| Literature DB >> 30596023 |
Phob Ganokroj1, Trakul Polklaew2, Pisit Lertwanich1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/Entities:
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Anteroposterior knee radiograph; Bone-patellar tendon-bone graft; Graft-tunnel length mismatch; Patellar tendon length; Radiographic measurement
Year: 2018 PMID: 30596023 PMCID: PMC6305767 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmart.2018.12.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol ISSN: 2214-6873
Fig. 1Measurements were performed on an antero-posterior radiograph of the knee. A) Patella-to-condyle distance was the distance between a line draw at a tangent to the most convex point of both femoral condyles (line C), and a parallel line at the inferior pole of the patella (line P). B) Patella-to-notch distance was the distance between the apex of the femoral notch (line N) and a line at the inferior pole of the patella.
Demographic data.
| Variables | All (n = 127) | Group I Patellar tendon > 45 mm (n = 20) | Group II Patellar tendon ≤ 45 mm (n = 107) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 29.5 ± 8.8 | 27.5 ± 7.6 | 29.9 ± 9.1 | 0.26 |
| Sex (n, %) | ||||
| Male | 121 (95%) | 20 (100%) | 101 (94%) | 0.59 |
| Female | 6 (5%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (6%) | |
| Weight (kg) | 72.5 ± 12.7 | 71.6 ± 11.9 | 72.6 ± 12.8 | 0.75 |
| Height (cm) | 170.7 ± 7.2 | 172.7 ± 5.6 | 170.3 ± 7.4 | 0.17 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.3 (17.5–36.8) | 22.8 (19.8–31.6) | 24.3 (17.5–36.8) | 0.22 |
| Side (n, %) | ||||
| Left | 69 (54%) | 9 (45%) | 60 (56%) | 0.47 |
| Right | 58 (46%) | 11 (55%) | 47 (44%) | |
Patellar tendon length, two radiographic measurements, and types of tibial fixation of the patients.
| Variables | All (n = 127) | Group I Patellar tendon > 45 mm (n = 20) | Group II Patellar tendon ≤ 45 mm (n = 107) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patellar tendon length (cm) | 41.3 ± 5.0 | 49.5 ± 2.7 | 39.7 ± 3.6 | <0.01* |
| Radiographic measurements | ||||
| Patella-to-condyle (mm) | 13.2 ± 6.6 | 18.7 ± 6.9 | 12.1 ± 6.0 | <0.01* |
| Patella-to-notch (mm) | 3.8 ± 7.2 | 8.6 ± 7.7 | 2.9 ± 6.7 | <0.01* |
| Tibial fixation (n, %) | ||||
| Interference screw | 108 (85%) | 10 (50%) | 98 (92%) | <0.01* |
| Bone staple | 19 (15%) | 10 (50%) | 9 (8%) | |
* Statistically significant difference between the two groups with p-value less than 0.05.
Sensitivities and specificities of different cutoff points.
| Distance (mm) | Sensitivity (%) (95% CI) | Specificity (%) (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Patella-to-condyle distance | ||
| 13.5 | 80.0 (56.3–94.3) | 62.6 (52.7–71.8) |
| 14.0 | 80.0 (56.3–94.3) | 67.3 (57.5–76.0) |
| 14.5# | 80.0 (56.3–94.3) | 71.0 (61.5–79.4) |
| 15.0 | 70.0 (45.7–88.1) | 72.9 (63.4–81.0) |
| 15.5 | 65.0 (40.8–84.6) | 73.8 (64.4–81.9) |
| Patella-to-notch distance | ||
| 4.5 | 85.0 (62.1–96.8) | 60.7 (50.8–70.0) |
| 5.0 | 80.0 (56.3–94.3) | 62.6 (52.7–71.8) |
| 5.5# | 80.0 (56.3–94.3) | 66.4 (56.6–75.2) |
| 6.0 | 70.0 (45.7–88.1) | 68.2 (58.5–76.9) |
| 6.5 | 65.0 (40.8–84.6) | 69.2 (59.5–77.7) |
# The optimal cutoff point with the highest Youden index.
Predictive values, likelihood ratios, and area under the curve of different cutoff points.
| Distance (mm) | PPV (95%CI) | NPV (95%CI) | LR+ (95%CI) | LR- (95%CI) | AUC (95%CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patella-to-condyle distance | |||||
| 13.5 | 28.6 (17.3–42.2) | 94.4 (86.2–98.4) | 2.1 (1.5–2.9) | 0.3 (0.1–0.8) | 0.7 (0.6–0.8) |
| 14.0 | 31.4 (19.1–45.9) | 94.7 (87.1–98.5) | 2.5 (1.7–3.5) | 0.3 (0.1–0.7) | 0.7 (0.6–0.8) |
| 14.5# | 34 (20.9–49.3) | 95 (87.7–98.6) | 2.8 (1.9–4.0) | 0.3 (0.1–0.7) | 0.8 (0.7–0.8) |
| 15.0 | 32.6 (19.1–48.5) | 92.9 (85.1–97.3) | 2.6 (1.7–3.9) | 0.4 (0.2–0.8) | 0.7 (0.6–0.8) |
| 15.5 | 31.7 (18.1–48.1) | 91.9 (83.9–96.7) | 2.5 (1.6–3.9) | 0.5 (0.3–0.8) | 0.1 (0.6–0.8) |
| Patella-to-notch distance | |||||
| 4.5 | 28.8 (17.8–42.1) | 95.6 (87.6–99.1) | 2.2 (1.6–2.9) | 0.3 (0.1–0.7) | 0.7 (0.6–0.8) |
| 5.0 | 28.6 (17.3–42.2) | 94.4 (86.2–98.4) | 2.1 (1.5–3.0) | 0.3 (0.1–0.8) | 0.7 (0.6–0.8) |
| 5.5# | 30.8 (18.7–45.1) | 94.7 (86.9–98.5) | 2.4 (1.7–3.4) | 0.3 (0.1–0.7) | 0.7 (0.6–0.8) |
| 6.0 | 29.2 (17.0–44.1) | 92.4 (84.2–97.2) | 2.2 (1.5–3.3) | 0.4 (0.2–0.9) | 0.7 (0.6–0.8) |
| 6.5 | 28.3 (16.0–43.5) | 91.4 (83.0–96.5) | 2.1 (1.4–3.2) | 0.5 (0.3–0.9) | 0.7 (0.5–0.8) |
# The optimal cutoff points with the highest Youden index and area under the curve.
Positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-) and area under the curve (AUC).
Fig. 2The ROC curve of the patella-to-condyle distance was obtained after empirical estimation. The area under the curve was 0.76 (0.66–0.85), which represents an acceptable level of discrimination capability.
Fig. 3The ROC curve of the patella-to-notch distance was obtained after empirical estimation. The area under the curve was 0.73 (0.63–0.83), which signifies an acceptable level of discrimination capability.
The intra- and interrater reliabilities of the patella-to-condyle and the patella-to-notch distance measurements.
| ICC (95%CI) | SEM (mm) | LOA (mm) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intra-rater reliability | |||
| Patella-to-condyle distance | 0.98 (0.97, 0.99) | 0.92 | −2.8 to 2.3 |
| Patella-to-notch distance | 0.98 (0.97, 0.99) | 0.89 | −2.5 to 2.4 |
| Inter-rater reliability | |||
| Patella-to-condyle distance | 0.96 (0.94, 0.98) | 1.24 | −3.2 to 3.6 |
| Patella-to-notch distance | 0.95 (0.92, 0.97) | 1.51 | −3.2 to 4.6 |
ICC intraclass correlation coefficients, SEM standard error of measurement, and.
LOA limit of agreements.
Fig. 4Bland–Altman plots of the patella-to-condyle distance measurement demonstrated differences between the 2 observers, plotted against the mean value of both observers for each patient.
Fig. 5Bland–Altman plots of the patella-to-notch distance measurement demonstrated differences between the 2 observers, plotted against the mean value of both observers for each patient.