Literature DB >> 30600272

Neonatologists' Attitudes About Diagnostic Whole-Genome Sequencing in the NICU.

Brett Knapp1, Carole Decker2, John D Lantos3.   

Abstract

Using focus group methodology, we studied the attitudes of neonatologists regarding diagnostic rapid genome sequencing for newborns who were critically ill in a NICU. One focus group took place within the first year after whole-genome sequencing testing became available, and another focus group took place 3 years later. Focus groups were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed by using standard techniques of grounded theory. Different analysts coded them for themes. The analysts then discussed differences and agreed on major themes. Twelve doctors participated in the first focus group, and 9 doctors participated in the second; 62% were attending physicians, and the rest were fellows. There were 14 women and 7 men. We did not collect any other demographic information on participants. Surprisingly, we found few differences between the earlier focus group and the later one. Comments were categorized as falling into 4 domains: (1) uncertainty about the interpretation of results, (2) issues about parental consent and limits on their right to know genomic information, (3) different opinions about whether and how genomic results could be clinically useful, and (4) potential harms of genomic testing.
Copyright © 2019 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30600272     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-1099J

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  7 in total

1.  Influence of Genetic Information on Neonatologists' Decisions: A Psychological Experiment.

Authors:  Katharine Press Callahan; John Flibotte; Cara Skraban; Katherine Taylor Wild; Steven Joffe; David Munson; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  A Prospective Study of Parental Perceptions of Rapid Whole-Genome and -Exome Sequencing among Seriously Ill Infants.

Authors:  Julie A Cakici; David P Dimmock; Sara A Caylor; Mary Gaughran; Christina Clarke; Cynthia Triplett; Michelle M Clark; Stephen F Kingsmore; Cinnamon S Bloss
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Preparing Medical Specialists to Practice Genomic Medicine: Education an Essential Part of a Broader Strategy.

Authors:  Erin Crellin; Belinda McClaren; Amy Nisselle; Stephanie Best; Clara Gaff; Sylvia Metcalfe
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Measures of Utility Among Studies of Genomic Medicine for Critically Ill Infants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Katharine Press Callahan; Rebecca Mueller; John Flibotte; Emily A Largent; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-08-01

5.  An RCT of Rapid Genomic Sequencing among Seriously Ill Infants Results in High Clinical Utility, Changes in Management, and Low Perceived Harm.

Authors:  David P Dimmock; Michelle M Clark; Mary Gaughran; Julie A Cakici; Sara A Caylor; Christina Clarke; Michele Feddock; Shimul Chowdhury; Lisa Salz; Cynthia Cheung; Lynne M Bird; Charlotte Hobbs; Kristen Wigby; Lauge Farnaes; Cinnamon S Bloss; Stephen F Kingsmore
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 11.043

6.  Education and Training of Non-Genetics Providers on the Return of Genome Sequencing Results in a NICU Setting.

Authors:  Kelly M East; Meagan E Cochran; Whitley V Kelley; Veronica Greve; Candice R Finnila; Tanner Coleman; Mikayla Jennings; Latonya Alexander; Elizabeth J Rahn; Maria I Danila; Greg Barsh; Bruce Korf; Greg Cooper
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-03-05

7.  Healthcare Professionals' Attitudes toward Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing in Pediatric Acute Care.

Authors:  Linda S Franck; Andrea Scheurer-Monaghan; Caleb P Bupp; Joseph D Fakhoury; Thomas J Hoffmann; Manasi Deshpandey; Madison Arenchild; David P Dimmock
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.