Hikaru Nishiyama1, Yuki Tanabe1, Teruhito Kido2, Akira Kurata1, Teruyoshi Uetani3, Tomoyuki Kido1, Shuntaro Ikeda3, Masao Miyagawa1, Teruhito Mochizuki1. 1. Department of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon City, Ehime, Japan. 2. Department of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon City, Ehime, Japan. Electronic address: t.k.ehime@gmail.com. 3. Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology, Hypertension and Nephrology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon City, Ehime, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the incremental diagnostic value of dynamic myocardial computed tomography (CT) perfusion (CTP) imaging for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in comparison with coronary CT angiography (CTA). METHODS: Thirty-eight patients who had undergone coronary CTA and pharmacological stress dynamic CTP before invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were selected retrospectively. Using ICA, obstructive CAD was defined as the presence of severe (≥70%) or moderate (50-69%) stenosis with fractional flow reserve (FFR) <0.75. For CT evaluations, coronary vessels with any stenosis ≥50%, ≥70% or unassessable lesions were considered significantly stenotic. Dynamic CTP was assessed quantitatively using CT-derived myocardial blood flow (CT-MBF). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis determined the cut-off value of CT-MBF for identifying obstructive CAD. The diagnostic performances of CTA alone and integrated CTA and CTP assessments for detecting obstructive CAD were compared. RESULTS: Using ICA and FFR, 24 of 114 vessels had obstructive CAD. The cut-off value of CT-MBF for detecting obstructive CAD was 1.26mL/g/min. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) at the vessel level were 96%, 57%, 37%, and 98% for CTA, and 83%, 93%, 77%, and 95% for integrated CTA and CTP assessment using cut-off 50% stenosis on CTA, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and PPV and NPV at the vessel level were 79%, 69%, 40%, and 93% for CTA, and 71%, 97%, 85%, and 93% for integrated CTA and CTP assessment using cut-off 70% stenosis on CTA, respectively. The area under the ROC curve for CTA and CTP was significantly higher than that for CTA alone (0.96 vs. 0.84, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Stress dynamic myocardial CTP is feasible to detect hemodynamically obstructive CAD in patients with high pre-test likelihood and helps for improving diagnostic performance in comparison with coronary CTA alone.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the incremental diagnostic value of dynamic myocardial computed tomography (CT) perfusion (CTP) imaging for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in comparison with coronary CT angiography (CTA). METHODS: Thirty-eight patients who had undergone coronary CTA and pharmacological stress dynamic CTP before invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were selected retrospectively. Using ICA, obstructive CAD was defined as the presence of severe (≥70%) or moderate (50-69%) stenosis with fractional flow reserve (FFR) <0.75. For CT evaluations, coronary vessels with any stenosis ≥50%, ≥70% or unassessable lesions were considered significantly stenotic. Dynamic CTP was assessed quantitatively using CT-derived myocardial blood flow (CT-MBF). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis determined the cut-off value of CT-MBF for identifying obstructive CAD. The diagnostic performances of CTA alone and integrated CTA and CTP assessments for detecting obstructive CAD were compared. RESULTS: Using ICA and FFR, 24 of 114 vessels had obstructive CAD. The cut-off value of CT-MBF for detecting obstructive CAD was 1.26mL/g/min. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) at the vessel level were 96%, 57%, 37%, and 98% for CTA, and 83%, 93%, 77%, and 95% for integrated CTA and CTP assessment using cut-off 50% stenosis on CTA, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and PPV and NPV at the vessel level were 79%, 69%, 40%, and 93% for CTA, and 71%, 97%, 85%, and 93% for integrated CTA and CTP assessment using cut-off 70% stenosis on CTA, respectively. The area under the ROC curve for CTA and CTP was significantly higher than that for CTA alone (0.96 vs. 0.84, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Stress dynamic myocardial CTP is feasible to detect hemodynamically obstructive CAD in patients with high pre-test likelihood and helps for improving diagnostic performance in comparison with coronary CTA alone.