Roy Nitulescu1, Jim Young2, Sahar Saeed3, Curtis Cooper4, Joseph Cox5, Valerie Martel-Laferriere6, Mark Hull7, Sharon Walmsley8, Mark Tyndall9, Alexander Wong10, Marina B Klein11. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases/Chronic Viral Illness Service, Glen site, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases/Chronic Viral Illness Service, Glen site, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada; Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. 5. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases/Chronic Viral Illness Service, Glen site, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. 6. Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada. 7. Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada. 8. University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network, Vancouver, Canada. 9. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. 10. Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Regina, Canada. 11. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases/Chronic Viral Illness Service, Glen site, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada; CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network, Vancouver, Canada. Electronic address: marina.klein@mcgill.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients co-infected with HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are a priority target for HCV treatment. The simplicity and efficacy of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) should help overcome patient, provider, and structural barriers to scaling up treatment. METHODS: We estimated between-centre variation in DAA treatment uptake among 1734 patients enrolled at the 18 centres of the Canadian Co-Infection Cohort-a prospective cohort of adults co-infected with HIV and HCV. We then compared this variation to that observed during the interferon era. Time to treatment uptake was modeled using a Weibull time-to-event model adjusting for centre and patient characteristics thought to have an impact on treatment initiation in the DAA era. RESULTS: At the time of administrative censoring (December 31, 2016), 981 cohort participants were eligible for second-generation DAA therapy (HCV RNA positive after November 21, 2013) of whom 278 initiated DAAs (16 patients per 100 person-years). Patients with low monthly income, Indigenous ethnicity, recent injection drug use, HCV genotype 3, or unknown HCV genotype were less likely to start treatment. After adjusting for patient characteristics, the estimated between-centre variance (σ2) was 0.29 (95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.09-0.89), considerably lower than during the interferon era (σ2 = 0.87, 95% CrI: 0.49-1.5). This between-centre variance was further reduced by the addition of centre-level effects for jurisdiction (σ2 = 0.15, 95% CrI: 0.02-0.60). CONCLUSION: Much of the variation in treatment uptake between centres can now be attributed to regional differences. This suggests that after the introduction of DAAs, treatment barriers have shifted towards prescribing and reimbursement restrictions based on liver fibrosis, which vary by jurisdiction. The removal of these restrictions, however, will need to be paired with strategies to overcome patient-level barriers, which continue to prevent marginalized people and active substance users from accessing treatment.
BACKGROUND:Patients co-infected with HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are a priority target for HCV treatment. The simplicity and efficacy of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) should help overcome patient, provider, and structural barriers to scaling up treatment. METHODS: We estimated between-centre variation in DAA treatment uptake among 1734 patients enrolled at the 18 centres of the Canadian Co-Infection Cohort-a prospective cohort of adults co-infected with HIV and HCV. We then compared this variation to that observed during the interferon era. Time to treatment uptake was modeled using a Weibull time-to-event model adjusting for centre and patient characteristics thought to have an impact on treatment initiation in the DAA era. RESULTS: At the time of administrative censoring (December 31, 2016), 981 cohort participants were eligible for second-generation DAA therapy (HCV RNA positive after November 21, 2013) of whom 278 initiated DAAs (16 patients per 100 person-years). Patients with low monthly income, Indigenous ethnicity, recent injection drug use, HCV genotype 3, or unknown HCV genotype were less likely to start treatment. After adjusting for patient characteristics, the estimated between-centre variance (σ2) was 0.29 (95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.09-0.89), considerably lower than during the interferon era (σ2 = 0.87, 95% CrI: 0.49-1.5). This between-centre variance was further reduced by the addition of centre-level effects for jurisdiction (σ2 = 0.15, 95% CrI: 0.02-0.60). CONCLUSION: Much of the variation in treatment uptake between centres can now be attributed to regional differences. This suggests that after the introduction of DAAs, treatment barriers have shifted towards prescribing and reimbursement restrictions based on liver fibrosis, which vary by jurisdiction. The removal of these restrictions, however, will need to be paired with strategies to overcome patient-level barriers, which continue to prevent marginalized people and active substance users from accessing treatment.
Authors: Andreea A Artenie; Evan B Cunningham; Gregory J Dore; Brian Conway; Olav Dalgard; Jeff Powis; Philip Bruggmann; Margaret Hellard; Curtis Cooper; Philip Read; Jordan J Feld; Behzad Hajarizadeh; Janaki Amin; Karine Lacombe; Catherine Stedman; Alain H Litwin; Pip Marks; Gail V Matthews; Sophie Quiene; Amanda Erratt; Julie Bruneau; Jason Grebely Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2020-05-23 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Jiafeng Li; Julia L Casey; Zoë R Greenwald; Abdool S Yasseen Iii; Melisa Dickie; Jordan J Feld; Curtis L Cooper; Angela M Crawley Journal: Can Liver J Date: 2021-02-24
Authors: Matt Driedger; Marie-Louise Vachon; Alexander Wong; Brian Conway; Alnoor Ramji; Sergio Borgia; Ed Tam; Lisa Barrett; Dan Smyth; Jordan J Feld; Sam S Lee; Curtis Cooper Journal: Can Liver J Date: 2021-08-09
Authors: David Ortiz-Paredes; Afia Amoako; Taline Ekmekjian; Kim Engler; Bertrand Lebouché; Marina B Klein Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-06-24
Authors: Daan W Von den Hoff; Floor A C Berden; Femke Atsma; Arnt F A Schellekens; Joost P H Drenth Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-02-21 Impact factor: 4.241