca Ricci2, Vincenzo De Stasio2, Luca Pugliese2, Arezia Di Martino2, Roberto Floris2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to measure the rate of radiologists' additional recommended imaging examinations (RAI) at a hospital-based inpatient setting and to estimate the influence on RAI of clinical variables.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. Inpatients CT and US examinations interpreted by fifteen radiologists between October and December 2016 were studied. Information about RAI from radiology report texts was extracted manually. The analytic data set included the interpreting radiologists' years of experience, patient age, patient gender, radiologist gender, ordering service and "clinical question to be answered" as collected from the radiology request forms.
RESULTS: Of the 1996 US and CT examinations performed between October and December 2016 in the inpatient setting, 34% (683 examinations) had a radiologists' RAI. The largest proportion of RAI was for chest CT, followed by PET-CT, abdominal CT and abdominal MRI. Patient age and gender had no impact on RAI. Radiologists' years of experience were inversely correlated to RAI. "Pneumonia" showed the highest rate of RAI due to follow-up of lung nodules.
CONCLUSION: A high percentage of RAI resulted from CT and US radiologists' reports. The largest proportion of RAI was for chest CT, followed by PET-CT, abdominal CT, and abdominal MRI. Radiologists' years of experience play an important role in the number of the requested RAI. Further studies with a larger cohort of radiologists are needed to confirm the role of radiologists' experience in RAI. Also, follow-up studies are warranted to assess the number of RAI that are actually acted upon by the referring physicians.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; Inpatient setting; MRI; PET-CT; Radiology reporting; Recommendation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30600436     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-018-0982-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  2 in total

1.  Whole-body computed tomography: a new point of view in a hospital check-up unit? Our experience in 6516 patients.

Authors:  Maite Millor; Pablo Bartolomé; Maria José Pons; Gorka Bastarrika; Óscar Beloqui; David Cano; Ignacio González; Isabel Vivas
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Current Standards for and Clinical Impact of Emergency Radiology in Major Trauma.

Authors:  Francesca Iacobellis; Ahmad Abu-Omar; Paola Crivelli; Michele Galluzzo; Roberta Danzi; Margherita Trinci; Giuseppina Dell'Aversano Orabona; Maurizio Conti; Luigia Romano; Mariano Scaglione
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.