| Literature DB >> 30595912 |
Jinfei Tang1, Ergang Du1, Xingyu Li1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To characterize new combined surgical techniques for the management of malignant glaucoma.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30595912 PMCID: PMC6282139 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9189585
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ophthalmol ISSN: 2090-004X Impact factor: 1.909
Preoperative and postoperative summary of the 9 eyes.
| Patient number | Age (year) | Sex | Eye | Axial length (mm) | History | BCVA | IOP (mmHg) | Anterior chamber depth (mm) | Medications | Follow-up (months) | Complications | Recurrence | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-op | Post-op | Pre-op | Post-op | Pre-op | Post-op | Pre-op | Post-op | |||||||||
| 1 | 82 | M | R | 20.41 | LPI, P | 20/60 | 20/60 | 28 | 17 | 2.14 | 3.05 | a, b | 0 | 12 | No | No |
| 82 | M | L | 20.50 | LPI | 20/200 | 20/40 | 18 | 13 | 1.55 | 3.16 | 0 | 0 | 12 | No | No | |
| 2 | 42 | F | L | 21.71 | PACG, T | 20/40 | 20/25 | 38 | 13 | 2.30 | 2.92 | a, b, c | 0 | 9 | No | No |
| 42 | F | R | 21.82 | PACG | LP | HM | 43 | 20 | 2.00 | 2.80 | b, c | 0 | 9 | No | No | |
| 3 | 71 | F | L | 20.58 | PACG, P, T | 20/80 | 20/80 | 21 | 17 | 2.03 | 3.07 | a, b | 0 | 10 | No | No |
| 71 | F | R | 20.55 | PACG, P | 20/40 | 20/30 | 23 | 12 | 1.50 | 3.21 | a, b | 0 | 10 | No | No | |
| 4 | 60 | M | R | 22.87 | P | 20/200 | 20/200 | 31 | 22 | 2.30 | 2.86 | a, b | b | 3 | No | No |
| 5 | 59 | F | L | 21.49 | P | 20/200 | 20/30 | 46 | 18 | 1.68 | 3.20 | a, b | 0 | 3 | No | No |
| 6 | 65 | F | R | 22.44 | Narrow angle, LPI, P | 20/30 | 20/30 | 25 | 15 | 1.83 | 2.94 | a | 0 | 6 | No | No |
M, male; F, female; P, phaco; T, trabeculectomy; PACG, primary angle closure glaucoma; R, right; L, left; LPI, laser peripheral iridotomy; HM, hand movement; LP, light perception. a = mydriatics and cyloplegics; b = topical antiglaucoma medications; c = oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitors.
Figure 1Photographs of our surgical procedure: (a) goniosynechialysis under direct visualization by the intraoperative gonioscopy. (b) Peripheral iridectomy via the anterior chamber using a vitreous cutter. (c) Zonulo-hyaloidectomy under direct vision facilitated by the enlargement of the peripheral iris opening. (d) Anterior vitrectomy. (e) Anterior chamber liquid and viscoelastic drainage and observation of rapid deepening of the anterior chamber. (f) Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation if the patient was initially phakic.
Figure 2Fundus photography showing the cup/disc was about 1.0 of the right eye (a) and 0.9 of the left eye (b).
Figure 3(a) Slit-lamp examination showing the left eyelid was swollen and hyperemic, with mixed congestion of the conjunctiva with a shallow anterior chamber and light cataract. The pupil diameter was approximately 7 mm before surgery. (b) Slit-lamp image showing the reduced eyelid congestion and edema, reduced conjunctiva congestion, and pupil diameter of 3 mm after surgery.
Figure 4(a) Ultrasound biomicroscopy demonstrating peripheral anterior synechiae to the trabecular meshwork and a flat iris contour without pupillary block. (b) Ultrasound biomicroscopy demonstrating separation of the peripheral anterior synechiae and widening of the anterior chamber angle. The anterior chamber became deeper.
Figure 5(a) Slit-lamp examination showing a shallow anterior chamber and light cataract of the right eye prior to surgery. (b) Slit-lamp image showing a deep postoperative anterior chamber. The congestion of the eyelid and conjunctiva was improved.