| Literature DB >> 30591433 |
Maren Wellenreuther1,2, Jérémy Le Luyer3,4, Denham Cook5, Peter A Ritchie6, Louis Bernatchez3.
Abstract
Identifying genes and pathways involved in domestication is critical to understand how species change in response to human-induced selection pressures, such as increased temperatures. Given the profound influence of temperature on fish metabolism and organismal performance, a comparison of how temperature affects wild and domestic strains of snapper is an important question to address. We experimentally manipulated temperature conditions for F1-hatchery and wild Australasian snapper (Chrysophrys auratus) for 18 days to mimic seasonal extremes and measured differences in growth, white muscle RNA transcription and hematological parameters. Over 2.2 Gb paired-end reads were assembled de novo for a total set of 33,017 transcripts (N50 = 2,804). We found pronounced growth and gene expression differences between wild and domesticated individuals related to global developmental and immune pathways. Temperature-modulated growth responses were linked to major pathways affecting metabolism, cell regulation and signaling. This study is the first step toward gaining an understanding of the changes occurring in the early stages of domestication, and the mechanisms underlying thermal adaptation and associated growth in poikilothermic vertebrates. Our study further provides the first transcriptome resources for studying biological questions in this non-model fish species.Entities:
Keywords: Domestication; Growth; Sparidae; Temperature; Transcriptomics
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30591433 PMCID: PMC6325909 DOI: 10.1534/g3.118.200647
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
Phenotypic values of wild and domesticated C. auratus used in the low and high temperature treatments. Errors in brackets are standard error of the mean, n = 8. All physiological traits were measured upon termination of the experiment
| Low Temperature Treatment | High Temperature Treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild Population | Domesticated Population | Wild Population | Domesticated Population | |
| 159.5 (6.7) | 149.5 (4.7) | 145.9 (7.9) | 151.2 (4.6) | |
| 144.3 (7.0) | 150.5 (4.8) | 154.4 (7.0) | 178.9 (6.6) | |
| 189.6 (3.1) | 194.2 (1.6) | 186.9 (3.4) | 194.7 (3.3) | |
| 189.6 (3.1) | 194.4 (1.6) | 190.3 (3.0) | 200.3 (3.0) | |
| −0.37 (0.09) | 0.03 (0.05) | 0.22 (0.07) | 0.60 (0.07) | |
| 0.01 (0.00) | 0.01 (0.01) | 0.12 (0.03) | 0.21 (0.05) | |
| 1.57 (0.13) | 1.48 (0.13) | 1.57 (0.19) | 1.67 (0.10) | |
| 0.15 (0.03) | 0.12 (0.03) | 0.09 (0.01) | 0.12 (0.01) | |
| 28.0 (1.0) | 33.4 (2.2) | 30.4 (0.5) | 32.6 (1.0) | |
| 6.0 (0.1) | 4.8 (0.4) | 6.2 (0.2) | 6.2 (0.2) | |
| 21.4 (0.7) | 14.4 (0.5) | 20.5 (3.5) | 19.0 (0.7) | |
| 1.00 (0.10) | 2.50 (0.29) | 4.24 (0.52) | 4.13 (0.21) | |
| 2.23 (0.38) | 1.68 (0.10) | 3.19 (0.30) | 3.45 (0.28) | |
| 11.33 (0.69) | 11.76 (1.01) | 9.22 (0.58) | 6.47 (0.60) | |
denotes significantly different values between temperature treatments within the same (wild/domesticated) population, † denotes significant differences between wild and domesticated C. auratus at comparable temperatures. Analyses were performed using parametric ANOVA with a Bonferroni adjustment. Significance was accepted at P < 0.05, non-parametric data were log transformed to meet assumptions of normality or homoscedasticity. LGR = linear growth rate; MCHC = mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; SGR = specific growth rate.
Sequencing results, reads pre-processing and mapping summaries
| Treatment | Samples | Raw PE reads | Trimmed PE reads | Mapped PE reads | Mapping rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domesticated - High | DH.1MA | 23.0 M | 22.4 M | 18.0 M | 80.1 |
| Domesticated - High | DH.4MA | 23.3 M | 22.7 M | 18.2 M | 80.4 |
| Domesticated - High | DH.5MA | 33.9 M | 21.5 M | 17.6 M | 81.9 |
| Domesticated – Low | DL.4MA | 23.3 M | 22.6 M | 17.9 M | 79.3 |
| Domesticated – Low | DL.5MA | 23. 4M | 22.8 M | 17.9 M | 78.6 |
| Domesticated – Low | DL.6MA | 23.4 M | 22.8 M | 17.7 M | 77.9 |
| Wild –High | WH.1MA | 22.3 M | 21.6 M | 17.6 M | 82.0 |
| Wild –High | WH.2MA | 22.5 M | 21.9 M | 18.0 M | 81.9 |
| Wild –Low | WL.1MA | 22.9 M | 22.2 M | 15.9 M | 71.6 |
| Wild –Low | WL.3MA | 23.2 M | 22.6 M | 17.6 M | 77.8 |
| Wild –Low | WL.6MA | 22.3 M | 21.6 M | 16.4 M | 75.7 |
Figure 1Specific growth rates of wild and domesticated C. auratus (8n/treatment) at the start and end of the low and warm temperature experiment.
Assembly and annotation statistics
| Transcriptome statistics | |
|---|---|
| Total number contigs | 33, 017 |
| Percent GC | 48.61 |
| Contigs N50 (bp) | 2,804 |
| Total assembled bases | 63, 545, 739 |
| Median contig length (bp) | 1,482 |
| Average contig length (bp) | 1,924 |
| Contig with Uniprot-sp match (e-value 10−6) | 26,589 |
| Contig with GO identifier annotation | 25,837 |
GO = gene ontology.
Number of differentially expressed genes using a contrast approach and GLM model in edgeR. Genes were considered differentially expressed when FDR was below 1% and |log2FC| > 2. A single gene showed significant interaction (genotype x temperature; FDR < 1%)
| Effect | Reference condition | Down-regulated | Up-regulated | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | Low | 736 | 725 | 1,461 |
| Genotype | Wild | 56 | 150 | 206 |
| Interaction Genotype x Temperature | 1 | |||
Figure 2Effect of temperature and genotype one gene expression. A) Distance-base redundancy analysis (db-RDA) performed on the expression data (logCPM [prior count 2)]. Only genes with min logCPM > 1 in at least three samples were retained for the analysis (n = 14,372). The db-RDA model was globally significant (P < 0.001) and explained 59.8% of all expression variation (adj. R2 = 0.598). Genotype and temperature significantly explained 17.7% and 50.1% of the variation, respectively, after controlling for each other with subsequent partial db-RDAs. Significance codes: p-value < 0.001 ‘***’; p-value < 0.01 ‘**’; B) Heatmap and K-means clustering of genes showing differential expression between genotypes and/or temperature; C) Venn diagram showing the overlap between genotype and temperature in an additive effect (parallel reaction norms).
Figure 3Co-expression network analysis. A) Correlation matrix from weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). The matrix of co-expression was built on a total of 11,426 genes after removal of low-expressed genes (logCPM < 1 in at least two individuals and genes with gene expression variance < 0.1 in the global dataset). Only modules significantly correlating (p-value < 0.01) with temperature or genotype are represented. Values indicate the correlation value (R). B) Correlation between module membership and gene significance for the modules with the highest correlation to temperature (modules bisque4 and darkviolet) and genotype (module darkorange2).
Figure 4Interactions between temperature and genotype for BMAL2 gene expression.