| Literature DB >> 30595272 |
Ashwin B Mehta1, Nihar Mehta2, Rahul Chhabria3, Vivek Mandurke4, Nilesh Tawade5, Nikesh Jain6, Ajit Desai7, S R Handa8.
Abstract
We performed a retrospective analysis of 146 chronic total occlusion CTO patients to evaluate the antecedents of success and failure in CTO - Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in Indian patients. The study aimed to identify the technical success rate, analyse immediate patient outcomes, and understand the factors impacting the successful outcomes. Our results showed that J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry of Japan) scores correlate well with the success rates of CTO-PCI and two most important factors deciding failure are lesion length more than 20 mm and lesions with calcification. Most important step to success of CTO is wiring, once wire crosses the segment, success rates of the procedure is around 97%. The wire escalation strategy has to be modified once the initial soft (polymer) wire fails, it's reasonable to use high tip load wire like conquest pro without the use of intermediate wires (except in presence of tortuosity). At 1 year follow up of these patients, there was a statistically significant drop in angina class and major adverse cardiac event rates in the successful CTO group.Entities:
Keywords: CTO Success predictors
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30595272 PMCID: PMC6309151 DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.03.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian Heart J ISSN: 0019-4832
Baseline Patient Characteristics.
| Baseline and demographic characteristics | Successful PCI n = 105 | Unsuccessful PCI n = 41 | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Mean ± SD | 59.84 ± 10.86 | ||
| 58.65 ± 10.14 | 62.87 ± 12.12 | 0.0462 | |
| Gender, n (%) | 0.2685 | ||
| Male | 100 (95.2) | 37 (90.2) | |
| Female | 5 (4.8) | 4 (9.8) | |
| Medical History, n (%) | |||
| Diabetes mellitus | 50 (47.6) | 24 (58.5) | 0.234 |
| Hypertension | 61 (58.1) | 26 (63.4) | 0.555 |
| Smokers | 19 (18.1) | 4 (9.8) | 0.215 |
| Prior Coronary artery disease | 48 (45.7) | 24 (58.5) | 0.165 |
| CKD/RENAL DYSFUNCTION | 8 (7.6) | 2 (4.9) | 0.556 |
Lesion Characteristics.
| Parameter | Successful PCI n = 105 | Unsuccessful PCI n = 41 | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.53 | |||
| LAD | 40 (38.1) | 14 (34.2) | |
| LCX − OM | 24 (22.9) | 7 (17.1) | |
| RCA | 41 (39) | 20 (48.8) | |
| Single | 41 (39) | 13 (31.7) | |
| Multivessel | 64 (61) | 28 (68.3) | |
| Ipsilateral | 14 (13.3) | 4 (9.8) | |
| Contralateral | 81 (77.1) | 31 (75.6) | |
| Bridging | 10 (9.5) | 6 (14.6) | |
| 0.874 | |||
| ≤22 | 65 (61.9) | 23 (56.1) | |
| 23 to 32 | 25 (23.8) | 10 (24.4) | |
| ≥33 | 6 (5.7) | 3 (7.3) | |
| NA | 9 (8.6) | 5 (12.2) | |
| Mean: 2.14 ± 1.62 | <0.001 | ||
| 0 | 20 (19) | 1 (2.4) | |
| 1 | 37 (35.2) | 11 (26.8) | |
| 2 | 36 (34.3) | 17 (41.5) | |
| 3 | 12 (11.4) | 12 (29.3) | |
| 51 (48.6) | 30 (73.2) | <0.0001 | |
| 38 (36.2) | 28 (68.3) | <0.001 | |
| 4 (3.8) | 2 (4.9) | 0.77 | |
| 43 (41) | 17 (41.5) | 0.952 | |
| 2 (1.9) | 2 (4.9) | 0.32 | |
| 19 (18.1) | 6 (14.6) | 0.62 | |
| 10 (9.5) | 8 (19.5) | 0.099 | |
Angiographic and Procedural Characteristics.
| Parameter | Successful PCI n = 105 | Unsuccessful PCI n = 41 | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of CTO attempted, n (%) | |||
| First attempt | 97 (92.4) | 38 (92.7) | NS |
| Second attempt | 8 (7.6) | 3 (7.3) | NS |
| Antiplatelet Therapy, n (%) | NS | ||
| Clopidogrel | 86 (81.9) | 34 (82.9) | |
| Prasugrel | 14 (13.3) | 5 (12.2) | |
| Ticagrelor | 5 (4.8) | 2 (4.9) | |
| Number of wire used to cross, Mean ± SD | 2.49 ± 1.19 | 3.85 ± 1.17 | <.00001 |
| Guide wire method, n(%) | 0.067 | ||
| Retrograde CTO | 1 (1) | 3 (7.3) | |
| Antegrade CTO | 104 (99) | 38 (92.7) | |
| Balloon used, Mean ± SD | 2.06 ± 1.02 | 2.5 ± 1.9 | 0.265 |
| Stent per lesion, Mean ± SD | 1.57 ± 0.67 | 0 (0) | NA |
| Stent length, mm, Mean ± SD | 28.01 ± 7.88 | 0 (0) | NA |
| Stent diameter, mm, Mean ± SD | 2.66 ± 0.34 | 0(0) | NA |
| Penetration Technique | |||
| Parallel wire technique, n (%) | 9 (8.6) | 12 (29.3) | 0.001 |
| Anchoring balloon technique, n(%) | 5 (4.8) | 3 (7.3) | 0.54 |
| Procedure time, min, Mean ± SD | 56.77 ± 29.01 | 57.7 ± 33.7 | 0.933 |
| Contrast volume, ml, Mean ± SD | 337 ± 72 | 387 ± 97 | 0.0016 |
| IVUS, n(%) | 5 (4.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0.155 |
| Rotablation, n(%) | 2 (1.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0.373 |
| IABP, n(%) | 6 (5.7) | 1 (2.4) | 0.406 |
| POBA, n(%) | 7 (6.7) | 2 (4.9) | 0.69 |
| Wire crossed in less than 30 min, n (%) | 81 (77.1) | 3 (7.3) | <0.001 |
Number of wires that were used to cross the CTO successfully.
| No of wires used | No. of patients |
|---|---|
| 1 | 30 |
| 2 | 41 |
| 3 | 27 |
| 4 | 35 |
| 5 | 7 |
| 6 | 5 |
| 7 | 1 |
Showing the wire that successfully crossed the CTO.
| Wire that crossed | No. of Cases |
|---|---|
| 20 | |
| 18 | |
| 13 | |
| 12 | |
| 11 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |
Complications and in-hospital clinical outcomes.
| Clinical outcomes | Patients n = 146 | Successful PCI n = 105 | Unsuccessful PCI n = 41 | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procedural complications | ||||
| Coronary dissection | 15 (10.2) | 10 (9.5) | 5 (12.19) | 0.63 |
| Coronary perforation | 9 (6) | 5 (4.8) | 4 (9.8) | 0.26 |
| Cardiac tamponade | 1 (0.68) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.4) | 0.107 |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 0.84 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 0 | 0 | – | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | – |
Angina class at one year follow up.
| Angina class 1 year FU | Successful PCI | Unsuccessful PCI | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| n = 83 | n = 27 | 0.047 | |
| 0 | 75 (90.4) | 19 (70.37) | |
| 1 | 2 (2.4) | 5 (18.52) | |
| 2 | 6 (7.2) | 3 (11.11) | |
| 3 | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | |
| 4 | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) |
MACE events at one year follow up.
| Major adverse cardiac events at 1 year FU | Successful PCI | Unsuccessful PCI | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| n = 83 | n = 27 | ||
| Cardiac death | 4 (4.82) | 4 (14.81) | 0.08 |
| TLR | 1 (1.20) | 1 (3.70) | 0.43 |
| CABG | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.70) | 0.079 |
Fig. 2Kaplan Meier survival curve for event free survival at one year in successful versus unsuccessful CTO PCI.
Fig. 1Showing correlation between JCTO score and success rate. p value 0.0065.
| Endpoint | Definition |
|---|---|
| Cardiac Death | Cardiac death is defined as death by Acute myocardial infarction Cardiac perforation/cardiac tamponade Arrhythmia and conduction disturbance Cerebrovascular events suspected to be related to cerebral vascular events or procedures within 30 days of procedure Death due to procedural complications Cardiac causes cannot be ruled out death |
| MI | MI is defined as an abnormal cardiac biomarker level above the institutional upper limit of normal (either cardiac troponin or CK-MB), and either at least 1 of the following: a) Symptoms of myocardial ischemia, b) New or presumed new significant ST-segment–T wave (ST–T) changes or new LBBB on the ECG, c) Development of pathological Q waves on the ECG, d) Imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality, e) Identification of an intracoronary thrombus by angiography or autopsy. |
| In addition, periprocedural infarctions are defined as the following; | |
| Stent thrombosis | ARC (Academic Research Consortium Definitions) Definite stent thrombosis: clinical manifestation of acute coronary syndrome with pathologic confirmation of thrombosis, obstruction, and acute thrombosis Probable stent thrombosis: myocardial infarction of the target vessel without an unidentified death or thrombosis within the first 30 days Possible stent thrombosis: Death unclear after 30 days Acute: ≤1 day post-procedure Subacute: >1 day and ≤30 days post-procedure Late: >30 days and ≤1-year post-procedure Very late: >1-year post procedure |
| Revascularization | A coronary revascularization procedure may be either a CABG or a PCI. |