| Literature DB >> 30591742 |
Sameh R Ismail1, Muneira M Almazmi1, Rajab Khokhar1, Wedad AlMadani2, Ali Hadadi2, Omar Hijazi1, Mohamed S Kabbani1, Ghassan Shaath1, Mahmoud Elbarbary1,2,3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Systemic to pulmonary shunt (commonly known as Modified Blalock-Taussig shunt) is a palliative procedure in cyanotic heart diseases to overcome inadequate blood flow to the lungs. Based on the most recent risk stratification score, the mortality and morbidity of this procedure is still high especially in neonates and over-shunting patients. We developed and implemented protocol-based management in March 2013 to better standardize the management of these patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of applying this protocol-based management in our center.Entities:
Keywords: Blalock–Taussig shunt; CC, cubic centimeter; CI, confidence interval; Cardiac surgery; Congenital heart disease; ECHO, echocardiography; ICU, intensive care unit; IQR, Interquartile Range; IRB, institutional review board; IU, international unit; Kg, kilogram; MBTS, Modified Blalock–Taussig shunt; N, number; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; PTT, partial thromboplastin time; Pediatric; Post-operative; RD, risk difference; RR, relative risk; RRR, relative risk ratio; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error; SMR, standardized mortality ratio; sig, significance
Year: 2018 PMID: 30591742 PMCID: PMC6303540 DOI: 10.1016/j.ehj.2018.09.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Egypt Heart J ISSN: 1110-2608
Fig. 1Guidelines for Over-shunting patients: (SAT: Saturation, SaO2: arterial Oxygen saturation, QP:QS: pulmonary flow to systemic flow ratio, PH: potential of Hydrogen, ETT: Endo-tracheal tube, PEEP: positive end expiratory pressure, NIMV: Noninvasive mechanical ventilation, CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure, HFNC: High flow nasal cannula, BP: Blood pressure, SBP: systolic blood pressure, DPB: Diastolic blood pressure, mcg: microgram, KG: kilogram, MIN: minute, temp: temperature, ECG: Electrocardiogram, ABG: Arterial blood gas, Qp: pulmonary flow, QS: systemic flow AO: Aorta, SVC: Superior vena cava, pulm: Pulmonary, PA: Pulmonary artery.
Fig. 2Guidelines for Under-shunting patients: (SAT: Saturation, SaO2: arterial Oxygen saturation, Fio2: fraction of inspired oxygen QP:QS: pulmonary flow to systemic flow ratio, PH: potential of Hydrogen, ETT: Endo-tracheal tube, PEEP: positive end expiratory pressure, iNO: inhaled Nitric oxide, PPM: parts per million, ECHO: Echocardiography, BP: Blood pressure, SBP: systolic blood pressure, gm.: gram, dl: deciliter, ABG: Arterial blood gas, Qp: pulmonary flow, QS: systemic flow, AO: Aorta, SVC: Superior vena cava, pulm: Pulmonary, PA: Pulmonary artery.
Main Diagnosis of the protocol cases and the control cases: (DTGA: Transposition of great arteries, PS: Pulmonary stenosis, AVSD: Atrio-ventricular septal defect, TOF: Tetralogy of Fallout).
| Main diagnosis | Protocol group (N: 25) | Control group (N:172) |
|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary and/or Tricusped atresia | 11 | 93 |
| Double outlet right ventricle and PS | 6 | 20 |
| Double inlet left ventricle and PS | 2 | 10 |
| DTGA and PS | 4 | 24 |
| AVSD and PS | 2 | 8 |
| AVSD and TOF | 0 | 2 |
| TOF | 0 | 9 |
| Sever PS | 0 | 5 |
| Double outlet left ventricle | 0 | 1 |
Comparison between continuous outcomes before and after the protocol implementation: (SD: Standard deviation, SE: Standard error, sig: significance, CI: Confidence interval, ICU: Intensive care unit).
| Variable | Group | Number | Mean | SD | SE | Sig | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Up | |||||||
| Age (days) | Control | 172 | 240.57 | 828.433 | 63.167 | 0.002 | 79.23 | 329.9 |
| Protocol | 25 | 36.00 | 32.712 | 6.542 | ||||
| Weight (Kilogram) | Control | 172 | 4.7310 | 4.10280 | 0.31284 | 0.000 | 0.631 | 1.99 |
| Protocol | 25 | 3.4188 | 0.73000 | 0.14600 | ||||
| Period on inotropes (Hours) | Control | 161 | 116.40 | 162.620 | 12.816 | 0.037 | −252.3 | −8.17 |
| A | 25 | 246.64 | 290.145 | 58.029 | ||||
| Length of hospital stay (Days) | Control | 172 | 27.90 | 27.182 | 2.073 | 0.245 | −4.67 | 18.15 |
| Protocol | 25 | 21.16 | 25.929 | 5.186 | ||||
| ICU stay (Days) | Control | 172 | 14.74 | 18.63 | 1.42 | 0.05 | 3.80 | 10.76 |
| Protocol | 25 | 7.44 | 5.15 | 1.03 | ||||
| Hours of ventilation | Control | 172 | 154.57 | 230.082 | 17.544 | 0.000 | 108.1 | 178.5 |
| Protocol | 25 | 11.20 | 16.437 | 3.287 | ||||
Comparison between categorical outcomes before and after the protocol implementation.
| Variable | Groups | P value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Protocol | |||||
| Count | Column N % | Count | Column N % | |||
| Gender | Male | 98 | 57.0% | 19 | 76.0% | 0.083 |
| Female | 74 | 43.0% | 6 | 24.0% | ||
| Number of re-intubations | 0 | 137 | 79.7% | 20 | 80.0% | 0.000 |
| 1 | 22 | 12.8% | 3 | 12.0% | ||
| 2 | 5 | 2.9% | 2 | 8.0% | ||
| 3 | 4 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
| 4 | 4 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
| Death | No | 144 | 80.7% | 23 | 92.0% | 0.26 |
| Yes | 28 | 19.3% | 2 | 8.0% | ||
| Wound infection | No | 160 | 93.0% | 22 | 88.0% | 0.413 |
| Yes | 12 | 7.0% | 3 | 12.0% | ||
| Arrhythmia | No | 149 | 86.6% | 24 | 96.0% | 0.323 |
| Yes | 23 | 13.4% | 1 | 4.0% | ||
| CPR/cardiac arrest | No | 146 | 84.9% | 24 | 96.0% | 0.211 |
| Yes | 26 | 15.1% | 1 | 4.0% | ||
| Chronic renal failure | No | 157 | 91.3% | 24 | 96.0% | 0.699 |
| Yes | 15 | 8.7% | 1 | 4.0% | ||
| Other Complications | No | 39 | 22.7% | 16 | 64.0% | 0.000 |
| Yes | 133 | 77.3% | 9 | 36.0% | ||
Comparison between flow degree and continuous outcomes after the protocol implementation.
| Flow degree | N | Mean | SD | SE | Sig | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Up | |||||||
| Length of stay in days | Non high flow | 14 | 12.64 | 8.454 | 2.260 | 0.108 | −43.7 | 5.02 |
| High flow | 11 | 32.00 | 35.914 | 10.828 | ||||
| Ventilation invasive | Non high flow | 14 | 7.93 | 9.417 | 2.517 | 0.320 | −22.9 | 8.12 |
| High flow | 11 | 15.36 | 22.340 | 6.736 | ||||
| Ventilation noninvasive | Non high flow | 13 | 6.46 | 7.817 | 2.168 | 0.388 | −22.5 | 9.09 |
| High flow | 11 | 13.18 | 26.248 | 7.914 | ||||
| Age | Non high flow | 14 | 45.14 | 38.10 | 10.184 | 0.117 | −5.591 | 47.149 |
| High flow | 11 | 24.36 | 20.358 | 6.138 | ||||
| Weight | Non high flow | 14 | 3.645 | 0.849 | 0.227 | 0.062 | −0.028 | 1.057 |
| High flow | 11 | 3.130 | 0.422 | 0.127 | ||||
| Creatinine 1 | Non high flow | 14 | 51.29 | 25.566 | 6.833 | 0.415 | −10.8 | 25.44 |
| High flow | 11 | 44.00 | 18.265 | 5.507 | ||||
| Creatinine 2 | Non high flow | 14 | 52.00 | 27.981 | 7.478 | 0.818 | −17.19 | 21.55 |
| High flow | 11 | 49.82 | 14.992 | 4.520 | ||||
| Inotropes per hour | Non high flow | 14 | 173.714 | 165.05 | 44.113 | 0.207 | −435.47 | 103.99 |
| High flow | 11 | 339.454 | 386.91 | 116.65 | ||||
| Lactic (mean) | Non high flow | 14 | 2.426 | 2.156 | 0.576 | 0.518 | −2.5 | 1.30 |
| High flow | 11 | 3.034 | 2.475 | 0.746 | ||||
| High flow | 11 | 3.5000 | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | ||||
Comparison between flow degree and categorical outcomes after the protocol implementation.
| Flow degree | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non high flow | High flow | Total | ||||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | P value | ||
| Gender | M | 10 | 71.4% | 9 | 81.8% | 19 | 76% | 0.661 |
| F | 4 | 28.6% | 2 | 18.2% | 6 | 24% | ||
| Year | 2013 | 5 | 35.7% | 1 | 9.1% | 6 | 24% | 0.172 |
| 2014 | 2 | 14.3% | 5 | 45.5% | 7 | 28% | ||
| 2015 | 7 | 50% | 5 | 45.5% | 12 | 48% | ||
| Re-intubation | 0 | 12 | 85.7% | 8 | 72.7% | 20 | 80.0% | 0.037 |
| 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 27.3% | 3 | 12.0% | ||
| 2 | 2 | 14.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 8.0% | ||
| Transfusion | No | 6 | 42.9% | 2 | 18.2% | 8 | 32.0% | 0.234 |
| Yes | 8 | 57.1% | 9 | 81.8% | 17 | 68.0% | ||
| Inotropes | No | 1 | 7.1% | 1 | 9.1% | 2 | 8.0% | 0.859 |
| Yes | 13 | 92.9% | 10 | 90.9% | 23 | 92.0% | ||
| Chylothorax | No | 14 | 100% | 7 | 63.6% | 21 | 84% | 0.026 |
| Yes | 0 | 0% | 4 | 36.4% | 4 | 16% | ||
| septicemia | No | 9 | 64.3% | 7 | 63.3% | 16 | 64% | 1.000 |
| Yes | 5 | 35.7% | 4 | 36.4% | 9 | 36% | ||
| Complications | 0 | 6 | 42.9% | 5 | 45.5% | 11 | 44% | 0.481 |
| 1 | 5 | 35.7% | 3 | 27.3% | 8 | 32% | ||
| 2 | 3 | 21.4% | 1 | 9.1% | 4 | 16% | ||
| 3 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 18.2% | 2 | 8% | ||
| Shunt size | 3.5 | 8 | 66.7% | 11 | 100% | 19 | 82.6% | 0.093 |
| 4 | 4 | 33.3% | 0 | 0% | 4 | 17.4% | ||