Literature DB >> 30597640

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Breast Masses: Adjunct Tool to Decrease the Number of False-Positive Biopsy Results.

Sandy C Lee1, Hisham Tchelepi1, Edward Grant1, Bhushan Desai1, Chunqiao Luo2, Susan Groshen2, Linda Hovanessian-Larsen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This pilot study evaluated use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to reduce the number of benign breast masses recommended for biopsy.
METHODS: This prospective study included 131 consenting women, from October 2016 to June 2017, with American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4a, 4b, and 4c masses detected by mammography, conventional ultrasound (US), or both. Contrast-enhanced US examinations (using intravenous injection of perflutren lipid microspheres or sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres) were performed before biopsy. Qualitative and quantitative CEUS parameters were compared with reference standard histopathologic results from biopsy of 131 masses.
RESULTS: There were 109 benign, 6 high-risk, and 16 malignant masses, with a median size of 12 mm (range, 4 to 48 mm) on conventional US imaging. Of 131 masses, 93 (71%) enhanced on CEUS imaging, including 73 of 109 (67%) benign, 6 of 6 (100%) high-risk, and 14 of 16 (87.5%) malignant. Thirty-eight lesions did not enhance, including 36 of 109 (33%) benign and 2 of 16 (12.5%) malignant. Prediction models using recursive petitioning revealed that CEUS may reduce 31% (95% confidence interval, 23%, 40%) of benign biopsies for masses that are: nonenhancing with circumscribed margins or enhancing with an oval shape and homogeneous enhancement. Quantitative parameters indicated that benign masses had the longest time to peak (P = .078), highest time-to-peak ratio of mass to background (P = .036), lowest peak intensity (P = .021), and smallest difference in peak intensity between the mass and background (P = .079) compared to high-risk and malignant lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced US may be a valuable modality that can be used to predict benign pathologic results of breast masses, thereby reducing the number of biopsies.
© 2018 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4; biopsy; breast mass; contrast-enhanced ultrasound; ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30597640      PMCID: PMC7735954          DOI: 10.1002/jum.14917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  9 in total

Review 1.  BI-RADS 3 on Screening Breast Ultrasound: What Is It and What Is the Appropriate Management?

Authors:  Wendie A Berg
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2021-08-15

2.  Ultrasound high-definition microvasculature imaging with novel quantitative biomarkers improves breast cancer detection accuracy.

Authors:  Redouane Ternifi; Yinong Wang; Juanjuan Gu; Eric C Polley; Jodi M Carter; Sandhya Pruthi; Judy C Boughey; Robert T Fazzio; Mostafa Fatemi; Azra Alizad
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 7.034

3.  Correlation analysis between rim enhancement features of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Yanling Guo; Qingfei Song; Qiaohong Pan
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 4.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound perfusion imaging of organs.

Authors:  Ernst-Michael Jung; Marc-André Weber; Isabel Wiesinger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Characterizing breast masses using an integrative framework of machine learning and CEUS-based radiomics.

Authors:  Bino A Varghese; Sandy Lee; Steven Cen; Amir Talebi; Passant Mohd; Daniel Stahl; Melissa Perkins; Bhushan Desai; Vinay A Duddalwar; Linda H Larsen
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2022-01-17

6.  Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of breast BI-RADS 3-5 lesions.

Authors:  Eva Janu; Lucie Krikavova; Jirina Little; Karel Dvorak; Dagmar Brancikova; Eva Jandakova; Tomas Pavlik; Petra Kovalcikova; Tomas Kazda; Vlastimil Valek
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Optimal treatment occasion for ultrasound stimulated microbubbles in promoting gemcitabine delivery to VX2 tumors.

Authors:  Tingting Luo; Luhua Bai; Yi Zhang; Leidan Huang; Hui Li; Shunji Gao; Xiaoxiao Dong; Ningshan Li; Zheng Liu
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 6.819

8.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of granular cell tumor in breast: A case report with review of the literature.

Authors:  Huanyu Wang; Duo Feng; Tianhui Zou; Yao Liu; Xiaoqin Wu; Jiawei Zou; Rong Huang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 5.738

9.  The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of malignant non-mass breast lesions and exploration of diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Lifang Jin; Gang Li; Chao Jia; Qiusheng Shi; Lianfang Du; Rong Wu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.039

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.