| Literature DB >> 30594154 |
Hui Wang1, Zhao-Yang Meng2, Song-Guo Li2, Jing-Jing Wang2, Jiao Sun2, Hong-Yang Li3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimes to characterize the fundus structural changes in patients with nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) and the correlation between macular vessel density, retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) parameters and visual field sensitivity (VFS) in NAION patients.Entities:
Keywords: Choroid; Macular; Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy; Vessel density
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30594154 PMCID: PMC6311001 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-018-1007-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
Fig. 1RTVue-100 OCT analysed the optic nerve head imaging in the optic disc area (ONH protocol, GCC protocol and 3D Disc) mode. The optic nerve head (ONH) map protocol was used to obtain RNFL thickness and ONH indices measurements; Other indices such as three avg. GCC parameters (total, superior and inferior), focal loss volume (FLV), and global loss volume (GLV) were measured in the GCC protocol
Fig. 2OCT angiogram of a superficial vascular capillary plexus in a 6 × 6 mm area centered on the macula. The en-face image of the superficial plexus was segmented with an inner boundary at 3 μm beneath the internal limiting membrane and the outer boundary was set at 15 μm beneath the inner plexiform layer
Fig. 3Retinal superficial vessel density map in healthy, uninvolved, and NAION eyes
Demographic characteristics of all patients
| Variables | Healthy | Uninvolved eyes | NAION eyes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ||
| Demographic characteristics | ||||
| Age, yearb | 53.70 ± 9.95 | 58.17 ± 13.49 | 55.05 ± 7.93 | |
| Gender, male/female | 18/9 | 21/9 | 24/13 | |
| Disease duration, months | – | – | 9.25 ± 1.13 | |
| Clinical characteristics | ||||
| Systolic BP, mm Hga | 128(120,130) | 127(120,130) | 120(115,130) | |
| Diastolic BP, mm Hga | 77(75,80) | 80(80,80) | 80(80,80) | |
| Heart rate, beats/minb | 79.40 ± 5.91 | 79.53 ± 6.13 | 77.67 ± 4.53 | |
| History of diabetes, n (%) | 5(18.52%) | 7(23.33%) | 10(27.03%) | |
| History of hypertension, n (%) | 6(22.22%) | 7(23.33%) | 9(24.32%) | |
BP Blood pressure, NAION nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
Statistical significance tested by ANOVA for normal distributions and Kruskal–Wallis tests for nonnormal distributions; all comparisons were corrected with the post hoc test. The categorical data were analyzed using the Fisher’s exact test of chi-square tests
aNonnormally distributed variables, represented by median (interquartile range)
bNormally distributed variables, represented by mean (±standard deviation)
Optic nerve characteristics and visual performance of all the patients
| Variables | Healthy eyes | Uninvolved eyes | NAION eyes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 27) | (n = 30) | (n = 37) | ||
| Ocular characteristics | ||||
| IOP, mm Hg | 13.99 ± 2.90 | 14.31 ± 2.00 | 14.90 ± 2.50 | |
| RNFL Thickness (μm) | 102.11 ± 7.21 | 98.90 ± 10.55 | 70.86 ± 10.50 | |
| GCC Analysis | ||||
| GCC Thickness (μm) | 98.27 ± 7.43 | 96.36 ± 6.82 | 72.15 ± 10.68 | |
| FLV (%) | 0.86 ± 0.40 | 2.11 ± 1.65 | 9.59 ± 3.34 | |
| GLV (%) | 3.72 ± 1.70 | 4.56 ± 3.60 | 24.02 ± 8.75 | |
| VF parameter (Mean ± SD, dB) | ||||
| MD | N/A | N/A | −11.02 ± 3.75 | – |
| Superior TD | N/A | N/A | −6.01 ± 2.21 | – |
| Inferior TD | N/A | N/A | −9.98 ± 3.34 | – |
FLV Focal loss volume, GCC ganglion cell complex, GLV global loss volume, IOP intraocular pressure, NAION nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, RNFL retinal nerve fiber layer, VF visual field, MD mean deviation, dB decibels
*Statistical significance tested by ANOVA for normal distributions and Kruskal-Wallis tests for nonnormal distributions, all comparisons were corrected with post hoc test
† Significant difference between mean values of healthy eyes and uninvolved eyes
‡ Significant difference between mean values of healthy eyes and NAION eyes
§ Significant difference between mean values of uninvolved eyes and NAION eyes
Mean vessel density and retinal thickness measured in OCT angiography of all the patients
| OCTA Parameters | Healthy | Uninvolved eyes | NAION eyes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 27) | (n = 30) | (n = 37) | ||
| SVD (%) | ||||
| Whole | 54.50 ± 1.34 | 50.55 ± 3.27 | 44.31 ± 5.35 | |
| Fovea | 29.57 ± 1.68 | 25.40 ± 5.76 | 23.28 ± 5.08 | |
| Parafovea | 56.57 ± 1.18 | 54.37 ± 3.13 | 48.76 ± 5.17 | |
| Superior-Hemi | 56.37 ± 1.72 | 53.98 ± 3.55 | 48.72 ± 5.50 | |
| Inferior -Hemi | 56.73 ± 1.51 | 54.74 ± 3.20 | 49.05 ± 5.07 | |
| DVD (%) | ||||
| Whole | 60.35 ± 1.12 | 60.08 ± 1.77 | 57.12 ± 2.48 | |
| Fovea | 31.49 ± 2.21 | 30.36 ± 3.67 | 26.73 ± 2.70 | |
| Parafovea | 62.08 ± 1.25 | 59.09 ± 1.97 | 54.36 ± 3.36 | |
| Superior-Hemi | 61.82 ± 1.94 | 59.05 ± 2.23 | 54.87 ± 3.97 | |
| Inferior -Hemi | 60.75 ± 2.23 | 59.13 ± 1.97 | 53.95 ± 3.80 | |
| CVD (%) | ||||
| Whole | 64.12 ± 0.95 | 63.94 ± 1.49 | 63.33 ± 1.27 | |
| Fovea | 59.39 ± 1.94 | 58.78 ± 2.90 | 59.07 ± 4.09 | |
| Parafovea | 64.97 ± 1.34 | 65.68 ± 1.50 | 63.21 ± 2.26 | |
| Superior-Hemi | 66.13 ± 1.65 | 65.64 ± 1.76 | 62.90 ± 2.34 | |
| Inferior -Hemi | 65.56 ± 1.49 | 65.73 ± 1.59 | 63.15 ± 1.80 | |
| Parafovea SRT (um) | 111.89 ± 11.86 | 111.47 ± 12.14 | 96.43 ± 14.40 | |
| Parafovea DRT (um) | 193.04 ± 9.37 | 191.67 ± 12.31 | 183.32 ± 11.86 | |
NAION Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, OCT-A optical coherence tomography angiography, SVD superficial vessel density, DVD deep vessel density, CVD choroid vessel density, SRT superficial retinal thickness, DRT deep retinal thickness
*Statistical significance tested by ANOVA for normal distributions and Kruskal–Wallis tests for nonnormal distributions; all comparisons were corrected with the post hoc test
†Significant difference between mean values of healthy eyes and uninvolved eyes
‡Significant difference between mean values of healthy eyes and NAION eyes
§Significant difference between mean values of uninvolved eyes and NAION eyes
Spearman rank correlation analyses on RNFL thickness, vessel density and visual field
| Variables | VF loss | |
|---|---|---|
| Spearman rank correlation | ||
| r |
| |
| RNFL thickness (mm) | −0.788 | < 0.001 |
| Whole SVD (%) | −0.355 | 0.372 |
| Whole DVD (%) | −0.417 | 0.128 |
| Whole CVD (%) | −0.265 | 0.108 |
RNFL retinal nerve fiber layer, SVD superficial vessel density, DVD deep vessel density, CVD choroid vessel density, VF visual field
Diagnostic accuracy (AUROC) for OCT-A vessel density and RNFL thickness measurements in all the patients
| Diagnostic parameters | Healthy eyes | Uninvolved eyes | NAION eyes | AUROC (SE) NAION vs. healthy Eyes | AUROC (SE) Uninvolved eyes vs. healthy Eyes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (95% CI) | (95% CI) | (95% CI) | ||||
| Average RNFL, um | 102.1 (99.6–105.1) | 98.9 (96.0–103.1) | 70.9 (67.7–74.1) | < 0.001*,†,‡ | 0.99 (0.01) | 0.68 (0.07) |
| Parafovea SRT, um | 111.9 (107.7–115.8) | 111.5 (107.3–115.3) | 96.4 (92.3–101.0) | < 0.001*,†,‡ | 0.81 (0.05) | 0.50 (0.08) |
| Parafovea DRT, um | 193.0 (189.5–197.3) | 191.7 (187.6–196.1) | 183.3 (179.7–187.3) | 0.001*,†,‡ | 0.73 (0.06) | 0.51 (0.08) |
| OCT-A whole SVD,% | 54.5 (54.0–55.0) | 50.5 (49.5–51.8) | 44.3 (42.5–46.0) | < 0.001*,†,,‡§ | 0.96 (0.03) | 0.89 (0.05) |
| OCT-A whole DVD,% | 60.3 (59.9–60.8) | 60.1 (59.6–60.6) | 57.1 (56.1–57.8) | < 0.001*,†,‡,§ | 0.89 (0.04) | 0.53 (0.08) |
| OCT-A whole CVD,% | 64.1 (63.8–64.5) | 63.9 (63.4–64.5) | 63.3 (62.9–63.7) | 0.079 | 0.68 (0.07) | 0.53 (0.08) |
AUROC Area under the receiver operating characteristic, CI confidence interval, CVD choroid vessel density, DRT deep retinal thickness, DVD deep vessel density, NAION Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, OCT-A optical coherence tomography angiography, SE standard error, SRT superficial retinal thickness, SVD superficial vessel density, RNFL retinal nerve fiber layer
*Statistical significance tested by ANOVA; corrected with the post hoc test
†Significant difference between mean values of healthy eyes and uninvolved eyes
‡Significant difference between mean values of uninvolved and NAION eyes
§Significant difference between mean values of healthy and uninvolved eyes
Fig. 4a. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curves for average RNFL thickness (0.99), followed by whole SVD (0.96), whole DVD (0.89), parafovea SRT (0.81), and parafovea DRT (0.73), for differentiating between healthy and NAION eyes. b. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curves for average whole SVD (0.89), followed by average RNFL thickness (0.68) for differentiating between healthy and uninvolved eyes