Literature DB >> 30592078

Rapid assessment of hyperdiploidy in plasma cell disorders using a novel multi-parametric flow cytometry method.

Surbhi Sidana1, Dragan Jevremovic2, Rhett P Ketterling2, Nidhi Tandon1, Angela Dispenzieri1, Morie A Gertz1, Patricia T Greipp2, Linda B Baughn3, Francis K Buadi1, Martha Q Lacy1, William Morice2, Curtis Hanson2, Michael Timm2, David Dingli1, Suzanne R Hayman1, Wilson I Gonsalves1, Prashant Kapoor1, Robert A Kyle1, Nelson Leung1,4, Ronald S Go1, John A Lust1, S Vincent Rajkumar1, Shaji K Kumar1.   

Abstract

Trisomies of odd numbered chromosomes are seen in nearly half of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and typically correlate with a hyperdiploid state and better overall survival (OS). We compared DNA ploidy of monoclonal plasma cells (as a surrogate for the presence of trisomies) assessed simultaneously by PCPRO (plasma cell proliferative index), a novel method that estimates DNA index by multi-parametric flow cytometry to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in 1703 patients with plasma cell disorders. The distribution of ploidy was hyperdiploid: 759 (45%), diploid 765 (45%), hypodiploid: 71 (4%), tetraploid/near-tetraploid: 108 (6%). FISH identified trisomies in 82% (621/756) of patients with hyperdiploidy by PCPRO and no trisomy by FISH was observed in 88% (730/834) of patients without hyperdiploidy. 95% (795/834) of patients without hyperdiploidy on PCPRO had one or less trisomy by FISH. Sensitivity and specificity of PCPRO for detecting hyperdiploidy was 86% (621/725) and 84% (730/865), respectively. Sensitivity increased to 94% (579/618) for patients with more than one trisomy. Newly diagnosed MM patients with hyperdiploidy on PCPRO (147/275) had better OS compared to nonhyperdiploid patients (median not reached vs 59 months, P = 0.008) and better progression free survival (median: 33 vs 23 months, P = 0.03). Within the hyperdiploidy group, patients with high-hyperdiploidy (DNA index: 1.19-1.50) versus those with low-hyperdiploidy (DNA index: 1.05-1.18) had superior OS (3 year OS of 88% vs 68% P = 0.03). Ploidy assessment by flow cytometry can provide rapid, valuable prognostic information and also reduces the number of copy number FISH probes required and hence the cost of FISH.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30592078      PMCID: PMC8083940          DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  21 in total

1.  High incidence of trisomies 1q, 9q, and 11q in multiple myeloma: results from a comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis.

Authors:  P Liebisch; C Wendl; A Wellmann; A Kröber; G Schilling; H Goldschmidt; H Einsele; C Straka; M Bentz; S Stilgenbauer; H Döhner
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Ploidy status rarely changes in myeloma patients at disease progression.

Authors:  W J Chng; J M Winkler; P R Greipp; S M Jalal; P L Bergsagel; M Chesi; M C Trendle; G J Ahmann; K Henderson; E Blood; M M Oken; A Hulbert; S A Van Wier; R Santana-Dávila; R A Kyle; M A Gertz; M Q Lacy; A Dispenzieri; R Fonseca
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 3.156

3.  Genetic abnormalities and survival in multiple myeloma: the experience of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome.

Authors:  Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Michel Attal; Philippe Moreau; Catherine Charbonnel; Frédéric Garban; Cyrille Hulin; Serge Leyvraz; Mauricette Michallet; Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha; Laurent Garderet; Gérald Marit; Lucienne Michaux; Laurent Voillat; Marc Renaud; Bernard Grosbois; Gaelle Guillerm; Lotfi Benboubker; Mathieu Monconduit; Catherine Thieblemont; Philippe Casassus; Denis Caillot; Anne-Marie Stoppa; Jean-Jacques Sotto; Marc Wetterwald; Charles Dumontet; Jean-Gabriel Fuzibet; Isabelle Azais; Véronique Dorvaux; Marc Zandecki; Régis Bataille; Stéphane Minvielle; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Thierry Facon; Claire Mathiot
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Understanding the role of hyperdiploidy in myeloma prognosis: which trisomies really matter?

Authors:  Marie-Lorraine Chretien; Jill Corre; Valerie Lauwers-Cances; Florence Magrangeas; Alice Cleynen; Edwige Yon; Cyrille Hulin; Xavier Leleu; Frederique Orsini-Piocelle; Jean-Sebastien Blade; Claudine Sohn; Lionel Karlin; Xavier Delbrel; Benjamin Hebraud; Murielle Roussel; Gerald Marit; Laurent Garderet; Mohamad Mohty; Philippe Rodon; Laurent Voillat; Bruno Royer; Arnaud Jaccard; Karim Belhadj; Jean Fontan; Denis Caillot; Anne-Marie Stoppa; Michel Attal; Thierry Facon; Philippe Moreau; Stephane Minvielle; Hervé Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  A validated FISH trisomy index demonstrates the hyperdiploid and nonhyperdiploid dichotomy in MGUS.

Authors:  Wee Joo Chng; Scott A Van Wier; Gregory J Ahmann; Jerry M Winkler; Syed M Jalal; Peter Leif Bergsagel; Marta Chesi; Mike C Trendle; Martin M Oken; Emily Blood; Kim Henderson; Rafael Santana-Dávila; Robert A Kyle; Morie A Gertz; Martha Q Lacy; Angela Dispenzieri; Philip R Greipp; Rafael Fonseca
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Prognostic factors for hyperdiploid-myeloma: effects of chromosome 13 deletions and IgH translocations.

Authors:  W J Chng; R Santana-Dávila; S A Van Wier; G J Ahmann; S M Jalal; P L Bergsagel; M Chesi; M C Trendle; S Jacobus; E Blood; M M Oken; K Henderson; R A Kyle; M A Gertz; M Q Lacy; A Dispenzieri; P R Greipp; R Fonseca
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  Flow cytometric analysis of DNA content of bone marrow cells in patients with plasma cell myeloma: clinical implications.

Authors:  P A Bunn; S Krasnow; R W Makuch; M L Schlam; G P Schechter
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  The recurrent IgH translocations are highly associated with nonhyperdiploid variant multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Rafael Fonseca; Carina S Debes-Marun; Elisa B Picken; Gordon W Dewald; Sandra C Bryant; Jerry M Winkler; Emily Blood; Martin M Oken; Rafael Santana-Dávila; Natalia González-Paz; Robert A Kyle; Morie A Gertz; Angela Dispenzieri; Martha Q Lacy; Philip R Greipp
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  IMWG consensus on risk stratification in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  W J Chng; A Dispenzieri; C-S Chim; R Fonseca; H Goldschmidt; S Lentzsch; N Munshi; A Palumbo; J S Miguel; P Sonneveld; M Cavo; S Usmani; B G M Durie; H Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  Occurrence and prognostic significance of cytogenetic evolution in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  M Binder; S V Rajkumar; R P Ketterling; A Dispenzieri; M Q Lacy; M A Gertz; F K Buadi; S R Hayman; Y L Hwa; S R Zeldenrust; J A Lust; S J Russell; N Leung; P Kapoor; R S Go; W I Gonsalves; R A Kyle; S K Kumar
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 11.037

View more
  3 in total

1.  Deciphering the chronology of copy number alterations in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Anil Aktas Samur; Stephane Minvielle; Masood Shammas; Mariateresa Fulciniti; Florence Magrangeas; Paul G Richardson; Philippe Moreau; Michel Attal; Kenneth C Anderson; Giovanni Parmigiani; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Nikhil C Munshi; Mehmet Kemal Samur
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 11.037

2.  Mate pair sequencing outperforms fluorescence in situ hybridization in the genomic characterization of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  James Smadbeck; Jess F Peterson; Kathryn E Pearce; Beth A Pitel; Andrea Lebron Figueroa; Michael Timm; Dragan Jevremovic; Min Shi; A Keith Stewart; Esteban Braggio; Daniel L Riggs; P Leif Bergsagel; George Vasmatzis; Hutton M Kearney; Nicole L Hoppman; Rhett P Ketterling; Shaji Kumar; S Vincent Rajkumar; Patricia T Greipp; Linda B Baughn
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 11.037

Review 3.  Targeting Chemokine Receptor CCR1 as a Potential Therapeutic Approach for Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Annette Gilchrist; Stephanie L Echeverria
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 5.555

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.