Grigory Karmazanovsky1, Elena Belousova2, Wolfgang Schima3, Andrei Glotov4, Dmitry Kalinin4, Andrei Kriger5. 1. Department of Radiology, A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, Moscow, Russia; Department of Radiology, Faculty of Postgraduate Professional Training of Physicians, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia. 2. Department of Radiology, A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, Moscow, Russia; Department of Radiology, Faculty of Postgraduate Professional Training of Physicians, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia. Electronic address: dr.elena.belousova@gmail.com. 3. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goettlicher Heiland Krankenhaus, Barmherzige Schwestern Krankenhaus, and Sankt Josef Krankenhaus, Vinzenzgruppe, Vienna, Austria. 4. Department of Pathology, A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, Moscow, Russia. 5. Department of Abdominal Surgery, A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, Moscow, Russia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to determine contrast-enhanced MDCT features to differentiate nonhypervascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). METHODS: and materials: We included 74 patients with PNETs and 80 patients with PDACs who underwent preoperative MDCT. Two radiologists evaluated the morphologic characteristic and enhancement patterns of the tumors. Quantitative and qualitative analysis was performed, including evaluation of tumor size, homogeneity, contrast enhancement pattern, presence of pancreatic duct dilatation and tumor invasion to the adjacent vessels and peripancreatic infiltration. Tumor-to-pancreas enhancement ratio was defined as the Hounsfield units (HU) value of the tumor divided by the HU value of the pancreas. the first group was hypervascular PNETs showing hyperenhancement on arterial phase images and nonhypervascular PNETs, showing iso- or hypoenhancement on arterial phase images. After that, two radiologists estimated the possibilities of PNET or PDAC were for nonhypervascular PNETs. RESULTS: On the basis of arterial enhancement, 43 PNETs were hypervascular and 31 were nonhypervascular. When compared to PDAC, nonhypervascular PNETs more frequently had well-defined tumor margins, intratumoral cystic components, calcifications and blood vessels and less frequently had main pancreatic duct dilatation, peripancreatic infiltration and vascular invasion (p < 0.01 for all). Nonhypervascular PNETs had higher tumor-to-pancreas enhancement ratio in venous phase (1.02 vs. 0.78, p = 0.012). Nonhypervascular PNETs more often had portal-venous hyperenhancement or persistent isoenhancement, while PDAC more often had persistent hypoenhancement or gradual delayed enhancement (p < 0.001). The absence of pancreatic duct dilatation and portal-venous hyperenhancement or persistent isoenhancement were the independent predictors for nonhypervascular PNETs. (The most accurate MDCT-findings to predict nonhypervascular PNET were the absence of pancreatic duct dilatation and peripancreatic infiltration (79% and 92% accuracy), portal-venous phase hyperenhancement or persistent isoenhancement (77%), the presence of intratumoral blood vessels (77%) and relative enhancement intensity in venous phase >0.9 (76%). Using these criteria, the area under curve for differentiation of PNET from PDAC was 0.906-0.846. CONCLUSION: Combined assessment of the enhancement and morphologic characteristics can improve the differentiation between nonhypervascular PNETs and PDAC at contrast-enhanced MDCT.
PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to determine contrast-enhanced MDCT features to differentiate nonhypervascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). METHODS: and materials: We included 74 patients with PNETs and 80 patients with PDACs who underwent preoperative MDCT. Two radiologists evaluated the morphologic characteristic and enhancement patterns of the tumors. Quantitative and qualitative analysis was performed, including evaluation of tumor size, homogeneity, contrast enhancement pattern, presence of pancreatic duct dilatation and tumor invasion to the adjacent vessels and peripancreatic infiltration. Tumor-to-pancreas enhancement ratio was defined as the Hounsfield units (HU) value of the tumor divided by the HU value of the pancreas. the first group was hypervascular PNETs showing hyperenhancement on arterial phase images and nonhypervascular PNETs, showing iso- or hypoenhancement on arterial phase images. After that, two radiologists estimated the possibilities of PNET or PDAC were for nonhypervascular PNETs. RESULTS: On the basis of arterial enhancement, 43 PNETs were hypervascular and 31 were nonhypervascular. When compared to PDAC, nonhypervascular PNETs more frequently had well-defined tumor margins, intratumoral cystic components, calcifications and blood vessels and less frequently had main pancreatic duct dilatation, peripancreatic infiltration and vascular invasion (p < 0.01 for all). Nonhypervascular PNETs had higher tumor-to-pancreas enhancement ratio in venous phase (1.02 vs. 0.78, p = 0.012). Nonhypervascular PNETs more often had portal-venous hyperenhancement or persistent isoenhancement, while PDAC more often had persistent hypoenhancement or gradual delayed enhancement (p < 0.001). The absence of pancreatic duct dilatation and portal-venous hyperenhancement or persistent isoenhancement were the independent predictors for nonhypervascular PNETs. (The most accurate MDCT-findings to predict nonhypervascular PNET were the absence of pancreatic duct dilatation and peripancreatic infiltration (79% and 92% accuracy), portal-venous phase hyperenhancement or persistent isoenhancement (77%), the presence of intratumoral blood vessels (77%) and relative enhancement intensity in venous phase >0.9 (76%). Using these criteria, the area under curve for differentiation of PNET from PDAC was 0.906-0.846. CONCLUSION: Combined assessment of the enhancement and morphologic characteristics can improve the differentiation between nonhypervascular PNETs and PDAC at contrast-enhanced MDCT.
Authors: Jiake Xu; Jie Yang; Ye Feng; Jie Zhang; Yuqiao Zhang; Sha Chang; Jingqiang Jin; Xia Du Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-05-19 Impact factor: 5.738