Literature DB >> 30597057

Office-Based Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Disease: A Systematic Review of Recent Human Studies.

Luke Law1, Christine L Hunt2, Andre J van Wijnen3,4, Ahmad Nassr3, A Noelle Larson3, Jason S Eldrige5, William D Mauck5, Mathew J Pingree2,5, Juan Yang2,5, Casey W Muir2, Patricia J Erwin6, Mohamad Bydon7, Wenchun Qu2,5,8.   

Abstract

Background: The use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in clinical applications for the treatment of musculoskeletal disease is steadily increasing in office-based practice. The so-called "first generation" of MSCs is defined as autologous stem cells that have undergone minimal manipulation and are used for a homologous purpose. Systematic reviews of the clinical trials completed to date of such MSCs enable practitioners to better understand what is currently known about the outcomes and side effects of such treatments. Study Design: A systematic review of human clinical studies of office-based MSC therapy for the treatment of painful degenerative musculoskeletal conditions.
Methods: A search of the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases was conducted from 2006 through September 2016. Seven hundred sixty-one records were identified from database searching, and two records from reference review of included papers. Studies with human subjects that evaluated treatment of musculoskeletal disease with minimally manipulated MSCs were included.
Results: Eight studies were included in this review based on selection criteria. A total of 941 patients were included, 841 of whom received cellular products, and no significant adverse events were reported. Symptomatology generally improved, though no differences were seen over controls where present.
Conclusion: Support in the literature is strongest for the use of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) injections for the treatment of knee pain, but applications of the use of BMAC and peripheral blood-derived MSCs for the treatment of hip pain, tendon pain, and disc pain have all been reported. Further research is required, with large randomized controlled trials.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30597057     DOI: 10.1093/pm/pny256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  4 in total

1.  Ex vivo gene therapy using human bone marrow cells overexpressing BMP-2: "Next-day" gene therapy versus standard "two-step" approach.

Authors:  Sofia Bougioukli; Ram Alluri; William Pannell; Osamu Sugiyama; Andrew Vega; Amy Tang; Tautis Skorka; Sang Hyun Park; Daniel Oakes; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  The Cost Variability of Orthobiologics.

Authors:  Amit Mukesh Momaya; Andrew Sullivan McGee; Alexander R Dombrowsky; Alan Joshua Wild; Naqeeb M Faroqui; Raymond P Waldrop; Jun Kit He; Eugene W Brabston; Brent Andrew Ponce
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 3.  Notochordal Cell-Based Treatment Strategies and Their Potential in Intervertebral Disc Regeneration.

Authors:  Frances C Bach; Deepani W Poramba-Liyanage; Frank M Riemers; Jerome Guicheux; Anne Camus; James C Iatridis; Danny Chan; Keita Ito; Christine L Le Maitre; Marianna A Tryfonidou
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-03-14

4.  Continuous Electrical Stimulation Affects Initial Growth and Proliferation of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.

Authors:  Peer W Kämmerer; Vivien Engel; Franz Plocksties; Anika Jonitz-Heincke; Dirk Timmermann; Nadja Engel; Bernhard Frerich; Rainer Bader; Daniel G E Thiem; Anna Skorska; Robert David; Bilal Al-Nawas; Michael Dau
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2020-11-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.