Literature DB >> 30591226

Intra-medullary nail insertion accuracy: A comparison of the infra-patellar and supra-patellar approach.

Thomas R E Anderson1, Philip A Beak2, Alex J Trompeter2.   

Abstract

AIMS: The anatomical safe zone for intra-medullary nail insertion through the tibial plateau is small, insertion outside of this area risks damage to intra-articular structures and poor fracture reduction. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine if the new supra-patella (SP) approach confers improved nail insertion accuracy, when compared with the standard infra-patella (IP) technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred cases were included in the study (SP 95, IP 105). Insertion accuracy was assessed on AP and lateral radiographic imaging, and measured as the distances between the central axis of the proximal nail and the ideal entry point.
RESULTS: The median distance from the ideal entry point was 4.4 mm (SP) and 5.1 mm (IP) (p = 0.046) in the coronal plane, and 4.0 mm (SP) and 3.7 mm (IP) (p = 0.527) in the sagittal plane. A narrower range in measurements was observed in the SP technique in both sagittal and coronal planes, 17.8 mm vs 28.6 mm, and 19.7 mm vs 30.3 mm respectively.
CONCLUSION: We found that the SP technique achieved significantly improved nail insertion accuracy in the coronal plane. Insertion accuracy was equivocal between the two techniques in the sagittal plane. A narrower range in entry points was observed in the SP cohort in both planes suggesting improved control in nail insertion using this technique. Crown
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intra-medullary nailing; Technique; Tibial fractures; Trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30591226     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.12.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  6 in total

1.  A comparison of anterior knee pain, kneeling pain and functional outcomes in suprapatellar versus infrapatellar tibial nailing.

Authors:  Andreas Fontalis; Simon Weil; Michael Williamson; James Houston; Tamer Ads; Alex Trompeter
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-01-08

2.  Comparison between infrapatellar and suprapatellar approaches for intramedullary nailing for the fractures of the tibial shaft.

Authors:  Ke Lu; Yi-Jun Gao; Hong-Zhen Wang; Chong Li; Rong-Xun Qian; Qi-Rong Dong
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Investigating and defining outcomes of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Simon Thwaites; Dominic Thewlis; Kelly Hall; Mark Rickman
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2022-05-26

4.  Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar nailing for tibial shaft fractures: A comparison of surgical and clinical outcomes between two approaches.

Authors:  M Al-Azzawi; D Davenport; Z Shah; R Khakha; A Afsharpad
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-01-29

5.  A Review of Proximal Tibia Entry Points for Intramedullary Nailing and Validation of The Lateral Parapatellar Approach as Extra-articular.

Authors:  Akshar H Patel; J Heath Wilder; Olivia C Lee; Austin J Ross; Krishna C Vemulapalli; Paul B Gladden; Murphy P Martin; William F Sherman
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-01-30

6.  Time to entry point and distal locking of intramedullary nails: a methodological phantom study comparing biplanar and uniplanar surgical imaging.

Authors:  Peter Ström; Nils P Hailer; Olof Wolf
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.