| Literature DB >> 30591890 |
Humaira Bano1, Nasreen Jahan1, Shaikh Ajij Ahmed Makbul1, B N Kumar1, Sadique Husain1, Atiya Sayed2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To investigate the antilithiatic effect of hydroalcoholic extract of Kabab Chini (Piper cubeba L.) fruit in male Sprague Dawley rats.Entities:
Keywords: CaOx crystals; Cystone; Piper cubeba; Unani medicine; Urolithiasis
Year: 2018 PMID: 30591890 PMCID: PMC6303358 DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2018.06.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Integr Med Res ISSN: 2213-4220
Effect of Piper cubeba L. on urine calcium oxalate crystals
| Groups | Treatment | No. of CaO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8th day 22nd day | |||
| Plain control | 1 mL of 5% GA | 7.5 ± 0.88 | 6.66 ± 0.66 |
| Disease control A | EG 0.75% and AC1% | 131.7 ± 10.93 | – |
| Disease control B | EG 0.75% and AC1% | 130.8 ± 10.83 | 92.50 ± 8.24 |
| Standard control | EG 0.75% and AC1% + cystone 750 mg/kg | 132.7 ± 16.98 | 8.33 ± 1.87 |
| Test group A | EG 0.75% and AC1% + | 122.5 ± 12.83 | 7.83 ± 0.83 |
| Test group B | EG 0.75% and AC1% + | 113.3 ± 13.82 | 7.33 ± 0.95 |
EG, ethylene glycol; AC, ammonium chloride; GA, gum acacia.
Values expressed as mean ± SEM.
n = 6 animals in each group.
Test used one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer Multiple Comparisons test.
Disease control A, B; standard control; test group A, B vs plain control on 7th day.
Standard control; test group A, B vs disease control A on 22nd day.
Standard control; test group A, B vs disease control B on 22nd day.
p < 0.001.
Effect of Piper cubeba L. on urinary parameters in rats
| Groups | Treatment | Ca (mg/dl) | Creatinine (mg/dl) | P (mg/dl) | Na (mEq/dl) | Cl (mg/dl) | Mg (mg/dl) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plain control | 1 mL of 5% GA | 1.57 ± 0.17 | 0.88 ± 0.221 | 63.28 ± 1.53 | 141.9 ± 10.19 | 131.6 ± 14.84 | 1.50 ± 0.28 |
| Disease control A | EG 0.75% and AC1% | 5.81 ± 0.97 | 0.10 ± 0.138 | 73.47 ± 0.86 | 210.2 ± 21.05 | 146.1 ± 6.66 | 0.37 ± 0.12 |
| Disease control B | EG 0.75% and AC1% | 8.07 ± 0.21 | 0.17 ± 0.15 | 70.88 ± 0.32 | 182.8 ± 10.89 | 147.7 ± 17.17 | 0.45 ± 0.10 |
| Standard control | EG 0.75% and AC1% + cystone 750 mg/kg | 1.82 ± 0.25 | 0.82 ± 0.03 | 69.71 ± 0.43 | 142.4 ± 9.36 | 133.8 ± 6.73 | 1.42 ± 0.12 |
| Test group A | EG 0.75% and AC1% + | 2.09 ± 0.23 | 0.71 ± 0.11 | 70.31 ± 0.03 | 146.1 ± 4.00 | 144.6 ± 5.10 | 0.9587 ± 0.11 |
| Test group B | EG 0.75% and AC1% + | 1.83 ± 0.08 | 0.73 ± 0.07 | 70.80 ± 0.04 | 143.4 ± 2.11 | 136.6 ± 11.20 | 1.37 ± 0.17 |
EG, ethylene glycol; AC, ammonium chloride; GA, gum acacia.
Values expressed as mean ± SEM.
n = 6 animals in each group.
Test used one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer Multiple Comparisons test.
Disease control A, B vs plain control.
Standard control; test group A, B vs disease control A.
Standard control; test group A, B vs disease control B.
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.001.
Effect of Piper cubeba L. on Serum Parameters (mg/dl) in Rats
| Groups | Treatment | Calcium | Creatinine | Urea | Phosphorus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plain control | 1 mL of 5% GA | 8.05 ± 0.42 | 1.31 ± 0.129 | 40.26 ± 3.51 | 2.14 ± 0.32 |
| Disease control A | EG 0.75% and AC1% | 10.40 ± 0.65 | 3.05 ± 0.48 | 53.65 ± 5.35 | 3.42 ± 0.45 |
| Disease control B | EG 0.75% and AC1% | 9.06 ± 0.89 | 3.02 ± 0.60 | 72.15 ± 9.83 | 3.18 ± 0.36 |
| Standard control | EG 0.75% and AC1% + cystone 750 mg/kg | 8.35 ± 0.49 | 1.39 ± 0.05 | 42.80 ± 4.35 | 2.41 ± 0.31 |
| Test group A | EG 0.75% and AC1% + | 8.62 ± 0.33 | 1.41 ± 0.21 | 45.99 ± 3.89 | 2.77 ± 0.49 |
| Test group B | EG 0.75% and AC1% + | 8.51 ± 0.32 | 1.40 ± 0.06 | 43.02 ± 2.92 | 2.48 ± 0.19 |
EG, ethylene glycol; AC, ammonium chloride; GA, gum acacia.
Values expressed as mean ± SEM.
n = 6 animals in each group.
Test used one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer Multiple Comparisons test.
Disease control A, B vs plain control.
Standard control; test group A, B vs disease control A.
Standard control; test group A, B vs disease control B.
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.
Effect of Piper cubeba L. on Kidney Homogenate Parameters (mg/100 g) in Rats
| Kidney homogenate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | Treatment | Calcium | Phosphorus |
| Plain control | 1 mL of 5% GA | 0.83 ± 0.39 | 2.22 ± 0.35 |
| Disease control A | EG 0.75% and AC1% | 3.33 ± 1.04 | 4.29 ± 0.29 |
| Disease control B | EG 0.75% and AC1% | 2.12 ± 0.58 | 3.69 ± 0.61 |
| Standard control | EG 0.75% and AC1% + cystone 750 mg/kg | 1.05 ± 0.19 | 2.33 ± 0.32 |
| Test group A | EG 0.75% and AC1% + | 0.83 ± 0.23 | 2.66 ± 0.35 |
| Test group B | EG 0.75% and AC1% + | 0.85 ± 0.17 | 2.52 ± 0.32 |
EG, ethylene glycol; AC, ammonium chloride; GA, gum acacia.
Values expressed as mean ± SEM.
n = 6 animals in each group.
Test used one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer Multiple Comparisons test.
Disease control A vs plain control.
Standard; test group A, B vs disease control A.
p < 0.05.
Fig. 1Microscopic images by light microscopy (400×) of kidney sections after Haematoxylin and Eosin staining from Plain control (a) showing intact architecture with glomerulus, tubules and blood vessels. Disease control (b) showing normal architecture with mild hyper cellularity in glomerulus while in disease control (c) intact architecture, mild hyper cellularity with increased mesengial cells, congested blood vessels. Standard control (d) showing normal cellularity, degenerative changes in tubular epithelial cells, dilated and congested blood vessels. Test group A (e) showing normal cellularity and mild congested blood vessels. Test group B (f) showing normal cellularity, eosinophilic material in tubules and normal blood vessels.