T Maekawa1,2, A Hagiwara3,2, M Hori1, C Andica1, T Haruyama1,4, M Kuramochi1,4, M Nakazawa1, S Koshino1,2, R Irie1,2, K Kamagata1, A Wada1, O Abe2, S Aoki1. 1. From the Department of Radiology (T.M., A.H., M.H., C.A., T.H., M.K., M.N., S.K., R.I., K.K., A.W., S.A.), Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Department of Radiology (T.M., A.H., S.K., R.I., O.A.), Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 3. From the Department of Radiology (T.M., A.H., M.H., C.A., T.H., M.K., M.N., S.K., R.I., K.K., A.W., S.A.), Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan a-hagiwara@juntendo.ac.jp. 4. Department of Radiological Sciences (T.H., M.K.), Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The effect of gadolinium on the estimation of myelin has not been reported. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effects of gadolinium on automatic myelin and brain tissue volumetry via quantitative synthetic MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 36 patients who were referred for brain metastases screening, and quantitative synthetic MR imaging data before and after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration were analyzed retrospectively. Brain metastases were detected in 17 patients. WM volume, GM volume, CSF volume, non-WM/GM/CSF volume, myelin volume, brain parenchymal volume, myelin fraction (myelin volume/brain parenchymal volume), and intracranial volume were estimated. T1 and T2 relaxation times, proton density, and myelin partial volume per voxel averaged across the brain parenchyma were also analyzed. RESULTS: In patients with and without metastases after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration, measurements of WM and myelin volumes, and myelin fraction were significantly increased (+26.65 and +29.42 mL, +10.14 and +12.46 mL, +0.88% and +1.09%, respectively), whereas measurements of GM, CSF, brain parenchymal, and intracranial volumes were significantly decreased (-36.23 and -34.49 mL, -20.77 and -18.94 mL, -6.76 and -2.84 mL, -27.41 and -21.84 mL, respectively). Non-WM/GM/CSF volume did not show a significant change. T1, T2, and proton density were significantly decreased (-51.34 and -46.84 ms, -2.67 and -4.70 ms, -1.05%, and -1.28%, respectively) after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration, whereas measurements of myelin partial volume were significantly increased (+0.78% and +0.75%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Gadolinium had a significant effect on the automatic calculation of myelin and brain tissue volumes using quantitative synthetic MR imaging, which can be explained by decreases in T1, T2, and proton density.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The effect of gadolinium on the estimation of myelin has not been reported. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effects of gadolinium on automatic myelin and brain tissue volumetry via quantitative synthetic MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 36 patients who were referred for brain metastases screening, and quantitative synthetic MR imaging data before and after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration were analyzed retrospectively. Brain metastases were detected in 17 patients. WM volume, GM volume, CSF volume, non-WM/GM/CSF volume, myelin volume, brain parenchymal volume, myelin fraction (myelin volume/brain parenchymal volume), and intracranial volume were estimated. T1 and T2 relaxation times, proton density, and myelin partial volume per voxel averaged across the brain parenchyma were also analyzed. RESULTS: In patients with and without metastases after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration, measurements of WM and myelin volumes, and myelin fraction were significantly increased (+26.65 and +29.42 mL, +10.14 and +12.46 mL, +0.88% and +1.09%, respectively), whereas measurements of GM, CSF, brain parenchymal, and intracranial volumes were significantly decreased (-36.23 and -34.49 mL, -20.77 and -18.94 mL, -6.76 and -2.84 mL, -27.41 and -21.84 mL, respectively). Non-WM/GM/CSF volume did not show a significant change. T1, T2, and proton density were significantly decreased (-51.34 and -46.84 ms, -2.67 and -4.70 ms, -1.05%, and -1.28%, respectively) after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration, whereas measurements of myelin partial volume were significantly increased (+0.78% and +0.75%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:Gadolinium had a significant effect on the automatic calculation of myelin and brain tissue volumes using quantitative synthetic MR imaging, which can be explained by decreases in T1, T2, and proton density.
Authors: Siamak P Nejad-Davarani; Niloufar Zakariaei; Yongsheng Chen; E Mark Haacke; Newton J Hurst; M Salim Siddiqui; Lonni R Schultz; James M Snyder; Tobias Walbert; Carri K Glide-Hurst Journal: Med Phys Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: S Hara; M Hori; A Hagiwara; Y Tsurushima; Y Tanaka; T Maehara; S Aoki; T Nariai Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-08-27 Impact factor: 3.825