Ichiro Yamada1, Junichiro Sakamoto2, Daisuke Kobayashi3, Naoyuki Miyasaka4, Kimio Wakana4, Noriko Oshima4, Akira Wakabayashi4, Yukihisa Saida5, Ukihide Tateishi5, Yoshinobu Eishi3. 1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: yamada.crad@tmd.ac.jp. 2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. 3. Department of Human Pathology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. 4. Department of Comprehensive Reproductive Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. 5. Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to determine the usefulness of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) as a noninvasive method for the evaluation of tumor invasion depth, histological grade, and lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial carcinoma (EMC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waived informed consent. In total, 24 patients suspected of having EMC were examined by a 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging. DKI data were obtained using a single-shot echo-planar imaging sequence with four b values (0, 500, 1000, and 2000 s/mm2). Kurtosis (K), diffusivity (D), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were generated and compared with histopathological findings. RESULTS: K maps from all patients identified the junctional zone as a distinct high-K zone (1.443 ± 0.362). This zone was significantly different from the zone of endometrium and outer myometrium (0.678 ± 0.179 and 0.694 ± 0.113, respectively; P < 0.001). K and D values of all EMCs were significantly different from those of all normal uterine wall layers. K and D values were significantly correlated with histological grades of endometrioid adenocarcinomas (r = 0.799, P < 0.001 and r = -0.799, P < 0.001, respectively), while ADC values were not (r = -0.243, P = 0.382). Metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes showed significantly different K (P = 0.001) and D (P = 0.001) values, but not ADC values (P = 0.827). CONCLUSIONS: DKI may be clinically useful for the noninvasive evaluation of depth of tumor invasion, histological grade, and lymph node metastasis in patients with EMC.
PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to determine the usefulness of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) as a noninvasive method for the evaluation of tumor invasion depth, histological grade, and lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial carcinoma (EMC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waived informed consent. In total, 24 patients suspected of having EMC were examined by a 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging. DKI data were obtained using a single-shot echo-planar imaging sequence with four b values (0, 500, 1000, and 2000 s/mm2). Kurtosis (K), diffusivity (D), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were generated and compared with histopathological findings. RESULTS: K maps from all patients identified the junctional zone as a distinct high-K zone (1.443 ± 0.362). This zone was significantly different from the zone of endometrium and outer myometrium (0.678 ± 0.179 and 0.694 ± 0.113, respectively; P < 0.001). K and D values of all EMCs were significantly different from those of all normal uterine wall layers. K and D values were significantly correlated with histological grades of endometrioid adenocarcinomas (r = 0.799, P < 0.001 and r = -0.799, P < 0.001, respectively), while ADC values were not (r = -0.243, P = 0.382). Metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes showed significantly different K (P = 0.001) and D (P = 0.001) values, but not ADC values (P = 0.827). CONCLUSIONS: DKI may be clinically useful for the noninvasive evaluation of depth of tumor invasion, histological grade, and lymph node metastasis in patients with EMC.