| Literature DB >> 30592073 |
Michele Santacatterina1, Celia García-Pareja1, Rino Bellocco2,3, Anders Sönnerborg4, Anna Mia Ekström5,6, Matteo Bottai1.
Abstract
Marginal structural Cox models have been used to estimate the causal effect of a time-varying treatment on a survival outcome in the presence of time-dependent confounders. These methods rely on the positivity assumption, which states that the propensity scores are bounded away from zero and one. Practical violations of this assumption are common in longitudinal studies, resulting in extreme weights that may yield erroneous inferences. Truncation, which consists of replacing outlying weights with less extreme ones, is the most common approach to control for extreme weights to date. While truncation reduces the variability in the weights and the consequent sampling variability of the estimator, it can also introduce bias. Instead of truncated weights, we propose using optimal probability weights, defined as those that have a specified variance and the smallest Euclidean distance from the original, untruncated weights. The set of optimal weights is obtained by solving a constrained quadratic optimization problem. The proposed weights are evaluated in a simulation study and applied to the assessment of the effect of treatment on time to death among people in Sweden who live with human immunodeficiency virus and inject drugs.Entities:
Keywords: causal inference; longitudinal data; positivity assumption; probability weights; survival analysis
Year: 2018 PMID: 30592073 DOI: 10.1002/sim.8080
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stat Med ISSN: 0277-6715 Impact factor: 2.373