Literature DB >> 30597189

Error-related pupil dilation is sensitive to the evaluation of different error types.

Martin E Maier1, Benjamin Ernst2, Marco Steinhauser2.   

Abstract

Adjusting behavior following errors is essential for successful goal-directed performance. Error-related pupil dilation indicates increased autonomic arousal and has been shown to predict adaptive adjustments of post-error behavior. Because different types of errors may require different behavioral adjustments, we investigated whether this process is also sensitive to the evaluation of different types of errors. We used a four-choice flanker task where errors occur either by pressing a button associated with the distractors (flanker errors), or by pressing a button not associated with the stimulus at all (nonflanker errors). Flanker errors imply suboptimal selective attention to the target and are therefore of increased significance for successful performance. Pupil dilation was larger for flanker errors than nonflanker errors, and only pupil dilation on flanker errors predicted a decrease of error probability on the next trial. Moreover, the error-related negativity, an electrophysiological marker of early error monitoring in the medial frontal cortex, was larger on flanker errors anticipating the effect of error type on pupil dilation. These results show that error-related pupil dilation is sensitive to the type and significance of errors and correlates with adaptive behavioral adjustments accordingly. This suggests that mechanisms underlying error-related pupil dilation receive inputs from error evaluation mechanisms in the medial frontal cortex.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Error monitoring; Error-related negativity; Flanker task; Pupil

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30597189     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  4 in total

1.  Pupil Dilation and the Slow Wave ERP Reflect Surprise about Choice Outcome Resulting from Intrinsic Variability in Decision Confidence.

Authors:  Jan Willem de Gee; Camile M C Correa; Matthew Weaver; Tobias H Donner; Simon van Gaal
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Component processes in free-viewing visual search: Insights from fixation-aligned pupillary response averaging.

Authors:  Joel T Martin; Annalise H Whittaker; Stephen J Johnston
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Effect of an Educational Intervention on Therapeutic Inertia in Neurologists With Expertise in Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Gustavo Saposnik; Marcus Grueschow; Jiwon Oh; Maria A Terzaghi; Pawel Kostyrko; Shruthi Vaidyanathan; Rosane Nisenbaum; Christian C Ruff; Philippe N Tobler
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-12-01

4.  Pupillometry tracks errors in interval timing.

Authors:  Shamini Warda; Jaana Simola; Devin B Terhune
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 2.154

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.